IF 0.2 0 PHILOSOPHY HYBRIS Revista de Filosofia Pub Date : 2020-06-30 DOI:10.18778/1689-4286.49.04
Michał Kruszelnicki, Wojciech Kruszelnicki
{"title":"Zupełnie inaczej. Nad książką \"Nekrofilna produkcja akademicka i pieśni partyzantów\" Oskara Szwabowskiego","authors":"Michał Kruszelnicki, Wojciech Kruszelnicki","doi":"10.18778/1689-4286.49.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article comments the stronger and the more disputable points of Oskar Szwabowski’s book Necrofiliac Academic Production and the Songs of Partisans (2019). The authors engage in a polemics with the assertion that autoethnography is able to depict more efficiently than other scientific discourses the reality of the university after the neo-liberal reforms. We also oppose „the workers’ perspective” MICHAŁ KRUSZELNICKI, WOJCIECH KRUSZELNICKI ZUPEŁNIE INACZEJ... [94] as promoted by O. Szwabowski, which is to replace the traditional view of the university as an elitist site and of the faculty as a particularly privileged class. Further, the article points out at certain shortcomings of theoretical Marxism which O. Szwabowski uses to criticize and envision the change of the functioning of the academic milieu along with the transformation of the very way we perceive social research – from an individualistic and competetive perspective, to one that is collective and geared in social engagement and intervention. Ultimately, we charge Oskar Szwabowski with an inconsistency which amounts to a contradiction between his notorious call upon academics to realize that the university has become a mass-production company, and the faculty have been turned into the new proletariat, and his resonant grievance upon the poor conditions of work therein. Słowa kluczowe: uniwersytet, marksizm, autoetnografia, alienacja, edukacja, szkolnictwo wyższe, krytyka neoliberalizmu, konserwatyzm","PeriodicalId":30478,"journal":{"name":"HYBRIS Revista de Filosofia","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HYBRIS Revista de Filosofia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18778/1689-4286.49.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对奥斯卡·斯瓦博斯基的《死党学术生产与游击队之歌》(2019)一书中更有力、更有争议的观点进行了评论。作者断言,与其他科学话语相比,自我民族志能够更有效地描述新自由主义改革后大学的现实,这是一场论战。我们也反对“工人的观点”MICHAŁ KRUSZELNICKI, WOJCIECH KRUSZELNICKI ZUPEŁNIE INACZEJ…[94]由O. Szwabowski倡导,它将取代传统的观点,即大学是精英的场所,教师是特殊特权阶层。此外,文章指出了理论马克思主义的某些缺陷,O.施瓦博斯基用这些缺陷来批评和设想学术环境的功能变化,以及我们看待社会研究的方式的转变——从个人主义和竞争的角度,到集体的、与社会参与和干预相结合的角度。最后,我们指责奥斯卡·斯瓦博夫斯基自相矛盾,他臭名昭著地呼吁学者们认识到大学已经变成了一个大规模生产的公司,教师们已经变成了新的无产阶级,而他对大学恶劣的工作条件却产生了共鸣。Słowa kluczowe: uniwersystem, marksizm, autoetnografia, alienacja, edukacja, szkolnictwo wyższe, krytyka neoliberalizmu, konserwatyzm
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Zupełnie inaczej. Nad książką "Nekrofilna produkcja akademicka i pieśni partyzantów" Oskara Szwabowskiego
The article comments the stronger and the more disputable points of Oskar Szwabowski’s book Necrofiliac Academic Production and the Songs of Partisans (2019). The authors engage in a polemics with the assertion that autoethnography is able to depict more efficiently than other scientific discourses the reality of the university after the neo-liberal reforms. We also oppose „the workers’ perspective” MICHAŁ KRUSZELNICKI, WOJCIECH KRUSZELNICKI ZUPEŁNIE INACZEJ... [94] as promoted by O. Szwabowski, which is to replace the traditional view of the university as an elitist site and of the faculty as a particularly privileged class. Further, the article points out at certain shortcomings of theoretical Marxism which O. Szwabowski uses to criticize and envision the change of the functioning of the academic milieu along with the transformation of the very way we perceive social research – from an individualistic and competetive perspective, to one that is collective and geared in social engagement and intervention. Ultimately, we charge Oskar Szwabowski with an inconsistency which amounts to a contradiction between his notorious call upon academics to realize that the university has become a mass-production company, and the faculty have been turned into the new proletariat, and his resonant grievance upon the poor conditions of work therein. Słowa kluczowe: uniwersytet, marksizm, autoetnografia, alienacja, edukacja, szkolnictwo wyższe, krytyka neoliberalizmu, konserwatyzm
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Teologiczne konsekwencje darwinizmu — „Bóg Darwina” Corneliusa G. Huntera Co to za świat? The Limits of Liberalism. Tradition, Individualism, and the crisis of freedom, Mark. T. Mitchell, University of Notre Dame Press, Indiana 2019, ss. 328 – Artykuł Recenzyjny Teoria interpretacji Paula Ricoeura i Hansa-Georga Gadamera. Analiza porównawcza Ideologia w edukacji. Spojrzenie opisowe, negatywne i pozytywne na przykładzie wybranych stanowisk pedagogiki katolickiej i krytycznej
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1