生命周期养老模式的积累方法:实用优势

Y. Azoulay, A. Kudryavtsev, S. Shahrabani
{"title":"生命周期养老模式的积累方法:实用优势","authors":"Y. Azoulay, A. Kudryavtsev, S. Shahrabani","doi":"10.3326/FINTP.40.4.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the present study, we make an effort to enhance the practical advantages of the life-cycle pension model. We observe that previous studies are based on a “switching†approach, that is, on the assumption that when a pension fund member reaches a certain age, his accumulated savings are fully switched to another fund with a lower risk profile; we suggest an “accumulating†approach, according to which, at the same age, the member’s previously accumulated wealth continues to be invested in the same fund, while his new regular pension contributions start being directed to another (less risky) fund. We consider a hypothetical (average) Israeli employee, analyze two age-dependent life-cycle investment distributions of his pension savings, and perform a comparison between the two approaches to the life-cycle model by employing an estimation-based and a simulation-based technique. The results demonstrate that the “accumulating†approach provides: (i) higher estimated annualized real returns and real accumulated savings; (ii) significantly higher simulated mean and median values of real accumulated savings. Moreover, we document that, though the “accumulating†approach increases the standard deviation of total savings, it does not lead to critically low pension wealth levels even for relatively unfavorable sequences of financial assets’ returns. Therefore, we conclude that the “accumulating†approach to the life-cycle model has a potential significantly to increase pension fund members’ total accumulated wealth relatively to the common “switching†approach, without significantly increasing the members’ risk.","PeriodicalId":30016,"journal":{"name":"Financial Theory and Practice","volume":"29 1","pages":"413-436"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accumulating approach to the life-cycle pension model: practical advantages\",\"authors\":\"Y. Azoulay, A. Kudryavtsev, S. Shahrabani\",\"doi\":\"10.3326/FINTP.40.4.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the present study, we make an effort to enhance the practical advantages of the life-cycle pension model. We observe that previous studies are based on a “switching†approach, that is, on the assumption that when a pension fund member reaches a certain age, his accumulated savings are fully switched to another fund with a lower risk profile; we suggest an “accumulating†approach, according to which, at the same age, the member’s previously accumulated wealth continues to be invested in the same fund, while his new regular pension contributions start being directed to another (less risky) fund. We consider a hypothetical (average) Israeli employee, analyze two age-dependent life-cycle investment distributions of his pension savings, and perform a comparison between the two approaches to the life-cycle model by employing an estimation-based and a simulation-based technique. The results demonstrate that the “accumulating†approach provides: (i) higher estimated annualized real returns and real accumulated savings; (ii) significantly higher simulated mean and median values of real accumulated savings. Moreover, we document that, though the “accumulating†approach increases the standard deviation of total savings, it does not lead to critically low pension wealth levels even for relatively unfavorable sequences of financial assets’ returns. Therefore, we conclude that the “accumulating†approach to the life-cycle model has a potential significantly to increase pension fund members’ total accumulated wealth relatively to the common “switching†approach, without significantly increasing the members’ risk.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30016,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Financial Theory and Practice\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"413-436\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Financial Theory and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3326/FINTP.40.4.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Financial Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3326/FINTP.40.4.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

在本研究中,我们努力增强生命周期养老金模型的实用优势。我们观察到,以前的研究是基于一个€œswitchingâ€方法,即假设当养老基金成员达到一定年龄时,他积累的储蓄全部转移到另一个风险较低的基金;我们建议采用一种 - œaccumulatingâ -方法,根据这种方法,在同一年龄,成员以前积累的财富继续投资于同一基金,而他的新定期养老金缴款开始被引导到另一个(风险较低的)基金。我们考虑一个假设的(平均)以色列雇员,分析他的养老金储蓄的两种年龄依赖的生命周期投资分布,并通过采用基于估计和基于模拟的技术对生命周期模型的两种方法进行比较。结果表明,€œaccumulatingâ€方法提供:(i)更高的估计年化实际收益和实际累计储蓄;(ii)实际累积储蓄的模拟平均值和中位数显著提高。此外,我们证明,尽管€œaccumulatingâ€方法增加了总储蓄的标准差,但即使对于相对不利的金融资产€™回报序列,它也不会导致养老金财富水平极低。因此,我们得出结论,相对于常见的€œswitchingâ€方法,生命周期模型的€œaccumulatingâ€方法有可能显著增加养老基金成员的累积财富总量,而不会显著增加成员的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Accumulating approach to the life-cycle pension model: practical advantages
In the present study, we make an effort to enhance the practical advantages of the life-cycle pension model. We observe that previous studies are based on a “switching†approach, that is, on the assumption that when a pension fund member reaches a certain age, his accumulated savings are fully switched to another fund with a lower risk profile; we suggest an “accumulating†approach, according to which, at the same age, the member’s previously accumulated wealth continues to be invested in the same fund, while his new regular pension contributions start being directed to another (less risky) fund. We consider a hypothetical (average) Israeli employee, analyze two age-dependent life-cycle investment distributions of his pension savings, and perform a comparison between the two approaches to the life-cycle model by employing an estimation-based and a simulation-based technique. The results demonstrate that the “accumulating†approach provides: (i) higher estimated annualized real returns and real accumulated savings; (ii) significantly higher simulated mean and median values of real accumulated savings. Moreover, we document that, though the “accumulating†approach increases the standard deviation of total savings, it does not lead to critically low pension wealth levels even for relatively unfavorable sequences of financial assets’ returns. Therefore, we conclude that the “accumulating†approach to the life-cycle model has a potential significantly to increase pension fund members’ total accumulated wealth relatively to the common “switching†approach, without significantly increasing the members’ risk.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Addendum: In search of the egalitarian syndrome: cultural inertia in Croatia? List of articles published in “Financial Theory and Practice”, vol. 40, 2016 In search of the egalitarian syndrome: cultural inertia in Croatia? Accumulating approach to the life-cycle pension model: practical advantages The impact of population aging on public finance in the European Union
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1