CoaguChek XS在抗磷脂综合征患者中的准确性

James R. Taylor, C. Richter, Chris Lindamood, Xinyu Liu, M. Zumberg, Brad Fletcher
{"title":"CoaguChek XS在抗磷脂综合征患者中的准确性","authors":"James R. Taylor, C. Richter, Chris Lindamood, Xinyu Liu, M. Zumberg, Brad Fletcher","doi":"10.1097/POC.0000000000000149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The CoaguChek XS meter is an international normalized ratio (INR) point-of-care (POC) monitor that has been shown to provide clinically acceptable accuracy. Because of a potential interaction between antiphospholipid antibodies and the reagent used in the prothrombin time INR assay, there is uncertainty as to the reliability of using POC INR monitors in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APLS). The study population consisted of 41 patients on warfarin therapy for either APLS (treatment group) or any other indication (control group). All patients had their INR analyzed by the CoaguChek XS meter and a central laboratory. Overall, the mean INR difference between the CoaguChek XS and laboratory in the APLS patients was 0.6772 (P < 0.0001). In APLS patients, when the laboratory INR was less than 2.0, 2.0 to 3.0, 3.1 to 4.0, or greater than 4.0, the CoaguChek XS differed by averages of 0.0636 (P = 0.4111), 0.6903 (P < 0.0001), 1.1417 (P < 0.0001), and 0.9333 (P = 0.0848), respectively. In the control group the overall mean difference was 0.5456 (P < 0.0001). For laboratory INR values of less than 2.0, 2.0 to 3.0, 3.1 to 4.0, and greater than 4.0, the mean differences from the CoaguChek XS were 0.3000 (P = 0.0003), 0.4444 (P < 0.0001), 1.0444 (P = 0.0002), and 1.3500 (P = 0.0236). Our data do support the manufacturer recommendation of comparing laboratory and CoaguChek XS meter INRs in APLS patients because in a subset of patients the 2 methods produced acceptable results, and POC monitoring might be used.","PeriodicalId":20262,"journal":{"name":"Point of Care: The Journal of Near-Patient Testing & Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy of CoaguChek XS in Patients With Antiphospholipid Syndrome\",\"authors\":\"James R. Taylor, C. Richter, Chris Lindamood, Xinyu Liu, M. Zumberg, Brad Fletcher\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/POC.0000000000000149\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The CoaguChek XS meter is an international normalized ratio (INR) point-of-care (POC) monitor that has been shown to provide clinically acceptable accuracy. Because of a potential interaction between antiphospholipid antibodies and the reagent used in the prothrombin time INR assay, there is uncertainty as to the reliability of using POC INR monitors in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APLS). The study population consisted of 41 patients on warfarin therapy for either APLS (treatment group) or any other indication (control group). All patients had their INR analyzed by the CoaguChek XS meter and a central laboratory. Overall, the mean INR difference between the CoaguChek XS and laboratory in the APLS patients was 0.6772 (P < 0.0001). In APLS patients, when the laboratory INR was less than 2.0, 2.0 to 3.0, 3.1 to 4.0, or greater than 4.0, the CoaguChek XS differed by averages of 0.0636 (P = 0.4111), 0.6903 (P < 0.0001), 1.1417 (P < 0.0001), and 0.9333 (P = 0.0848), respectively. In the control group the overall mean difference was 0.5456 (P < 0.0001). For laboratory INR values of less than 2.0, 2.0 to 3.0, 3.1 to 4.0, and greater than 4.0, the mean differences from the CoaguChek XS were 0.3000 (P = 0.0003), 0.4444 (P < 0.0001), 1.0444 (P = 0.0002), and 1.3500 (P = 0.0236). Our data do support the manufacturer recommendation of comparing laboratory and CoaguChek XS meter INRs in APLS patients because in a subset of patients the 2 methods produced acceptable results, and POC monitoring might be used.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20262,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Point of Care: The Journal of Near-Patient Testing & Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Point of Care: The Journal of Near-Patient Testing & Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/POC.0000000000000149\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Point of Care: The Journal of Near-Patient Testing & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/POC.0000000000000149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

CoaguChek XS仪表是一种国际标准化比率(INR)护理点(POC)监测仪,已被证明提供临床可接受的准确性。由于抗磷脂抗体与用于凝血酶原时间INR测定的试剂之间存在潜在的相互作用,因此在抗磷脂综合征(apl)患者中使用POC INR监测器的可靠性存在不确定性。研究人群包括41例接受华法林治疗的apl患者(治疗组)或任何其他适应症(对照组)。所有患者的INR均由CoaguChek XS仪器和中心实验室进行分析。总体而言,CoaguChek XS与实验室在apl患者中的平均INR差异为0.6772 (P < 0.0001)。在apl患者中,当实验室INR小于2.0、2.0 ~ 3.0、3.1 ~ 4.0、大于4.0时,CoaguChek XS的平均差异分别为0.0636 (P = 0.4111)、0.6903 (P < 0.0001)、1.1417 (P < 0.0001)、0.9333 (P = 0.0848)。对照组总平均差异为0.5456 (P < 0.0001)。实验室INR值小于2.0、2.0 ~ 3.0、3.1 ~ 4.0和大于4.0时,与CoaguChek XS的平均差异分别为0.3000 (P = 0.0003)、0.4444 (P < 0.0001)、1.0444 (P = 0.0002)和1.3500 (P = 0.0236)。我们的数据确实支持制造商在apl患者中比较实验室和CoaguChek XS仪表INRs的建议,因为在一部分患者中,这两种方法产生了可接受的结果,并且可以使用POC监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Accuracy of CoaguChek XS in Patients With Antiphospholipid Syndrome
Abstract The CoaguChek XS meter is an international normalized ratio (INR) point-of-care (POC) monitor that has been shown to provide clinically acceptable accuracy. Because of a potential interaction between antiphospholipid antibodies and the reagent used in the prothrombin time INR assay, there is uncertainty as to the reliability of using POC INR monitors in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APLS). The study population consisted of 41 patients on warfarin therapy for either APLS (treatment group) or any other indication (control group). All patients had their INR analyzed by the CoaguChek XS meter and a central laboratory. Overall, the mean INR difference between the CoaguChek XS and laboratory in the APLS patients was 0.6772 (P < 0.0001). In APLS patients, when the laboratory INR was less than 2.0, 2.0 to 3.0, 3.1 to 4.0, or greater than 4.0, the CoaguChek XS differed by averages of 0.0636 (P = 0.4111), 0.6903 (P < 0.0001), 1.1417 (P < 0.0001), and 0.9333 (P = 0.0848), respectively. In the control group the overall mean difference was 0.5456 (P < 0.0001). For laboratory INR values of less than 2.0, 2.0 to 3.0, 3.1 to 4.0, and greater than 4.0, the mean differences from the CoaguChek XS were 0.3000 (P = 0.0003), 0.4444 (P < 0.0001), 1.0444 (P = 0.0002), and 1.3500 (P = 0.0236). Our data do support the manufacturer recommendation of comparing laboratory and CoaguChek XS meter INRs in APLS patients because in a subset of patients the 2 methods produced acceptable results, and POC monitoring might be used.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Comparison of International Normalized Ratio Results by Point-of-Care Device and Clinical Laboratory Analyzers in a Vascular Surgery Department Point-of-Care Testing in Hypercoagulable Conditions Managed With Warfarin Critical Care Nurses' Views and Experiences of Preanalytical Factors Influencing Point-of-Care Testing Rapid Assessment of Coagulation at the Point of Care With the Hemochron Signature Elite System Invited Product Profile: Detecting Antibodies for Lyme Disease at the Point of Care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1