电子作业集成学习(eWIL)设计原则

IF 6.4 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Internet and Higher Education Pub Date : 2020-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100760
Charmaine Glavas, Lisa Schuster
{"title":"电子作业集成学习(eWIL)设计原则","authors":"Charmaine Glavas,&nbsp;Lisa Schuster","doi":"10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100760","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Technology extends the accessibility of work integrated learning (WIL) experiences in higher education – a key strategic priority for many universities. Despite growth in the implementation of electronic WIL (eWIL) initiatives, to date no studies provide design principles to guide development of these initiatives as called for by the literature. To address this gap, this research uses a co-design approach with sixteen interviews with undergraduate and postgraduate students who had participated in eWIL. Four design principles for eWIL are proposed, including (1) authenticity, (2) integration of technology, (3) effective support processes, and (4) fostering of co-presence and relationship building. The study found student and expert academic insights from extant literature on design principles generally aligned, however, the importance of fostering co-presence and relationship building emerged from the interview data along with an expanded understanding of authenticity within the eWIL context.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48186,"journal":{"name":"Internet and Higher Education","volume":"47 ","pages":"Article 100760"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100760","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Design principles for electronic work integrated learning (eWIL)\",\"authors\":\"Charmaine Glavas,&nbsp;Lisa Schuster\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100760\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Technology extends the accessibility of work integrated learning (WIL) experiences in higher education – a key strategic priority for many universities. Despite growth in the implementation of electronic WIL (eWIL) initiatives, to date no studies provide design principles to guide development of these initiatives as called for by the literature. To address this gap, this research uses a co-design approach with sixteen interviews with undergraduate and postgraduate students who had participated in eWIL. Four design principles for eWIL are proposed, including (1) authenticity, (2) integration of technology, (3) effective support processes, and (4) fostering of co-presence and relationship building. The study found student and expert academic insights from extant literature on design principles generally aligned, however, the importance of fostering co-presence and relationship building emerged from the interview data along with an expanded understanding of authenticity within the eWIL context.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Internet and Higher Education\",\"volume\":\"47 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100760\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100760\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Internet and Higher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1096751620300361\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internet and Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1096751620300361","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

技术扩大了高等教育中工作结合学习(WIL)体验的可及性,这是许多大学的关键战略重点。尽管电子WIL (eWIL)计划的实施有所增长,但迄今为止还没有研究提供文献所要求的设计原则来指导这些计划的发展。为了解决这一差距,本研究采用了协同设计方法,对参与eWIL的本科生和研究生进行了16次访谈。提出了eWIL的四个设计原则,包括:(1)真实性,(2)技术集成,(3)有效的支持流程,(4)促进共同存在和关系建立。研究发现,学生和专家从现有文献中对设计原则的学术见解大致一致,然而,从访谈数据中可以看出,培养共同存在和建立关系的重要性,以及对eWIL背景下真实性的扩展理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Design principles for electronic work integrated learning (eWIL)

Technology extends the accessibility of work integrated learning (WIL) experiences in higher education – a key strategic priority for many universities. Despite growth in the implementation of electronic WIL (eWIL) initiatives, to date no studies provide design principles to guide development of these initiatives as called for by the literature. To address this gap, this research uses a co-design approach with sixteen interviews with undergraduate and postgraduate students who had participated in eWIL. Four design principles for eWIL are proposed, including (1) authenticity, (2) integration of technology, (3) effective support processes, and (4) fostering of co-presence and relationship building. The study found student and expert academic insights from extant literature on design principles generally aligned, however, the importance of fostering co-presence and relationship building emerged from the interview data along with an expanded understanding of authenticity within the eWIL context.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Internet and Higher Education
Internet and Higher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
19.30
自引率
4.70%
发文量
30
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: The Internet and Higher Education is a quarterly peer-reviewed journal focused on contemporary issues and future trends in online learning, teaching, and administration within post-secondary education. It welcomes contributions from diverse academic disciplines worldwide and provides a platform for theory papers, research studies, critical essays, editorials, reviews, case studies, and social commentary.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board The paradox of self-efficacy and technological dependence: Unraveling generative AI's impact on university students' task completion Prior online learning experiences as incidental professional development: A cross-sectional survey of online instructor beliefs and strategies Interaction and dialogue: Integration and application of artificial intelligence in blended mode writing feedback A situated expectancy-value theoretical perspective of teaching presence and student engagement in blended learning environments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1