S. Omara, C. Glashan, BJ Tofig, Q. Tao, SA Blom, J. Nielsen, P. Lukac, S. Kristiansen, R. van der Geest, K. Zeppenfeld
{"title":"通过离体高分辨率心脏磁共振验证评估多尺寸电极在缺血性心肌病中的视野","authors":"S. Omara, C. Glashan, BJ Tofig, Q. Tao, SA Blom, J. Nielsen, P. Lukac, S. Kristiansen, R. van der Geest, K. Zeppenfeld","doi":"10.1093/europace/euac053.344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Type of funding sources: Public hospital(s). Main funding source(s): Leiden University Medical Centre\n \n \n \n Substrate identification after myocardial infarction (MI) relies on voltage mapping. Early reperfusion results in non-transmural scar (NTS). Narrow-spaced microelectrodes (ME) are thought to have a limited field of view (FOV). The role of ME for delineation of NTS is unclear.\n \n \n \n To evaluate mapping with multi-size electrodes for identifying NTS, validated against high-resolution ex-vivo cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (HR-LGE-CMR).\n \n \n \n Nine swine with early reperfusion MI underwent endocardial electroanatomical voltage mapping (EAVM) with the QDOT catheter which incorporates three ME in the 3.5mm tip electrode. HR-LGE-CMR (0.3mm slices) were obtained and merged with EAVM. At each EAVM point a transmural cylinder (5mm radius) was projected on the CMR and the volume of viable myocardium (VM) in the cylinder quantified (Otsu method). Unipolar (UV) and bipolar (BV) voltages from conventional (c) and microelectrodes (µ) were related to VM. Cut-off values for normal myocardium were based on 5th percentiles of areas without fibrosis.\n \n \n \n In each swine 220 (IQR 216-260) mapping points were collected (total 2322 points). Cut-off for normal myocardium were 3.18 mV, 0.85 mV, 3.28mV and 1.93 mV for UVc, BVc, UVµ and BVµ, respectively. Wall thickness (WT) was reduced in areas with fibrosis vs. no fibrosis (5.4mm, IQR 3.2- 6.9 vs. 7.4mm, IQR 5.3 - 9.6). All voltages were reduced at sites with fibrosis vs. no fibrosis (UVs 4.4mV vs. 6.8mV; BVc 1.2mV vs. 2.1mV; UVµ 2.5mV vs. 5.5mV, and BVµ 2.9mV vs. 5.4mV, all p<0.001).\n For areas with any fibrosis, all voltages increased with increasing WT up to the maximal WT of 13mm (fig. 1). Similarly, all voltages increased with an increase in VM volumes from >200mm3 to >600 mm3 (equivalent to a cylinder with h=7.64mm) (fig. 2) with the strongest correlation for UVµ (r=0.47). Below a volume of 200mm3 VM voltages did not correlate significantly with VM.\n \n \n \n In NTS, UVc, BVc, and, notably, BVµ and UVµ increase with increasing WT and increasing transmural volume of VM, with the biggest role perhaps laid out for UVµ to estimate transmural VM. EAVM cannot accurately delineate areas with the lowest amount of VM, potentially due to insufficient far field cancellation in NTS. Both these findings argue against a limited FOV of ME.\n","PeriodicalId":11720,"journal":{"name":"EP Europace","volume":"91 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the field of view of multisize electrodes in ischemic cardiomyopathy by validating against ex-vivo high resolution cardiac magnetic resonance\",\"authors\":\"S. Omara, C. Glashan, BJ Tofig, Q. Tao, SA Blom, J. Nielsen, P. Lukac, S. Kristiansen, R. van der Geest, K. Zeppenfeld\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/europace/euac053.344\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n Type of funding sources: Public hospital(s). Main funding source(s): Leiden University Medical Centre\\n \\n \\n \\n Substrate identification after myocardial infarction (MI) relies on voltage mapping. Early reperfusion results in non-transmural scar (NTS). Narrow-spaced microelectrodes (ME) are thought to have a limited field of view (FOV). The role of ME for delineation of NTS is unclear.\\n \\n \\n \\n To evaluate mapping with multi-size electrodes for identifying NTS, validated against high-resolution ex-vivo cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (HR-LGE-CMR).\\n \\n \\n \\n Nine swine with early reperfusion MI underwent endocardial electroanatomical voltage mapping (EAVM) with the QDOT catheter which incorporates three ME in the 3.5mm tip electrode. HR-LGE-CMR (0.3mm slices) were obtained and merged with EAVM. At each EAVM point a transmural cylinder (5mm radius) was projected on the CMR and the volume of viable myocardium (VM) in the cylinder quantified (Otsu method). Unipolar (UV) and bipolar (BV) voltages from conventional (c) and microelectrodes (µ) were related to VM. Cut-off values for normal myocardium were based on 5th percentiles of areas without fibrosis.\\n \\n \\n \\n In each swine 220 (IQR 216-260) mapping points were collected (total 2322 points). Cut-off for normal myocardium were 3.18 mV, 0.85 mV, 3.28mV and 1.93 mV for UVc, BVc, UVµ and BVµ, respectively. Wall thickness (WT) was reduced in areas with fibrosis vs. no fibrosis (5.4mm, IQR 3.2- 6.9 vs. 7.4mm, IQR 5.3 - 9.6). All voltages were reduced at sites with fibrosis vs. no fibrosis (UVs 4.4mV vs. 6.8mV; BVc 1.2mV vs. 2.1mV; UVµ 2.5mV vs. 5.5mV, and BVµ 2.9mV vs. 5.4mV, all p<0.001).\\n For areas with any fibrosis, all voltages increased with increasing WT up to the maximal WT of 13mm (fig. 1). Similarly, all voltages increased with an increase in VM volumes from >200mm3 to >600 mm3 (equivalent to a cylinder with h=7.64mm) (fig. 2) with the strongest correlation for UVµ (r=0.47). Below a volume of 200mm3 VM voltages did not correlate significantly with VM.\\n \\n \\n \\n In NTS, UVc, BVc, and, notably, BVµ and UVµ increase with increasing WT and increasing transmural volume of VM, with the biggest role perhaps laid out for UVµ to estimate transmural VM. EAVM cannot accurately delineate areas with the lowest amount of VM, potentially due to insufficient far field cancellation in NTS. Both these findings argue against a limited FOV of ME.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":11720,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EP Europace\",\"volume\":\"91 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EP Europace\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euac053.344\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EP Europace","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euac053.344","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
资金来源类型:公立医院。主要资助来源:莱顿大学医学中心心肌梗死(MI)后底物识别依赖于电压映射。早期再灌注导致非跨壁瘢痕(NTS)。窄间距微电极(ME)被认为具有有限的视野(FOV)。ME在NTS诊断中的作用尚不清楚。通过高分辨率离体心脏磁共振成像(HR-LGE-CMR)验证,评估多尺寸电极定位识别NTS的效果。9头患有早期再灌注心肌梗死的猪使用QDOT导管进行心内膜电解剖电压测绘(EAVM),该导管在3.5mm尖端电极上包含三个ME。获得hr - large - cmr (0.3mm切片)并与EAVM合并。在每个EAVM点在CMR上投射一个半径为5mm的跨壁圆柱体,并定量圆柱体内活心肌(VM)的体积(Otsu法)。常规电极(c)和微电极(µ)的单极(UV)和双极(BV)电压与VM相关。正常心肌的临界值基于无纤维化区域的第5个百分位数。在每头猪中收集220个(IQR 216-260)测图点(总计2322个点)。正常心肌UVc、BVc、UVµ和BVµ的临界值分别为3.18 mV、0.85 mV、3.28mV和1.93 mV。与无纤维化区相比,纤维化区壁厚(WT)减少(5.4mm, IQR 3.2- 6.9 vs. 7.4mm, IQR 5.3 - 9.6)。纤维化部位与无纤维化部位的所有电压均降低(uv 4.4mV vs 6.8mV;BVc 1.2mV vs. 2.1mV;UVµ2.5mV vs. 5.5mV, BVµ2.9mV vs. 5.4mV,所有p200mm3到> 600mm3(相当于h=7.64mm的圆柱体)(图2),其中UVµ的相关性最强(r=0.47)。低于200mm3体积的VM电压与VM没有显著相关。在NTS中,UVc、BVc,尤其是BVµ和UVµ随着WT的增加和VM的跨壁体积的增加而增加,其中UVµ在估计跨壁VM方面的作用最大。EAVM不能准确地描绘出具有最低VM量的区域,这可能是由于NTS中的远场抵消不足。这两项发现都反驳了视场视距有限的观点。
Assessing the field of view of multisize electrodes in ischemic cardiomyopathy by validating against ex-vivo high resolution cardiac magnetic resonance
Type of funding sources: Public hospital(s). Main funding source(s): Leiden University Medical Centre
Substrate identification after myocardial infarction (MI) relies on voltage mapping. Early reperfusion results in non-transmural scar (NTS). Narrow-spaced microelectrodes (ME) are thought to have a limited field of view (FOV). The role of ME for delineation of NTS is unclear.
To evaluate mapping with multi-size electrodes for identifying NTS, validated against high-resolution ex-vivo cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (HR-LGE-CMR).
Nine swine with early reperfusion MI underwent endocardial electroanatomical voltage mapping (EAVM) with the QDOT catheter which incorporates three ME in the 3.5mm tip electrode. HR-LGE-CMR (0.3mm slices) were obtained and merged with EAVM. At each EAVM point a transmural cylinder (5mm radius) was projected on the CMR and the volume of viable myocardium (VM) in the cylinder quantified (Otsu method). Unipolar (UV) and bipolar (BV) voltages from conventional (c) and microelectrodes (µ) were related to VM. Cut-off values for normal myocardium were based on 5th percentiles of areas without fibrosis.
In each swine 220 (IQR 216-260) mapping points were collected (total 2322 points). Cut-off for normal myocardium were 3.18 mV, 0.85 mV, 3.28mV and 1.93 mV for UVc, BVc, UVµ and BVµ, respectively. Wall thickness (WT) was reduced in areas with fibrosis vs. no fibrosis (5.4mm, IQR 3.2- 6.9 vs. 7.4mm, IQR 5.3 - 9.6). All voltages were reduced at sites with fibrosis vs. no fibrosis (UVs 4.4mV vs. 6.8mV; BVc 1.2mV vs. 2.1mV; UVµ 2.5mV vs. 5.5mV, and BVµ 2.9mV vs. 5.4mV, all p<0.001).
For areas with any fibrosis, all voltages increased with increasing WT up to the maximal WT of 13mm (fig. 1). Similarly, all voltages increased with an increase in VM volumes from >200mm3 to >600 mm3 (equivalent to a cylinder with h=7.64mm) (fig. 2) with the strongest correlation for UVµ (r=0.47). Below a volume of 200mm3 VM voltages did not correlate significantly with VM.
In NTS, UVc, BVc, and, notably, BVµ and UVµ increase with increasing WT and increasing transmural volume of VM, with the biggest role perhaps laid out for UVµ to estimate transmural VM. EAVM cannot accurately delineate areas with the lowest amount of VM, potentially due to insufficient far field cancellation in NTS. Both these findings argue against a limited FOV of ME.