Nourishing quality naturopathic and herbal clinical research output: a critical element for inclusion in clinical practice guidelines and public health strategies

We all know that, other than a few outlandish practices, in general naturopathy and herbalism have a record of being low-risk when practised by appropriately qualified and experienced practitioners. It lays testament to one of the main characteristics of our practices, a specialised expertise about safe and effective natural medicine. It isn’t limited to the prescription of natural medicines (nutraceuticals and herbs), it also extends to other natural interventions and safe, person-centred and effective communication, which is more than just imparting information about high-risk health behaviours. We are trained in personal, sensitive and ethical communication that fosters autonomy and self-determination. These things together, adapted to individual needs, define our role. Given our clinical skills, naturopaths and herbalists are positioned alongside other health practitioners providing service, contributing to health, and meeting expressed public desires and health needs. It is somewhat perplexing that health policy and guidelines often dismiss our role and generally overlook our profession.