自发报告系统在评估和监测药物安全中的作用不断演变

Q4 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics PharmacoVigilance Review Pub Date : 2018-11-05 DOI:10.5772/INTECHOPEN.79986
E. Raschi, U. Moretti, F. Salvo, A. Pariente, I. Antonazzo, F. Ponti, E. Poluzzi
{"title":"自发报告系统在评估和监测药物安全中的作用不断演变","authors":"E. Raschi, U. Moretti, F. Salvo, A. Pariente, I. Antonazzo, F. Ponti, E. Poluzzi","doi":"10.5772/INTECHOPEN.79986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter aims to describe current and emerging roles of spontaneous reporting systems (SRSs) for assessing and monitoring drug safety. Moreover, it offers a perspective on the near future, which entails the so-called era of Big Data, keeping in mind both regulator and researcher viewpoints. After a panorama on key data sources and analyses of post-marketing data of adverse drug reactions, a critical appraisal of methodological issues and debated future applications of SRSs will be presented, including the exploitation and challenges in evidence integration (i.e., merging and combining heterogeneous sources of data into a unique indicator of risk) and patient’s reporting via social media. Finally, a call for a responsible use of these studies is offered, with a proposal on a set of minimum requirements to assess the quality of disproportionality analysis in terms of study conception, performing and reporting.","PeriodicalId":39098,"journal":{"name":"PharmacoVigilance Review","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"27","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evolving Roles of Spontaneous Reporting Systems to Assess and Monitor Drug Safety\",\"authors\":\"E. Raschi, U. Moretti, F. Salvo, A. Pariente, I. Antonazzo, F. Ponti, E. Poluzzi\",\"doi\":\"10.5772/INTECHOPEN.79986\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter aims to describe current and emerging roles of spontaneous reporting systems (SRSs) for assessing and monitoring drug safety. Moreover, it offers a perspective on the near future, which entails the so-called era of Big Data, keeping in mind both regulator and researcher viewpoints. After a panorama on key data sources and analyses of post-marketing data of adverse drug reactions, a critical appraisal of methodological issues and debated future applications of SRSs will be presented, including the exploitation and challenges in evidence integration (i.e., merging and combining heterogeneous sources of data into a unique indicator of risk) and patient’s reporting via social media. Finally, a call for a responsible use of these studies is offered, with a proposal on a set of minimum requirements to assess the quality of disproportionality analysis in terms of study conception, performing and reporting.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39098,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PharmacoVigilance Review\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"27\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PharmacoVigilance Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5772/INTECHOPEN.79986\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PharmacoVigilance Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5772/INTECHOPEN.79986","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

摘要

本章旨在描述当前和新兴的自发报告系统(srs)在评估和监测药物安全性方面的作用。此外,它还提供了一个关于不久的未来的视角,即所谓的大数据时代,同时考虑到监管机构和研究人员的观点。在全面介绍了关键数据源和药物不良反应上市后数据的分析之后,将对srs的方法学问题和有争议的未来应用进行批判性评估,包括证据整合(即将异质数据来源合并和组合成独特的风险指标)和患者通过社交媒体报告的开发和挑战。最后,呼吁负责任地使用这些研究,并建议在研究概念、执行和报告方面评估不成比例分析质量的一套最低要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evolving Roles of Spontaneous Reporting Systems to Assess and Monitor Drug Safety
This chapter aims to describe current and emerging roles of spontaneous reporting systems (SRSs) for assessing and monitoring drug safety. Moreover, it offers a perspective on the near future, which entails the so-called era of Big Data, keeping in mind both regulator and researcher viewpoints. After a panorama on key data sources and analyses of post-marketing data of adverse drug reactions, a critical appraisal of methodological issues and debated future applications of SRSs will be presented, including the exploitation and challenges in evidence integration (i.e., merging and combining heterogeneous sources of data into a unique indicator of risk) and patient’s reporting via social media. Finally, a call for a responsible use of these studies is offered, with a proposal on a set of minimum requirements to assess the quality of disproportionality analysis in terms of study conception, performing and reporting.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PharmacoVigilance Review
PharmacoVigilance Review Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pharmacovigilance in Pediatric Population Introductory Chapter: Pharmacovigilance Active Pharmacovigilance in Epileptic Patients: A Deep Insight into Phenytoin Behaviour Evolving Roles of Spontaneous Reporting Systems to Assess and Monitor Drug Safety
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1