高级持续性威胁的最优网络防御策略:博弈论分析

Jeffrey Acquaviva, Mark Mahon, Bruce Einfalt, T. LaPorta
{"title":"高级持续性威胁的最优网络防御策略:博弈论分析","authors":"Jeffrey Acquaviva, Mark Mahon, Bruce Einfalt, T. LaPorta","doi":"10.1109/SRDS.2017.29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We introduce a novel mathematical model that treats network security as a game between cyber attackers and network administrators. The model takes the form of a zero-sum repeated game where each sub-game corresponds to a possible state of the attacker. Our formulation views state as the set of compromised edges in a graph opposed to the more traditional node-based view. This provides a more expressive model since it allows the defender to anticipate the direction of attack. Both players move independently and in continuous time allowing for the possibility of one player moving several times before the other does. This model shows that defense-in-depth is not always a rational strategy for budget constrained network administrators. Furthermore, a defender can dissuade a rational attacker from attempting to attack a network if the defense budget is sufficiently high. This means that a network administrator does not need to make their system completely free of vulnerabilities, they only to ensure the penalties for being caught outweigh the potential rewards gained.","PeriodicalId":6475,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE 36th Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems (SRDS)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal Cyber-Defense Strategies for Advanced Persistent Threats: A Game Theoretical Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Jeffrey Acquaviva, Mark Mahon, Bruce Einfalt, T. LaPorta\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SRDS.2017.29\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We introduce a novel mathematical model that treats network security as a game between cyber attackers and network administrators. The model takes the form of a zero-sum repeated game where each sub-game corresponds to a possible state of the attacker. Our formulation views state as the set of compromised edges in a graph opposed to the more traditional node-based view. This provides a more expressive model since it allows the defender to anticipate the direction of attack. Both players move independently and in continuous time allowing for the possibility of one player moving several times before the other does. This model shows that defense-in-depth is not always a rational strategy for budget constrained network administrators. Furthermore, a defender can dissuade a rational attacker from attempting to attack a network if the defense budget is sufficiently high. This means that a network administrator does not need to make their system completely free of vulnerabilities, they only to ensure the penalties for being caught outweigh the potential rewards gained.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6475,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 IEEE 36th Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems (SRDS)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 IEEE 36th Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems (SRDS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SRDS.2017.29\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE 36th Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems (SRDS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SRDS.2017.29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

我们引入了一种新的数学模型,将网络安全视为网络攻击者和网络管理员之间的博弈。该模型采用零和重复博弈的形式,其中每个子博弈对应于攻击者的一种可能状态。我们的公式将状态视为图中妥协边的集合,而不是更传统的基于节点的视图。这提供了一个更具表现力的模型,因为它允许防守者预测攻击方向。两个玩家在连续的时间内独立移动,允许一个玩家在另一个玩家之前移动几次。该模型表明,对于预算有限的网络管理员来说,纵深防御并不总是一个合理的策略。此外,如果防御预算足够高,防御者可以阻止理性的攻击者尝试攻击网络。这意味着网络管理员不需要使他们的系统完全没有漏洞,他们只需要确保被发现的惩罚大于获得的潜在奖励。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Optimal Cyber-Defense Strategies for Advanced Persistent Threats: A Game Theoretical Analysis
We introduce a novel mathematical model that treats network security as a game between cyber attackers and network administrators. The model takes the form of a zero-sum repeated game where each sub-game corresponds to a possible state of the attacker. Our formulation views state as the set of compromised edges in a graph opposed to the more traditional node-based view. This provides a more expressive model since it allows the defender to anticipate the direction of attack. Both players move independently and in continuous time allowing for the possibility of one player moving several times before the other does. This model shows that defense-in-depth is not always a rational strategy for budget constrained network administrators. Furthermore, a defender can dissuade a rational attacker from attempting to attack a network if the defense budget is sufficiently high. This means that a network administrator does not need to make their system completely free of vulnerabilities, they only to ensure the penalties for being caught outweigh the potential rewards gained.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
PULP: Achieving Privacy and Utility Trade-Off in User Mobility Data On Availability for Blockchain-Based Systems Runtime Measurement Architecture for Bytecode Integrity in JVM-Based Cloud Performance Modeling of PBFT Consensus Process for Permissioned Blockchain Network (Hyperledger Fabric) CausalSpartan: Causal Consistency for Distributed Data Stores Using Hybrid Logical Clocks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1