无地震动和有地震动的风压下砖石遗产建筑的性能

IF 0.9 Q4 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Australian Journal of Structural Engineering Pub Date : 2020-10-01 DOI:10.1080/13287982.2020.1842581
S. M. Anas, M. I. Ansari, M. Alam
{"title":"无地震动和有地震动的风压下砖石遗产建筑的性能","authors":"S. M. Anas, M. I. Ansari, M. Alam","doi":"10.1080/13287982.2020.1842581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In general, the blast-induced ground shock excites the foundation of the structure prior to the air-blast pressure because of the obvious reasons of difference in wave propagation velocities. However, the ground shock and air-blast pressure might act simultaneously on the structure for some standoff distance with a particular quantity of the explosive charge and cause severe damage than by air-blast pressure. Therefore, the ground shock and air-blast pressure both should be considered for estimating the structural response by such a near-field detonation. The objective of the present study is to assess the performance of the masonry heritage building under air-blast pressure without and with ground shock generated from on the ground spherical-shaped TNT explosive charge at varying standoff distances. The considered building is a heritage brick masonry structure in lime-surkhi mortar. The time lag between the ground shock and air-blast pressure for different scaled distances is evaluated. Stresses have been computed and are compared with the provisions of the Indian and Australian Standard Codes of Practice for Structural Use of Unreinforced Masonry. Also, the damage assessment has been carried out using the concrete-damaged plasticity (CDP) model available in the ABAQUS finite element program.","PeriodicalId":45617,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Structural Engineering","volume":"4 1","pages":"329 - 344"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"48","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance of masonry heritage building under air-blast pressure without and with ground shock\",\"authors\":\"S. M. Anas, M. I. Ansari, M. Alam\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13287982.2020.1842581\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In general, the blast-induced ground shock excites the foundation of the structure prior to the air-blast pressure because of the obvious reasons of difference in wave propagation velocities. However, the ground shock and air-blast pressure might act simultaneously on the structure for some standoff distance with a particular quantity of the explosive charge and cause severe damage than by air-blast pressure. Therefore, the ground shock and air-blast pressure both should be considered for estimating the structural response by such a near-field detonation. The objective of the present study is to assess the performance of the masonry heritage building under air-blast pressure without and with ground shock generated from on the ground spherical-shaped TNT explosive charge at varying standoff distances. The considered building is a heritage brick masonry structure in lime-surkhi mortar. The time lag between the ground shock and air-blast pressure for different scaled distances is evaluated. Stresses have been computed and are compared with the provisions of the Indian and Australian Standard Codes of Practice for Structural Use of Unreinforced Masonry. Also, the damage assessment has been carried out using the concrete-damaged plasticity (CDP) model available in the ABAQUS finite element program.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45617,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Structural Engineering\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"329 - 344\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"48\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Structural Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13287982.2020.1842581\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Structural Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13287982.2020.1842581","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 48

摘要

一般情况下,由于地震波传播速度差异的明显原因,爆炸诱发的地面冲击先于空气爆炸压力对结构基础进行激励。然而,在一定装药量下,地面冲击和空爆压力可能同时作用于一定距离的结构,造成比空爆压力更严重的破坏。因此,在估计这种近场爆轰作用下的结构响应时,应同时考虑地面冲击和空气爆炸压力。本研究的目的是评估在不同距离的地面球形TNT炸药装药产生的地面冲击和没有空气爆炸压力的情况下砌体遗产建筑的性能。考虑的建筑是石灰石砂浆的传统砖砌体结构。计算了不同尺度距离下地面冲击与空气爆炸压力之间的时间差。应力已经计算,并与印度和澳大利亚标准规范的规定进行了比较,用于结构使用的非加筋砌体。利用ABAQUS有限元程序中的混凝土损伤塑性(CDP)模型进行了损伤评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Performance of masonry heritage building under air-blast pressure without and with ground shock
ABSTRACT In general, the blast-induced ground shock excites the foundation of the structure prior to the air-blast pressure because of the obvious reasons of difference in wave propagation velocities. However, the ground shock and air-blast pressure might act simultaneously on the structure for some standoff distance with a particular quantity of the explosive charge and cause severe damage than by air-blast pressure. Therefore, the ground shock and air-blast pressure both should be considered for estimating the structural response by such a near-field detonation. The objective of the present study is to assess the performance of the masonry heritage building under air-blast pressure without and with ground shock generated from on the ground spherical-shaped TNT explosive charge at varying standoff distances. The considered building is a heritage brick masonry structure in lime-surkhi mortar. The time lag between the ground shock and air-blast pressure for different scaled distances is evaluated. Stresses have been computed and are compared with the provisions of the Indian and Australian Standard Codes of Practice for Structural Use of Unreinforced Masonry. Also, the damage assessment has been carried out using the concrete-damaged plasticity (CDP) model available in the ABAQUS finite element program.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: The Australian Journal of Structural Engineering (AJSE) is published under the auspices of the Structural College Board of Engineers Australia. It fulfils part of the Board''s mission for Continuing Professional Development. The journal also offers a means for exchange and interaction of scientific and professional issues and technical developments. The journal is open to members and non-members of Engineers Australia. Original papers on research and development (Technical Papers) and professional matters and achievements (Professional Papers) in all areas relevant to the science, art and practice of structural engineering are considered for possible publication. All papers and technical notes are peer-reviewed. The fundamental criterion for acceptance for publication is the intellectual and professional value of the contribution. Occasionally, papers previously published in essentially the same form elsewhere may be considered for publication. In this case acknowledgement to prior publication must be included in a footnote on page one of the manuscript. These papers are peer-reviewed as new submissions. The length of acceptable contributions typically should not exceed 4,000 to 5,000 word equivalents. Longer manuscripts may be considered at the discretion of the Editor. Technical Notes typically should not exceed about 1,000 word equivalents. Discussions on a Paper or Note published in the AJSE are welcomed. Discussions must address significant matters related to the content of a Paper or Technical Note and may include supplementary and critical comments and questions regarding content.
期刊最新文献
Uncertainty modelling and assessment of shear resistance in reinforced concrete beams without shear reinforcement Seismic isolation effect of tunable friction pendulum system in bridge Seismic performance of cold-formed thin-walled C-shaped steel composite wall with fireproof straw boards cladding Regression models for ultimate hogging moment prediction of composite cellular beams Performance of delaminated CFRP composite under pure bending using two-dimensional digital image correlation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1