工程部门绩效评估的挑战:实证研究及进一步结果

M. Gepp, M. Amberg, S. Horn, T. Schaeffler
{"title":"工程部门绩效评估的挑战:实证研究及进一步结果","authors":"M. Gepp, M. Amberg, S. Horn, T. Schaeffler","doi":"10.1109/IEEM.2013.6962620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This contribution extends the results of an empirical study in the German plant manufacturing industry by a root cause analysis. Engineering plays a central role in the industrial value chain. Current assessments however do not consider its multiple impact in an adequate way. Since there is little literature about this topic - existing publications analyze performance from a technical-functional perspective or focus on design aspects - this study aims to evaluate performance criteria and challenges for performance assessments. 36 experts in the domain of plant engineering have been asked in a survey and personal interviews. Totally 13 challenges could be identified which oppose comprehensive assessments of engineering performance. A subsequent root cause analysis of these challenges - based on nine expert interviews - identified management practices, friction between technical and commercial functions in organizations and an unclear value proposition of engineering as underlying problems.","PeriodicalId":6454,"journal":{"name":"2013 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management","volume":"14 1","pages":"1299-1303"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Challenges of performance assessments for engineering departments: Empirical study and further results\",\"authors\":\"M. Gepp, M. Amberg, S. Horn, T. Schaeffler\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IEEM.2013.6962620\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This contribution extends the results of an empirical study in the German plant manufacturing industry by a root cause analysis. Engineering plays a central role in the industrial value chain. Current assessments however do not consider its multiple impact in an adequate way. Since there is little literature about this topic - existing publications analyze performance from a technical-functional perspective or focus on design aspects - this study aims to evaluate performance criteria and challenges for performance assessments. 36 experts in the domain of plant engineering have been asked in a survey and personal interviews. Totally 13 challenges could be identified which oppose comprehensive assessments of engineering performance. A subsequent root cause analysis of these challenges - based on nine expert interviews - identified management practices, friction between technical and commercial functions in organizations and an unclear value proposition of engineering as underlying problems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6454,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"1299-1303\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEM.2013.6962620\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEM.2013.6962620","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这一贡献通过根本原因分析扩展了德国工厂制造业实证研究的结果。工程在工业价值链中起着核心作用。然而,目前的评估没有充分考虑其多重影响。由于关于这一主题的文献很少-现有出版物从技术功能角度分析性能或侧重于设计方面-本研究旨在评估性能标准和性能评估的挑战。对36位工厂工程领域的专家进行了调查和个人访谈。对工程性能进行综合评价的挑战共有13项。随后对这些挑战的根本原因分析——基于9个专家访谈——确定了管理实践、组织中技术和商业功能之间的摩擦以及工程的不明确价值主张是潜在问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Challenges of performance assessments for engineering departments: Empirical study and further results
This contribution extends the results of an empirical study in the German plant manufacturing industry by a root cause analysis. Engineering plays a central role in the industrial value chain. Current assessments however do not consider its multiple impact in an adequate way. Since there is little literature about this topic - existing publications analyze performance from a technical-functional perspective or focus on design aspects - this study aims to evaluate performance criteria and challenges for performance assessments. 36 experts in the domain of plant engineering have been asked in a survey and personal interviews. Totally 13 challenges could be identified which oppose comprehensive assessments of engineering performance. A subsequent root cause analysis of these challenges - based on nine expert interviews - identified management practices, friction between technical and commercial functions in organizations and an unclear value proposition of engineering as underlying problems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Extension of the PROMETHEE Method to the Multicriteria Dual Clustering Problem On the Necessity for Improving Effectiveness of Qualification Process for Spare Parts Additive Manufacturing in a Circular Economy Supply Chain Selecting Temporary Flood Shelter Locations by P-Center Model A Feasible Schema Design Strategy for Amazon DynamoDB: A Nested Normal Form Approach Flood Shelters Location Using P-median Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1