Henrique Mansur, J. Paiva, Isnar Castro Júnior
{"title":"PO 18169 - Subtalar arthrodesis","authors":"Henrique Mansur, J. Paiva, Isnar Castro Júnior","doi":"10.30795/scijfootankle.2019.v13.1024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: There is no consensus in the literature on the most effective technique for subtalar arthrodesis, particularly the optimal number of screws for adequate fixation. Our objective is to determine whether there is a difference in the fusion rates of subtalar arthrodesis when one or 2 compression screws are used. Methods: Retrospective study assessing the fusion rate of patients who underwent subtalar arthrodesis between January 2012 to December 2016. Fusion was determined clinically using radiographs and, when necessary, computed tomography. Results: The final sample consisted of 80 patients, 78.8% of whom were male, and the mean final evaluation time was 23.27 months. Subtalar arthrosis due to calcaneal fracture was the etiologic factor in 95% of the patients. The group that underwent arthrodesis with one screw accounted for 68.75% patients, and the group with 2 screws accounted for 31.25% patients. The incidence of nonfusion was 10.9% in the group for which one screw was used, in contrast to 4.0% in the group in which 2 screws were used, and the difference was not significant (p=0.425). Conclusion: The use of a second screw did not improve the fusion rates of subtalar arthrodesis.","PeriodicalId":21602,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Journal of the Foot & Ankle","volume":"151 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Journal of the Foot & Ankle","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30795/scijfootankle.2019.v13.1024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

文献中关于距下关节融合术的最有效技术,特别是最佳固定螺钉数量尚无共识。我们的目的是确定当使用一枚或两枚加压螺钉时距下关节融合术的融合率是否有差异。方法:回顾性研究2012年1月至2016年12月行距下关节融合术患者的融合率。临床使用x线片确定融合,必要时使用计算机断层扫描。结果:终诊患者80例,男性78.8%,终诊平均时间23.27个月。跟骨骨折引起的距下关节是95%患者的病因。1枚螺钉融合术组占68.75%,2枚螺钉融合术组占31.25%。使用1枚螺钉组不融合发生率为10.9%,使用2枚螺钉组为4.0%,差异无统计学意义(p=0.425)。结论:使用第二枚螺钉并不能提高距下关节融合术的融合率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PO 18169 - Subtalar arthrodesis
Introduction: There is no consensus in the literature on the most effective technique for subtalar arthrodesis, particularly the optimal number of screws for adequate fixation. Our objective is to determine whether there is a difference in the fusion rates of subtalar arthrodesis when one or 2 compression screws are used. Methods: Retrospective study assessing the fusion rate of patients who underwent subtalar arthrodesis between January 2012 to December 2016. Fusion was determined clinically using radiographs and, when necessary, computed tomography. Results: The final sample consisted of 80 patients, 78.8% of whom were male, and the mean final evaluation time was 23.27 months. Subtalar arthrosis due to calcaneal fracture was the etiologic factor in 95% of the patients. The group that underwent arthrodesis with one screw accounted for 68.75% patients, and the group with 2 screws accounted for 31.25% patients. The incidence of nonfusion was 10.9% in the group for which one screw was used, in contrast to 4.0% in the group in which 2 screws were used, and the difference was not significant (p=0.425). Conclusion: The use of a second screw did not improve the fusion rates of subtalar arthrodesis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hallux valgus: Patología tridimensional. Nuevo enfoque terapéutico Conservative treatment of hallux rigidus: narrative review of scientific evidence The SUPERankle procedure in the treatment of foot and ankle deformities in fibular hemimelia Hallux rigidus: clinical examination, radiology, and classification Arthroscopic treatment for posteromedial talar process fracture (Cedell fracture): a case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1