{"title":"分散液液微萃取与中空纤维液相微萃取耦合萃取农业有机污染物的研究","authors":"Thabiso Letseka, Mosotho J. George","doi":"10.1016/j.ancr.2016.11.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Liquid-based miniaturized techniques have received a lot of attention recently resulting in the development of the liquid phase microextraction (LPME) and dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) techniques each offering unique benefits over the other technique. Herein we report a combination of the two techniques for the extraction of hexestrol and atrazine from aqueous systems. The method sets off with the DLLME thereafter a hollow fibre filled with the organic solvent is introduced for the extraction of the pre-extracted analytes in the dispersed organic solvent. The method was modified further by introducing a second extracting solvent in place of the disperser solvent. Under the optimum conditions, namely, toluene in the acceptor phase, 1:1 chloroform:toluene (v/v) as a dispersed solvent, 15% NaCl, with the 15 min extraction time, the method achieved satisfactory enrichment factors (87- and 62-fold); sufficiently low detection limits of 0.018 μg/mL and 0.016 μg/mL using the flame ionization detector, while 0.072 and 0.063 ng/mL were obtained using single ion monitoring mass spectrometry detector, for atrazine and hexestrol, respectively; with sufficient linearity (R<sup>2</sup> ≥ 0.9959). Although the compounds were not detected in the river water sample, satisfactory recoveries (111–115%) were achieved indicating the method did not suffer any negative matrix effect.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7819,"journal":{"name":"Analytical Chemistry Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ancr.2016.11.001","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards coupling dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction with hollow fibre liquid phase microextraction for extraction of organic pollutants of agricultural origin\",\"authors\":\"Thabiso Letseka, Mosotho J. George\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ancr.2016.11.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Liquid-based miniaturized techniques have received a lot of attention recently resulting in the development of the liquid phase microextraction (LPME) and dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) techniques each offering unique benefits over the other technique. Herein we report a combination of the two techniques for the extraction of hexestrol and atrazine from aqueous systems. The method sets off with the DLLME thereafter a hollow fibre filled with the organic solvent is introduced for the extraction of the pre-extracted analytes in the dispersed organic solvent. The method was modified further by introducing a second extracting solvent in place of the disperser solvent. Under the optimum conditions, namely, toluene in the acceptor phase, 1:1 chloroform:toluene (v/v) as a dispersed solvent, 15% NaCl, with the 15 min extraction time, the method achieved satisfactory enrichment factors (87- and 62-fold); sufficiently low detection limits of 0.018 μg/mL and 0.016 μg/mL using the flame ionization detector, while 0.072 and 0.063 ng/mL were obtained using single ion monitoring mass spectrometry detector, for atrazine and hexestrol, respectively; with sufficient linearity (R<sup>2</sup> ≥ 0.9959). Although the compounds were not detected in the river water sample, satisfactory recoveries (111–115%) were achieved indicating the method did not suffer any negative matrix effect.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7819,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Analytical Chemistry Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ancr.2016.11.001\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Analytical Chemistry Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214181216300441\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical Chemistry Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214181216300441","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Towards coupling dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction with hollow fibre liquid phase microextraction for extraction of organic pollutants of agricultural origin
Liquid-based miniaturized techniques have received a lot of attention recently resulting in the development of the liquid phase microextraction (LPME) and dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) techniques each offering unique benefits over the other technique. Herein we report a combination of the two techniques for the extraction of hexestrol and atrazine from aqueous systems. The method sets off with the DLLME thereafter a hollow fibre filled with the organic solvent is introduced for the extraction of the pre-extracted analytes in the dispersed organic solvent. The method was modified further by introducing a second extracting solvent in place of the disperser solvent. Under the optimum conditions, namely, toluene in the acceptor phase, 1:1 chloroform:toluene (v/v) as a dispersed solvent, 15% NaCl, with the 15 min extraction time, the method achieved satisfactory enrichment factors (87- and 62-fold); sufficiently low detection limits of 0.018 μg/mL and 0.016 μg/mL using the flame ionization detector, while 0.072 and 0.063 ng/mL were obtained using single ion monitoring mass spectrometry detector, for atrazine and hexestrol, respectively; with sufficient linearity (R2 ≥ 0.9959). Although the compounds were not detected in the river water sample, satisfactory recoveries (111–115%) were achieved indicating the method did not suffer any negative matrix effect.