职前小学教师解题:使用条形图与代数方法

Melike Kara, Kimberly Corum
{"title":"职前小学教师解题:使用条形图与代数方法","authors":"Melike Kara, Kimberly Corum","doi":"10.51272/PMENA.42.2020-277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Creating, connecting, and translating multiple representation are “important cognitive processes that lead students to develop robust mathematical understandings” (Huntley, Marcus, Kahan, & Miller, 2007, p. 117). These cognitive processes are also considered to be crucial elements of preservice teachers’ (PSTs’) pedagogical content knowledge (Dreher, Kuntze, & Lerman, 2016). In order to investigate PSTs’ cognitive processes regarding multiple representations, we collected data from 73 PSTs, who enrolled in a mathematics content course for elementary education majors in Spring 2019. We analyzed PSTs’ solutions to an assessment task following seven weeks of instruction related to the use of strip diagrams, double number lines, and algebraic equations to solve problems involving ratio and proportional relationships and word problems (Beckmann, 2014). The PSTs were asked to determine the total number of cookies Bonnie baked when given information about the cookie types (e.g., 1/3 of the cookies were chocolate chip, 1/6 were peanut butter, 1/6 were oatmeal raisin, and 24 were cinnamon) in two ways: using a strip diagram and writing and solving an algebraic equation. We used an error analysis technique (Radatz, 1979) to sort and interpret the responses based on fluency with strip diagram and algebraic solutions. The PSTs who exhibited complete reasoning were able to use both representations and the PSTs who exhibited incomplete reasoning were unable to use at least one of the representations. The preliminary analysis of solutions revealed the following themes in the PSTs’ strategies (Table 1).","PeriodicalId":68089,"journal":{"name":"数学教学通讯","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pre-service elementary education teachers’ solutions for word problems: Using strip diagram vs. algebraic approach\",\"authors\":\"Melike Kara, Kimberly Corum\",\"doi\":\"10.51272/PMENA.42.2020-277\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Creating, connecting, and translating multiple representation are “important cognitive processes that lead students to develop robust mathematical understandings” (Huntley, Marcus, Kahan, & Miller, 2007, p. 117). These cognitive processes are also considered to be crucial elements of preservice teachers’ (PSTs’) pedagogical content knowledge (Dreher, Kuntze, & Lerman, 2016). In order to investigate PSTs’ cognitive processes regarding multiple representations, we collected data from 73 PSTs, who enrolled in a mathematics content course for elementary education majors in Spring 2019. We analyzed PSTs’ solutions to an assessment task following seven weeks of instruction related to the use of strip diagrams, double number lines, and algebraic equations to solve problems involving ratio and proportional relationships and word problems (Beckmann, 2014). The PSTs were asked to determine the total number of cookies Bonnie baked when given information about the cookie types (e.g., 1/3 of the cookies were chocolate chip, 1/6 were peanut butter, 1/6 were oatmeal raisin, and 24 were cinnamon) in two ways: using a strip diagram and writing and solving an algebraic equation. We used an error analysis technique (Radatz, 1979) to sort and interpret the responses based on fluency with strip diagram and algebraic solutions. The PSTs who exhibited complete reasoning were able to use both representations and the PSTs who exhibited incomplete reasoning were unable to use at least one of the representations. The preliminary analysis of solutions revealed the following themes in the PSTs’ strategies (Table 1).\",\"PeriodicalId\":68089,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"数学教学通讯\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"数学教学通讯\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1089\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51272/PMENA.42.2020-277\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"数学教学通讯","FirstCategoryId":"1089","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51272/PMENA.42.2020-277","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

创造、连接和翻译多重表示是“重要的认知过程,可以引导学生发展强大的数学理解”(Huntley, Marcus, Kahan, & Miller, 2007, p. 117)。这些认知过程也被认为是职前教师(pst)教学内容知识的关键要素(Dreher, Kuntze, & Lerman, 2016)。为了研究pst对多重表征的认知过程,我们收集了73名pst的数据,这些pst于2019年春季参加了基础教育专业的数学内容课程。在七周的教学后,我们分析了PSTs对评估任务的解决方案,该任务涉及使用条形图,双数轴和代数方程来解决涉及比例和比例关系以及单词问题的问题(Beckmann, 2014)。当给出饼干类型的信息(例如,1/3的饼干是巧克力片,1/6是花生酱,1/6是燕麦葡萄干,24是肉桂)时,要求pst以两种方式确定Bonnie烤的饼干的总数:使用条形图和编写并解决代数方程。我们使用了一种误差分析技术(Radatz, 1979)来分类和解释基于条形图和代数解流畅性的反应。表现出完全推理能力的学生能够使用两种表征,而表现出不完全推理能力的学生不能使用至少一种表征。对解决方案的初步分析揭示了pst战略中的以下主题(表1)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pre-service elementary education teachers’ solutions for word problems: Using strip diagram vs. algebraic approach
Creating, connecting, and translating multiple representation are “important cognitive processes that lead students to develop robust mathematical understandings” (Huntley, Marcus, Kahan, & Miller, 2007, p. 117). These cognitive processes are also considered to be crucial elements of preservice teachers’ (PSTs’) pedagogical content knowledge (Dreher, Kuntze, & Lerman, 2016). In order to investigate PSTs’ cognitive processes regarding multiple representations, we collected data from 73 PSTs, who enrolled in a mathematics content course for elementary education majors in Spring 2019. We analyzed PSTs’ solutions to an assessment task following seven weeks of instruction related to the use of strip diagrams, double number lines, and algebraic equations to solve problems involving ratio and proportional relationships and word problems (Beckmann, 2014). The PSTs were asked to determine the total number of cookies Bonnie baked when given information about the cookie types (e.g., 1/3 of the cookies were chocolate chip, 1/6 were peanut butter, 1/6 were oatmeal raisin, and 24 were cinnamon) in two ways: using a strip diagram and writing and solving an algebraic equation. We used an error analysis technique (Radatz, 1979) to sort and interpret the responses based on fluency with strip diagram and algebraic solutions. The PSTs who exhibited complete reasoning were able to use both representations and the PSTs who exhibited incomplete reasoning were unable to use at least one of the representations. The preliminary analysis of solutions revealed the following themes in the PSTs’ strategies (Table 1).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22282
期刊最新文献
What makes a mathematics lesson interesting to students? Elementary teachers’ discourse about mathematical reasoning Two prospective middle school teachers reinvent combinatorial formulas: permutations and arrangements Report of a classroom experience for the development of distribution models / Experiencia en el aula para el desarrollo de modelos para el reparto Self-efficacy and the kernel of content knowledge
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1