超限虹膜:解决阶梯索引分离逻辑的存在困境

Simon Spies, Lennard Gäher, Daniel Gratzer, Joseph Tassarotti, R. Krebbers, Derek Dreyer, L. Birkedal
{"title":"超限虹膜:解决阶梯索引分离逻辑的存在困境","authors":"Simon Spies, Lennard Gäher, Daniel Gratzer, Joseph Tassarotti, R. Krebbers, Derek Dreyer, L. Birkedal","doi":"10.1145/3453483.3454031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Step-indexed separation logic has proven to be a powerful tool for modular reasoning about higher-order stateful programs. However, it has only been used to reason about safety properties, never liveness properties. In this paper, we observe that the inability of step-indexed separation logic to support liveness properties stems fundamentally from its failure to validate the existential property, connecting the meaning of existential quantification inside and outside the logic. We show how to validate the existential property—and thus enable liveness reasoning—by moving from finite step-indices (natural numbers) to transfinite step-indices (ordinals). Concretely, we transform the Coq-based step-indexed logic Iris to Transfinite Iris, and demonstrate its effectiveness in proving termination and termination-preserving refinement for higher-order stateful programs.","PeriodicalId":20557,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 42nd ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation","volume":"74 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transfinite Iris: resolving an existential dilemma of step-indexed separation logic\",\"authors\":\"Simon Spies, Lennard Gäher, Daniel Gratzer, Joseph Tassarotti, R. Krebbers, Derek Dreyer, L. Birkedal\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3453483.3454031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Step-indexed separation logic has proven to be a powerful tool for modular reasoning about higher-order stateful programs. However, it has only been used to reason about safety properties, never liveness properties. In this paper, we observe that the inability of step-indexed separation logic to support liveness properties stems fundamentally from its failure to validate the existential property, connecting the meaning of existential quantification inside and outside the logic. We show how to validate the existential property—and thus enable liveness reasoning—by moving from finite step-indices (natural numbers) to transfinite step-indices (ordinals). Concretely, we transform the Coq-based step-indexed logic Iris to Transfinite Iris, and demonstrate its effectiveness in proving termination and termination-preserving refinement for higher-order stateful programs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20557,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 42nd ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation\",\"volume\":\"74 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 42nd ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3453483.3454031\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 42nd ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3453483.3454031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

步骤索引分离逻辑已被证明是对高阶有状态程序进行模块化推理的强大工具。然而,它只被用来推断安全属性,而从未被用来推断生活属性。在本文中,我们观察到阶梯索引分离逻辑无法支持活动属性的根本原因是它无法验证存在属性,连接逻辑内外存在量化的意义。我们展示了如何通过从有限阶跃指数(自然数)到超越阶跃指数(序数)来验证存在性——从而实现活推理。具体而言,我们将基于coq的阶跃索引逻辑虹膜转化为超限虹膜,并证明了其在证明高阶有状态程序的终止和保持终止精化方面的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Transfinite Iris: resolving an existential dilemma of step-indexed separation logic
Step-indexed separation logic has proven to be a powerful tool for modular reasoning about higher-order stateful programs. However, it has only been used to reason about safety properties, never liveness properties. In this paper, we observe that the inability of step-indexed separation logic to support liveness properties stems fundamentally from its failure to validate the existential property, connecting the meaning of existential quantification inside and outside the logic. We show how to validate the existential property—and thus enable liveness reasoning—by moving from finite step-indices (natural numbers) to transfinite step-indices (ordinals). Concretely, we transform the Coq-based step-indexed logic Iris to Transfinite Iris, and demonstrate its effectiveness in proving termination and termination-preserving refinement for higher-order stateful programs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Learning to find naming issues with big code and small supervision Cyclic program synthesis Fluid: a framework for approximate concurrency via controlled dependency relaxation Bliss: auto-tuning complex applications using a pool of diverse lightweight learning models Phased synthesis of divide and conquer programs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1