圆锥角膜不同分期干眼的临床研究

Jing Du, Yong Li, Shengsheng Wei, Jing Li, Jian-guo Liu, Y. Wan
{"title":"圆锥角膜不同分期干眼的临床研究","authors":"Jing Du, Yong Li, Shengsheng Wei, Jing Li, Jian-guo Liu, Y. Wan","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1006-4443.2017.08.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo compare the dry eye characteristics of keratoconus at different stages and normal cornea. The dry eye features of keratoconus were analyzed. \n \n \nMethods \nCase-control study of 35 cases (44 eyes) of keratoconus were selected and divided into mild keratoconus 19 eyes, 15 cases with moderate keratoconus and 10 eyes with severe keratoconus according to Amsler-Krumeich grading method. Forty-four cases (44 eyes) as a normal corneal group. The dry eye characteristics were measured by the Keratograph dry eye comprehensive analyzer: First noninvasive tear break up time (NIBUT), mean NIBUT, tear river height, ocular index and meibomian gland absent area. And each patient was scored using the ocular surface disease index (OSDI) questionnaire. Using the T test, Wilcoxon rank sum test, variance analysis, Kruskal-Wallis H test. \n \n \nResults \nOSDI score of keratoconus group (40.96 ± 8.15) and normal cornea group (17.98 ± 5.50), the difference was statistically significant (t=10.864, P 0.05). There was no significant difference in the area of keratoconjunctival gland between different stages (F=1.555, P=0.226). \n \n \nConclusions \nThe study parameters indicate that keratoconus patients suffer greater symptoms and signs of dry eye, the difference of dry eye at different stages of keratoconus is significant. \n \n \nKey words: \nDry eye; Keratoconus; Dry eye comprehensive analyzer","PeriodicalId":10236,"journal":{"name":"中国实用眼科杂志","volume":"15 1","pages":"785-789"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical study on dry eye of keratoconus at different stages\",\"authors\":\"Jing Du, Yong Li, Shengsheng Wei, Jing Li, Jian-guo Liu, Y. Wan\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1006-4443.2017.08.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo compare the dry eye characteristics of keratoconus at different stages and normal cornea. The dry eye features of keratoconus were analyzed. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nCase-control study of 35 cases (44 eyes) of keratoconus were selected and divided into mild keratoconus 19 eyes, 15 cases with moderate keratoconus and 10 eyes with severe keratoconus according to Amsler-Krumeich grading method. Forty-four cases (44 eyes) as a normal corneal group. The dry eye characteristics were measured by the Keratograph dry eye comprehensive analyzer: First noninvasive tear break up time (NIBUT), mean NIBUT, tear river height, ocular index and meibomian gland absent area. And each patient was scored using the ocular surface disease index (OSDI) questionnaire. Using the T test, Wilcoxon rank sum test, variance analysis, Kruskal-Wallis H test. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nOSDI score of keratoconus group (40.96 ± 8.15) and normal cornea group (17.98 ± 5.50), the difference was statistically significant (t=10.864, P 0.05). There was no significant difference in the area of keratoconjunctival gland between different stages (F=1.555, P=0.226). \\n \\n \\nConclusions \\nThe study parameters indicate that keratoconus patients suffer greater symptoms and signs of dry eye, the difference of dry eye at different stages of keratoconus is significant. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nDry eye; Keratoconus; Dry eye comprehensive analyzer\",\"PeriodicalId\":10236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中国实用眼科杂志\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"785-789\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中国实用眼科杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1006-4443.2017.08.009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国实用眼科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1006-4443.2017.08.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的比较不同阶段圆锥角膜与正常角膜的干眼特征。分析圆锥角膜的干眼特征。方法选择35例(44眼)圆锥角膜,按Amsler-Krumeich分级法分为轻度圆锥角膜19眼、中度圆锥角膜15眼、重度圆锥角膜10眼。正常角膜组44例(44眼)。采用角膜镜干眼综合分析仪测量干眼特征:首次无创撕裂时间(NIBUT)、平均NIBUT、泪河高度、眼指数、睑板腺缺失面积。采用眼表疾病指数(OSDI)问卷对患者进行评分。采用T检验、Wilcoxon秩和检验、方差分析、Kruskal-Wallis H检验。结果圆锥角膜组OSDI评分(40.96±8.15)分与正常角膜组(17.98±5.50)分比较,差异有统计学意义(t=10.864, P 0.05)。不同分期患者角膜结膜腺面积差异无统计学意义(F=1.555, P=0.226)。结论研究参数提示圆锥角膜患者干眼症状和体征较大,不同阶段圆锥角膜干眼差异显著。关键词:干眼症;圆锥形角膜;干眼综合分析仪
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical study on dry eye of keratoconus at different stages
Objective To compare the dry eye characteristics of keratoconus at different stages and normal cornea. The dry eye features of keratoconus were analyzed. Methods Case-control study of 35 cases (44 eyes) of keratoconus were selected and divided into mild keratoconus 19 eyes, 15 cases with moderate keratoconus and 10 eyes with severe keratoconus according to Amsler-Krumeich grading method. Forty-four cases (44 eyes) as a normal corneal group. The dry eye characteristics were measured by the Keratograph dry eye comprehensive analyzer: First noninvasive tear break up time (NIBUT), mean NIBUT, tear river height, ocular index and meibomian gland absent area. And each patient was scored using the ocular surface disease index (OSDI) questionnaire. Using the T test, Wilcoxon rank sum test, variance analysis, Kruskal-Wallis H test. Results OSDI score of keratoconus group (40.96 ± 8.15) and normal cornea group (17.98 ± 5.50), the difference was statistically significant (t=10.864, P 0.05). There was no significant difference in the area of keratoconjunctival gland between different stages (F=1.555, P=0.226). Conclusions The study parameters indicate that keratoconus patients suffer greater symptoms and signs of dry eye, the difference of dry eye at different stages of keratoconus is significant. Key words: Dry eye; Keratoconus; Dry eye comprehensive analyzer
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9101
期刊介绍: China Practical Ophthalmology was founded in May 1983. It is supervised by the National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China, sponsored by the Chinese Medical Association and China Medical University, and publicly distributed at home and abroad. It is a national-level excellent core academic journal of comprehensive ophthalmology and a series of journals of the Chinese Medical Association. China Practical Ophthalmology aims to guide and improve the theoretical level and actual clinical diagnosis and treatment ability of frontline ophthalmologists in my country. It is characterized by close integration with clinical practice, and timely publishes academic articles and scientific research results with high practical value to clinicians, so that readers can understand and use them, improve the theoretical level and diagnosis and treatment ability of ophthalmologists, help and support their innovative development, and is deeply welcomed and loved by ophthalmologists and readers.
期刊最新文献
A survey of the effect of cataract operation in Pixian rural areas of Sichuan Compare the clinical effectiveness of silicone intubation for treating chronic dacryocystitis with different type silicone stents Exploration of the preventive effect of triamcinolone acetonide on posterior capsular opacification Investigation of visual and auditory perception in patients undergoing vitrectomy The management of ciliary block glaucoma in nanophthalmic patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1