初步开发和测试移动健康应用程序的可信度:一项针对寻求产前护理的妇女的临床研究

IF 0.7 Q3 COMMUNICATION Atlantic Journal of Communication Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI:10.1080/15456870.2021.2021910
LaKesha N. Anderson, Jasmyne J. Womack, C. Ledford
{"title":"初步开发和测试移动健康应用程序的可信度:一项针对寻求产前护理的妇女的临床研究","authors":"LaKesha N. Anderson, Jasmyne J. Womack, C. Ledford","doi":"10.1080/15456870.2021.2021910","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT As misinformation is linked to poor health outcomes for pregnant women, and mobile apps provide free and unregulated access to information, it is important to understand the role of credibility in mobile health. The purpose of this study was to develop and assess a reliable scale for measuring mobile health (mHealth) credibility. Based on a previous measure for assessing web credibility, we also sought to identify source credibility dimensions for mobile apps. The mHealth credibility scale included seven items. Three scale dimensions were identified: concern, character, and competence. Both referent source for mobile apps and app developer were significantly associated with perceived mHealth credibility. This study is a first attempt to both design and test a measure of credibility for mobile health apps. This mHealth credibility scale can be used to guide future app development, communication, and medical research.","PeriodicalId":45354,"journal":{"name":"Atlantic Journal of Communication","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Initial development and testing of a measure of credibility of mobile health apps: a clinical study among women seeking prenatal care\",\"authors\":\"LaKesha N. Anderson, Jasmyne J. Womack, C. Ledford\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15456870.2021.2021910\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT As misinformation is linked to poor health outcomes for pregnant women, and mobile apps provide free and unregulated access to information, it is important to understand the role of credibility in mobile health. The purpose of this study was to develop and assess a reliable scale for measuring mobile health (mHealth) credibility. Based on a previous measure for assessing web credibility, we also sought to identify source credibility dimensions for mobile apps. The mHealth credibility scale included seven items. Three scale dimensions were identified: concern, character, and competence. Both referent source for mobile apps and app developer were significantly associated with perceived mHealth credibility. This study is a first attempt to both design and test a measure of credibility for mobile health apps. This mHealth credibility scale can be used to guide future app development, communication, and medical research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45354,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Atlantic Journal of Communication\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Atlantic Journal of Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2021.2021910\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atlantic Journal of Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2021.2021910","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于错误信息与孕妇的不良健康结果有关,并且移动应用程序提供免费且不受监管的信息访问,因此了解可信度在移动健康中的作用非常重要。本研究的目的是开发和评估一个可靠的量表来衡量移动医疗(mHealth)的可信度。基于先前评估网络可信度的措施,我们还试图确定移动应用程序的源可信度维度。移动医疗可信度量表包括七个项目。确定了三个量表维度:关注、性格和能力。移动应用程序的参考来源和应用程序开发人员都与感知到的移动健康可信度显著相关。这项研究是第一次尝试设计和测试移动健康应用程序的可信度。这种移动医疗的可信度可以用来指导未来的应用程序开发、交流和医学研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Initial development and testing of a measure of credibility of mobile health apps: a clinical study among women seeking prenatal care
ABSTRACT As misinformation is linked to poor health outcomes for pregnant women, and mobile apps provide free and unregulated access to information, it is important to understand the role of credibility in mobile health. The purpose of this study was to develop and assess a reliable scale for measuring mobile health (mHealth) credibility. Based on a previous measure for assessing web credibility, we also sought to identify source credibility dimensions for mobile apps. The mHealth credibility scale included seven items. Three scale dimensions were identified: concern, character, and competence. Both referent source for mobile apps and app developer were significantly associated with perceived mHealth credibility. This study is a first attempt to both design and test a measure of credibility for mobile health apps. This mHealth credibility scale can be used to guide future app development, communication, and medical research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
Current cases of and motivations for second screen use by generation Z: university students Everyday conversations that impact health communication: developing and validating the everyday family health communication measure Don’t try to make me laugh, let me do: persuading employees to action Theories for social justice and reduction of inequalities: a review of freirean communications Development and problems of the national journalistic model of Kazakhstan, considering social, ethical, managerial, and marketing mechanisms of the media environment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1