肯尼亚西部森林生计选择及其决定因素

IF 1.8 Q2 FORESTRY Forest Science and Technology Pub Date : 2021-01-02 DOI:10.1080/21580103.2020.1870577
Purity Yego, R. Mbeche, J. Ateka, E. Majiwa
{"title":"肯尼亚西部森林生计选择及其决定因素","authors":"Purity Yego, R. Mbeche, J. Ateka, E. Majiwa","doi":"10.1080/21580103.2020.1870577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Forest extraction is an important livelihood activity for millions of low-income households in rural areas of developing countries. Understanding the choices households make to extract forest products can help formulate strategies for preventing livelihood strains associated with forest degradation. This article evaluates the nature, extent and determinants of forest extraction among rural households in western Kenya. Data were obtained from a survey of 924 randomly selected households in the Mt. Elgon area in western Kenya. The level of forest extraction was measured as the aggregate value of products extracted, while a Double Hurdle model was applied to assess the factors influencing forest extraction. The results show that the choice to engage in forest-based livelihood was generally higher among households with lower asset value, membership in forest user associations, and headed by males. The results further show that although the majority of households’ engaging in forest-based livelihood were of the lowest wealth category, households in the middle wealth category were found to extract higher value products. Institutional characteristics, including access to agricultural markets, credit, extension, and membership to forest user groups, increased the likelihood of households’ extracting higher value products. Overall, the results show that in addition to asset endowment, other contextual factors, such as access to markets, agricultural extension, and membership to farmer groups defined whether a household extracted forest products for survival or accumulation.","PeriodicalId":51802,"journal":{"name":"Forest Science and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Forest-based livelihood choices and their determinants in Western Kenya\",\"authors\":\"Purity Yego, R. Mbeche, J. Ateka, E. Majiwa\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21580103.2020.1870577\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Forest extraction is an important livelihood activity for millions of low-income households in rural areas of developing countries. Understanding the choices households make to extract forest products can help formulate strategies for preventing livelihood strains associated with forest degradation. This article evaluates the nature, extent and determinants of forest extraction among rural households in western Kenya. Data were obtained from a survey of 924 randomly selected households in the Mt. Elgon area in western Kenya. The level of forest extraction was measured as the aggregate value of products extracted, while a Double Hurdle model was applied to assess the factors influencing forest extraction. The results show that the choice to engage in forest-based livelihood was generally higher among households with lower asset value, membership in forest user associations, and headed by males. The results further show that although the majority of households’ engaging in forest-based livelihood were of the lowest wealth category, households in the middle wealth category were found to extract higher value products. Institutional characteristics, including access to agricultural markets, credit, extension, and membership to forest user groups, increased the likelihood of households’ extracting higher value products. Overall, the results show that in addition to asset endowment, other contextual factors, such as access to markets, agricultural extension, and membership to farmer groups defined whether a household extracted forest products for survival or accumulation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51802,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forest Science and Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forest Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1087\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21580103.2020.1870577\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21580103.2020.1870577","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

森林采伐是发展中国家农村地区数百万低收入家庭的重要生计活动。了解家庭在提取林产品方面的选择有助于制定战略,防止与森林退化有关的生计压力。本文评估了肯尼亚西部农村家庭森林采伐的性质、程度和决定因素。数据来自对肯尼亚西部埃尔贡山地区随机抽取的924户家庭的调查。森林采伐水平以采伐产品的总和来衡量,并采用双障碍模型对森林采伐的影响因素进行评估。结果表明,资产价值较低、森林使用者协会会员、户主为男性的家庭,从事森林生计的选择普遍较高。研究结果进一步表明,虽然从事森林生计的大多数家庭属于最低财富类别,但中等财富类别的家庭提取的产品价值更高。制度特征,包括进入农业市场、信贷、推广和森林用户群体的成员资格,增加了家庭提取高价值产品的可能性。总体而言,研究结果表明,除了资产禀赋之外,市场准入、农业推广和农民团体成员资格等其他背景因素也决定了一个家庭是为了生存还是为了积累而采伐林产品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Forest-based livelihood choices and their determinants in Western Kenya
Abstract Forest extraction is an important livelihood activity for millions of low-income households in rural areas of developing countries. Understanding the choices households make to extract forest products can help formulate strategies for preventing livelihood strains associated with forest degradation. This article evaluates the nature, extent and determinants of forest extraction among rural households in western Kenya. Data were obtained from a survey of 924 randomly selected households in the Mt. Elgon area in western Kenya. The level of forest extraction was measured as the aggregate value of products extracted, while a Double Hurdle model was applied to assess the factors influencing forest extraction. The results show that the choice to engage in forest-based livelihood was generally higher among households with lower asset value, membership in forest user associations, and headed by males. The results further show that although the majority of households’ engaging in forest-based livelihood were of the lowest wealth category, households in the middle wealth category were found to extract higher value products. Institutional characteristics, including access to agricultural markets, credit, extension, and membership to forest user groups, increased the likelihood of households’ extracting higher value products. Overall, the results show that in addition to asset endowment, other contextual factors, such as access to markets, agricultural extension, and membership to farmer groups defined whether a household extracted forest products for survival or accumulation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊最新文献
Long-term assessment of historical disturbances in the dry land ecosystems of Mutis Timau Nature Reserve, East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia Unraveling the influence of afforestation with Liriodendron tulipifera on soil microbial diversity in Korea Effect of arbuscular mycorrhizae on the growth of Cinchona officinalis L. (rubiaceae) in nursery Effects of walking exercise on cognitive and physical functions: ­meta-analysis of older adults Forest cover change and its carbon dynamic of the karst area in Bulusaraung, South Sulawesi, Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1