美国内窥镜逆行胆管造影后肠道穿孔:一项为期16年的研究,使用全国住院患者样本。

B. Olaiya, D. Adler
{"title":"美国内窥镜逆行胆管造影后肠道穿孔:一项为期16年的研究,使用全国住院患者样本。","authors":"B. Olaiya, D. Adler","doi":"10.23736/S1121-421X.20.02718-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nIntestinal perforation is a rare but feared complication of ERCP. In this study, we identify patient and hospital factors for ERCP related intestinal perforation using a large national database. We also examine the effects of intestinal perforations on hospital outcomes.\n\n\nMETHODS\nData were obtained from the National Inpatient Sample, the largest publicly available inpatient care database in the United States. ICD-9-CM procedure codes for all ERCP procedures conducted between 1998 and 2013. Our primary outcome of interest was the incidence of intestinal perforations after ERCP. Secondary outcomes of interest included hospital length of stay and inpatient mortality.\n\n\nRESULTS\nA total of 392,336 ERCP procedures were performed over the study period, met our inclusion criteria, and were analyzed. Mean age of sample was 59 years and just over 60% were females. Low volume hospitals accounted for over 85% of ERCPs. Intestinal perforations occurred at a rate of 1.2 per 1000 ERCP procedures. Patient's age was the only patient-related factor significantly associated with perforation. (OR: 1.016; 95% CI 1.009 - 1.025). For hospitals, teaching status was the only hospital related factor associated with intestinal perforation after ERCP (OR: 1.56; 95% CI 1.28 -1.91). Length of stay was much longer in patients with ERCP related perforations and mortality risk was ten times higher in the same cohort.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nPatients who have ERCP related perforations have longer hospital stays and have a higher mortality risk. Older patients and those who had ERCP in teaching hospitals are at a higher risk of perforation.","PeriodicalId":74201,"journal":{"name":"Minerva gastroenterologica e dietologica","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intestinal perforations after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the United States: a 16-year study using the national inpatient sample.\",\"authors\":\"B. Olaiya, D. Adler\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S1121-421X.20.02718-X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\nIntestinal perforation is a rare but feared complication of ERCP. In this study, we identify patient and hospital factors for ERCP related intestinal perforation using a large national database. We also examine the effects of intestinal perforations on hospital outcomes.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nData were obtained from the National Inpatient Sample, the largest publicly available inpatient care database in the United States. ICD-9-CM procedure codes for all ERCP procedures conducted between 1998 and 2013. Our primary outcome of interest was the incidence of intestinal perforations after ERCP. Secondary outcomes of interest included hospital length of stay and inpatient mortality.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nA total of 392,336 ERCP procedures were performed over the study period, met our inclusion criteria, and were analyzed. Mean age of sample was 59 years and just over 60% were females. Low volume hospitals accounted for over 85% of ERCPs. Intestinal perforations occurred at a rate of 1.2 per 1000 ERCP procedures. Patient's age was the only patient-related factor significantly associated with perforation. (OR: 1.016; 95% CI 1.009 - 1.025). For hospitals, teaching status was the only hospital related factor associated with intestinal perforation after ERCP (OR: 1.56; 95% CI 1.28 -1.91). Length of stay was much longer in patients with ERCP related perforations and mortality risk was ten times higher in the same cohort.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSIONS\\nPatients who have ERCP related perforations have longer hospital stays and have a higher mortality risk. Older patients and those who had ERCP in teaching hospitals are at a higher risk of perforation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minerva gastroenterologica e dietologica\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minerva gastroenterologica e dietologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S1121-421X.20.02718-X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva gastroenterologica e dietologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S1121-421X.20.02718-X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景肠穿孔是ERCP的一种罕见但令人恐惧的并发症。在这项研究中,我们使用一个大型的国家数据库来确定与ERCP相关的肠穿孔的患者和医院因素。我们还研究了肠道穿孔对医院预后的影响。方法数据来自全国住院患者样本,这是美国最大的公开住院护理数据库。ICD-9-CM 1998 - 2013年间所有ERCP手术的程序代码。我们感兴趣的主要结局是ERCP术后肠穿孔的发生率。次要结局包括住院时间和住院死亡率。结果在研究期间共进行了392,336例ERCP手术,符合我们的纳入标准,并进行了分析。样本的平均年龄为59岁,女性略高于60%。小规模医院占ercp的85%以上。肠穿孔发生率为每1000例ERCP手术1.2例。患者的年龄是唯一与穿孔显著相关的患者相关因素。(或:1.016;95% ci 1.009 - 1.025)。医院方面,教学状况是唯一与ERCP术后肠穿孔相关的医院相关因素(OR: 1.56;95% ci 1.28 -1.91)。在同一队列中,ERCP相关穿孔患者的住院时间要长得多,死亡风险高出10倍。结论ERCP相关穿孔患者住院时间较长,死亡风险较高。老年患者和在教学医院接受ERCP的患者有较高的穿孔风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Intestinal perforations after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the United States: a 16-year study using the national inpatient sample.
BACKGROUND Intestinal perforation is a rare but feared complication of ERCP. In this study, we identify patient and hospital factors for ERCP related intestinal perforation using a large national database. We also examine the effects of intestinal perforations on hospital outcomes. METHODS Data were obtained from the National Inpatient Sample, the largest publicly available inpatient care database in the United States. ICD-9-CM procedure codes for all ERCP procedures conducted between 1998 and 2013. Our primary outcome of interest was the incidence of intestinal perforations after ERCP. Secondary outcomes of interest included hospital length of stay and inpatient mortality. RESULTS A total of 392,336 ERCP procedures were performed over the study period, met our inclusion criteria, and were analyzed. Mean age of sample was 59 years and just over 60% were females. Low volume hospitals accounted for over 85% of ERCPs. Intestinal perforations occurred at a rate of 1.2 per 1000 ERCP procedures. Patient's age was the only patient-related factor significantly associated with perforation. (OR: 1.016; 95% CI 1.009 - 1.025). For hospitals, teaching status was the only hospital related factor associated with intestinal perforation after ERCP (OR: 1.56; 95% CI 1.28 -1.91). Length of stay was much longer in patients with ERCP related perforations and mortality risk was ten times higher in the same cohort. CONCLUSIONS Patients who have ERCP related perforations have longer hospital stays and have a higher mortality risk. Older patients and those who had ERCP in teaching hospitals are at a higher risk of perforation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Eosinophilic esophagitis: novel concepts regarding pathogenesis and clinical manifestations. Liver and spleen elastography as predictor of portal hypertension and esophageal varices. Bleeding peptic ulcer disease: over or through the scope clipping? Liver fibrosis in NAFLD patients: examining the opportunity to find a non-invasive, accurate and low-cost tool. What does liver elastography measure? Technical aspects and methodology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1