U. Bhatt, P. Sharma, Upadhyayula Suryanarayana Murty, Subhamoy Banerjee
{"title":"熔融沉积建模介导的3D打印熔融挤压长丝的系统评价","authors":"U. Bhatt, P. Sharma, Upadhyayula Suryanarayana Murty, Subhamoy Banerjee","doi":"10.2217/3dp-2021-0031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The significant critical barrier in the ascension of fused deposition modeling (FDM) into a scalable technology is the lack of defined quality benchmarks for validating filament performance. To avoid this issue, we aimed to create a comprehensive quantitative approach providing a road map to evaluate the fabricated filament for successful FDM 3D printing. Materials & methods: A detailed in vitro physico-technological analysis including axial as well as oscillatory stress tests were performed to validate the melt-extruded filament. Results & conclusion: The results from the above noted tests as well as microscopic examinations suggested toward the superiority of 6.5% plasticizer-loaded drug-polymer filaments in terms of mechanical prerequisites like feedability, extrudability and printability, as well as complete molecular homogenization.","PeriodicalId":73578,"journal":{"name":"Journal of 3D printing in medicine","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematic evaluations of melt-extruded filament for fused deposition modeling-mediated 3D printing\",\"authors\":\"U. Bhatt, P. Sharma, Upadhyayula Suryanarayana Murty, Subhamoy Banerjee\",\"doi\":\"10.2217/3dp-2021-0031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: The significant critical barrier in the ascension of fused deposition modeling (FDM) into a scalable technology is the lack of defined quality benchmarks for validating filament performance. To avoid this issue, we aimed to create a comprehensive quantitative approach providing a road map to evaluate the fabricated filament for successful FDM 3D printing. Materials & methods: A detailed in vitro physico-technological analysis including axial as well as oscillatory stress tests were performed to validate the melt-extruded filament. Results & conclusion: The results from the above noted tests as well as microscopic examinations suggested toward the superiority of 6.5% plasticizer-loaded drug-polymer filaments in terms of mechanical prerequisites like feedability, extrudability and printability, as well as complete molecular homogenization.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73578,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of 3D printing in medicine\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of 3D printing in medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2217/3dp-2021-0031\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of 3D printing in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2217/3dp-2021-0031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Systematic evaluations of melt-extruded filament for fused deposition modeling-mediated 3D printing
Aim: The significant critical barrier in the ascension of fused deposition modeling (FDM) into a scalable technology is the lack of defined quality benchmarks for validating filament performance. To avoid this issue, we aimed to create a comprehensive quantitative approach providing a road map to evaluate the fabricated filament for successful FDM 3D printing. Materials & methods: A detailed in vitro physico-technological analysis including axial as well as oscillatory stress tests were performed to validate the melt-extruded filament. Results & conclusion: The results from the above noted tests as well as microscopic examinations suggested toward the superiority of 6.5% plasticizer-loaded drug-polymer filaments in terms of mechanical prerequisites like feedability, extrudability and printability, as well as complete molecular homogenization.