造型设计质量

K. Klingsheim, E.J. Aas
{"title":"造型设计质量","authors":"K. Klingsheim, E.J. Aas","doi":"10.1109/RMCAE.1992.245526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several qualitative and quantitative perspectives on design quality are presented. An analogy between testing and design verification is demonstrated, leading towards a quantitative metric for \"design incorrectness\" equivalent to the \"defect level\" in digital testing. The focus is on the design process and the probability for error insertion, rather than detecting existing stuck-line faults. We demonstrate that pursuing this avenue will lead to practical means of assessing and predicting the quality of designs, as well as designers, in real-life product development.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":59272,"journal":{"name":"计算机辅助工程","volume":"38 1","pages":"173-181"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modeling design quality\",\"authors\":\"K. Klingsheim, E.J. Aas\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/RMCAE.1992.245526\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Several qualitative and quantitative perspectives on design quality are presented. An analogy between testing and design verification is demonstrated, leading towards a quantitative metric for \\\"design incorrectness\\\" equivalent to the \\\"defect level\\\" in digital testing. The focus is on the design process and the probability for error insertion, rather than detecting existing stuck-line faults. We demonstrate that pursuing this avenue will lead to practical means of assessing and predicting the quality of designs, as well as designers, in real-life product development.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":59272,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"计算机辅助工程\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"173-181\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1992-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"计算机辅助工程\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1087\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/RMCAE.1992.245526\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"计算机辅助工程","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RMCAE.1992.245526","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

提出了设计质量的几个定性和定量的观点。测试和设计验证之间的类比被证明,导致“设计不正确性”的定量度量等同于数字测试中的“缺陷级别”。重点是设计过程和错误插入的概率,而不是检测现有的卡线故障。我们证明,在现实生活的产品开发中,追求这一途径将导致评估和预测设计质量的实用手段,以及设计师。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Modeling design quality
Several qualitative and quantitative perspectives on design quality are presented. An analogy between testing and design verification is demonstrated, leading towards a quantitative metric for "design incorrectness" equivalent to the "defect level" in digital testing. The focus is on the design process and the probability for error insertion, rather than detecting existing stuck-line faults. We demonstrate that pursuing this avenue will lead to practical means of assessing and predicting the quality of designs, as well as designers, in real-life product development.<>
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2892
期刊最新文献
Multi-enterprise concurrent engineering through product data standards Automated reliability predictions and derating analysis in the concurrent engineering environment Principles of requirement management automation How we put reliability tools in the hands of the designer-the technical issues Supporting R&M in a concurrent engineering environment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1