开放教学法的好处和挑战:学生对写作开放案例研究的看法

IF 0.9 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Open Praxis Pub Date : 2023-05-09 DOI:10.55982/openpraxis.15.1.518
Deb Chen, C. Hendricks
{"title":"开放教学法的好处和挑战:学生对写作开放案例研究的看法","authors":"Deb Chen, C. Hendricks","doi":"10.55982/openpraxis.15.1.518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years there have been several studies reviewing the benefits and challenges of open pedagogy projects for student engagement and learning. This study adds to that literature by reporting on a survey of students who wrote case studies in three courses in forestry and conservation studies, most of whom agreed to publish publicly and with a Creative Commons license. Our results indicate that many students felt more motivated and engaged in the open pedagogy assignments compared to traditional assignments. Many also reported putting more effort into their assignment to ensure its accuracy and usefulness to others. In addition to improved understanding of copyright and citation practices, students learned how to translate knowledge for a broader audience and demonstrated an increased awareness of scholarly integrity. Still, a number of students reported increased stress with this assignment. We conclude with some recommendations to support students in such projects while reducing stress.","PeriodicalId":45611,"journal":{"name":"Open Praxis","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Open Pedagogy Benefits and Challenges: Student Perceptions of Writing Open Case Studies\",\"authors\":\"Deb Chen, C. Hendricks\",\"doi\":\"10.55982/openpraxis.15.1.518\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In recent years there have been several studies reviewing the benefits and challenges of open pedagogy projects for student engagement and learning. This study adds to that literature by reporting on a survey of students who wrote case studies in three courses in forestry and conservation studies, most of whom agreed to publish publicly and with a Creative Commons license. Our results indicate that many students felt more motivated and engaged in the open pedagogy assignments compared to traditional assignments. Many also reported putting more effort into their assignment to ensure its accuracy and usefulness to others. In addition to improved understanding of copyright and citation practices, students learned how to translate knowledge for a broader audience and demonstrated an increased awareness of scholarly integrity. Still, a number of students reported increased stress with this assignment. We conclude with some recommendations to support students in such projects while reducing stress.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45611,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Praxis\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Praxis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.15.1.518\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Praxis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.15.1.518","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,有几项研究回顾了开放教学法项目对学生参与和学习的好处和挑战。这项研究通过对学生的调查来补充这些文献,这些学生在林业和保护研究的三门课程中撰写案例研究,其中大多数人同意公开发表并使用知识共享许可。我们的研究结果表明,与传统作业相比,许多学生在开放式教学作业中感到更有动力和更投入。许多人还报告说,他们在作业中付出了更多的努力,以确保作业的准确性和对他人的有用性。除了提高对版权和引文实践的理解外,学生们还学会了如何将知识转化为更广泛的受众,并表现出更强的学术诚信意识。尽管如此,还是有一些学生报告说这项作业增加了他们的压力。最后,我们提出了一些建议,以帮助学生在完成这些项目的同时减轻压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Open Pedagogy Benefits and Challenges: Student Perceptions of Writing Open Case Studies
In recent years there have been several studies reviewing the benefits and challenges of open pedagogy projects for student engagement and learning. This study adds to that literature by reporting on a survey of students who wrote case studies in three courses in forestry and conservation studies, most of whom agreed to publish publicly and with a Creative Commons license. Our results indicate that many students felt more motivated and engaged in the open pedagogy assignments compared to traditional assignments. Many also reported putting more effort into their assignment to ensure its accuracy and usefulness to others. In addition to improved understanding of copyright and citation practices, students learned how to translate knowledge for a broader audience and demonstrated an increased awareness of scholarly integrity. Still, a number of students reported increased stress with this assignment. We conclude with some recommendations to support students in such projects while reducing stress.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Open Praxis
Open Praxis EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Intergovernmental Organisations (IGOs) and Governmental Open Educational Resources (OER) Policies: Instruments of International Policy Influence The Cost of Success: Exploring the Impact of Textbook Costs at a Hispanic-Serving R1 Institution Open Pedagogy Benefits and Challenges: Student Perceptions of Writing Open Case Studies Generative AI, Synthetic Contents, Open Educational Resources (OER), and Open Educational Practices (OEP): A New Front in the Openness Landscape Reusing Distance Courseware to Enable Blended Delivery: A New Zealand Case Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1