根据UNIDROIT的经济和政治条件制定协调可再生能源碳排放法律文书的鹿特丹规则

IF 0.5 4区 社会学 Q3 LAW American Journal of Law & Medicine Pub Date : 2023-01-09 DOI:10.47672/ajl.1320
Z. Llarena
{"title":"根据UNIDROIT的经济和政治条件制定协调可再生能源碳排放法律文书的鹿特丹规则","authors":"Z. Llarena","doi":"10.47672/ajl.1320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Commercial transactions have binding obligatory and regulations that are restricted within a particular jurisdiction. However, the bill of lading for international carriage of goods must be performed and exercised resulting to extension of executory principles based on International Commercial Contracts (UNIDROIT) with a particular focus of interest on renewable energies for corporate economic goals towards sustainable development. This paper aims to develop statutory interpretation, based on Rotterdam Rules, to show the relationship between waste to energy technology and sustainable development. This helps in illustrating environmental tax for carbon emissions of energy management based on life cycle of drugs. \nMethodology: Life cycle of drugs involves contractual agreements pertaining to sustainable development and waste to energy technologies. Its carbon emissions must be properly controlled and diverted to renewable energies in order to fulfill the economic success and political safety of sustainable development. The carriage of goods by sea involves legal instruments, such as Hamburg, Hague, and Hague-Visby Rules under principles of International Commercial Contracts (UNIDROIT). Rotterdam Rules covers a broader spectrum and more substantial elements of regulatory functions encompassing Hague, Hague-Visby, and Hamburg Rules. \nFindings: Development of carbon tax is a statutory interpretation for economic success of the company towards philanthropic sustainable development in relation to public interests of human rights. Rotterdam Rules developed a means to enforce the substantial elements for validity of Hague, Hague-Visby, and Hamburg Rules in terms of carbon emissions for renewable energies based on sustainable development goals. Hence, the waste to energy technology provided a means of interpreting their economic progress in relation to law of the environment comparable to another jurisdiction. \nRecommendation: In order to achieve economic and political stability, there must be a functional equivalence between waste to energy technology and sustainable development, hence, carbon emissions from commercial transactions of International Carriage of Goods must not serve as an impediment to economic success based on laws of the company and the environment, thus, it must fulfill the goals of political sustainable development resulting to renewable energies.","PeriodicalId":7680,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Law & Medicine","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of Rotterdam Rules for Harmonisation of Legal Instruments based on Economic and Political Conditions of UNIDROIT for Renewable Energies of Carbon Emissions\",\"authors\":\"Z. Llarena\",\"doi\":\"10.47672/ajl.1320\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: Commercial transactions have binding obligatory and regulations that are restricted within a particular jurisdiction. However, the bill of lading for international carriage of goods must be performed and exercised resulting to extension of executory principles based on International Commercial Contracts (UNIDROIT) with a particular focus of interest on renewable energies for corporate economic goals towards sustainable development. This paper aims to develop statutory interpretation, based on Rotterdam Rules, to show the relationship between waste to energy technology and sustainable development. This helps in illustrating environmental tax for carbon emissions of energy management based on life cycle of drugs. \\nMethodology: Life cycle of drugs involves contractual agreements pertaining to sustainable development and waste to energy technologies. Its carbon emissions must be properly controlled and diverted to renewable energies in order to fulfill the economic success and political safety of sustainable development. The carriage of goods by sea involves legal instruments, such as Hamburg, Hague, and Hague-Visby Rules under principles of International Commercial Contracts (UNIDROIT). Rotterdam Rules covers a broader spectrum and more substantial elements of regulatory functions encompassing Hague, Hague-Visby, and Hamburg Rules. \\nFindings: Development of carbon tax is a statutory interpretation for economic success of the company towards philanthropic sustainable development in relation to public interests of human rights. Rotterdam Rules developed a means to enforce the substantial elements for validity of Hague, Hague-Visby, and Hamburg Rules in terms of carbon emissions for renewable energies based on sustainable development goals. Hence, the waste to energy technology provided a means of interpreting their economic progress in relation to law of the environment comparable to another jurisdiction. \\nRecommendation: In order to achieve economic and political stability, there must be a functional equivalence between waste to energy technology and sustainable development, hence, carbon emissions from commercial transactions of International Carriage of Goods must not serve as an impediment to economic success based on laws of the company and the environment, thus, it must fulfill the goals of political sustainable development resulting to renewable energies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Law & Medicine\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Law & Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47672/ajl.1320\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Law & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47672/ajl.1320","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

用途:商业交易在特定的司法管辖范围内具有约束力和强制性。但是,国际货物运输提单必须履行和行使,从而扩大以国际商事合同为基础的执行原则,特别注重可再生能源,以促进实现可持续发展的公司经济目标。本文旨在以鹿特丹规则为基础,发展法律解释,以显示废物转化为能源技术与可持续发展之间的关系。这有助于说明基于药物生命周期的能源管理碳排放环境税。方法:药物生命周期涉及与可持续发展和废物转化为能源技术有关的合同协议。中国的碳排放必须得到适当控制,并转向可再生能源,以实现可持续发展的经济成功和政治安全。海上货物运输涉及法律文书,如《汉堡规则》、《海牙规则》和《海牙-维斯比规则》(UNIDROIT)下的国际商事合同原则。《鹿特丹规则》涵盖了更广泛的监管职能和更实质性的要素,包括《海牙规则》、《海牙-维斯比规则》和《汉堡规则》。研究发现:碳税的发展是对公司在人权公共利益方面的慈善可持续发展的经济成功的法律解释。《鹿特丹规则》制定了一种手段,以执行《海牙规则》、《海牙-维斯比规则》和《汉堡规则》在基于可持续发展目标的可再生能源碳排放方面的实质性内容。因此,废物转化为能源的技术提供了一种解释其经济进步的方法,与其他司法管辖区的环境法相比较。建议:为了实现经济和政治的稳定,废物转化为能源的技术和可持续发展之间必须有一个功能上的等同,因此,国际货物运输商业交易的碳排放不能成为基于公司和环境法律的经济成功的障碍,因此,它必须实现政治可持续发展的目标,从而产生可再生能源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development of Rotterdam Rules for Harmonisation of Legal Instruments based on Economic and Political Conditions of UNIDROIT for Renewable Energies of Carbon Emissions
Purpose: Commercial transactions have binding obligatory and regulations that are restricted within a particular jurisdiction. However, the bill of lading for international carriage of goods must be performed and exercised resulting to extension of executory principles based on International Commercial Contracts (UNIDROIT) with a particular focus of interest on renewable energies for corporate economic goals towards sustainable development. This paper aims to develop statutory interpretation, based on Rotterdam Rules, to show the relationship between waste to energy technology and sustainable development. This helps in illustrating environmental tax for carbon emissions of energy management based on life cycle of drugs. Methodology: Life cycle of drugs involves contractual agreements pertaining to sustainable development and waste to energy technologies. Its carbon emissions must be properly controlled and diverted to renewable energies in order to fulfill the economic success and political safety of sustainable development. The carriage of goods by sea involves legal instruments, such as Hamburg, Hague, and Hague-Visby Rules under principles of International Commercial Contracts (UNIDROIT). Rotterdam Rules covers a broader spectrum and more substantial elements of regulatory functions encompassing Hague, Hague-Visby, and Hamburg Rules. Findings: Development of carbon tax is a statutory interpretation for economic success of the company towards philanthropic sustainable development in relation to public interests of human rights. Rotterdam Rules developed a means to enforce the substantial elements for validity of Hague, Hague-Visby, and Hamburg Rules in terms of carbon emissions for renewable energies based on sustainable development goals. Hence, the waste to energy technology provided a means of interpreting their economic progress in relation to law of the environment comparable to another jurisdiction. Recommendation: In order to achieve economic and political stability, there must be a functional equivalence between waste to energy technology and sustainable development, hence, carbon emissions from commercial transactions of International Carriage of Goods must not serve as an impediment to economic success based on laws of the company and the environment, thus, it must fulfill the goals of political sustainable development resulting to renewable energies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
16.70%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: desde Enero 2004 Último Numero: Octubre 2008 AJLM will solicit blind comments from expert peer reviewers, including faculty members of our editorial board, as well as from other preeminent health law and public policy academics and professionals from across the country and around the world.
期刊最新文献
A Protected Class, An Unprotected Condition, and A Biomarker - A Method/Formula for Increased Diversity in Clinical Trials for the African American Subject with Benign Ethnic Neutropenia (BEN) - CORRIGENDUM. "The Timeless Explosion of Fantasy's Dream": How State Courts Have Ignored the Supreme Court's Decision in Panetti v. Quarterman - ERRATUM. Mental Health Matters: A Look At Abortion Law Post-Dobbs - ERRATUM. Abortion Access for Women in Custody in the Wake of Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health. How The "Great Resignation" and COVID Unemployment Have Eroded the Employer Sponsored Insurance Model and Access to Healthcare.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1