{"title":"基于多通道流下限的最优逼近Max-Cut","authors":"Lijie Chen, Gillat Kol, Dmitry Paramonov, Raghuvansh R. Saxena, Zhao Song, Huacheng Yu","doi":"10.1137/1.9781611977554.ch35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We consider the Max-Cut problem, asking how much space is needed by a streaming algorithm in order to estimate the value of the maximum cut in a graph. This problem has been extensively studied over the last decade, and we now have a near-optimal lower bound for one-pass streaming algorithms, showing that they require linear space to guarantee a better-than-2 approximation [KKS15, KK19]. This result relies on a lower bound for the cycle-finding problem, showing that it is hard for a one-pass streaming algorithm to find a cycle in a union of matchings. The end-goal of our research is to prove a similar lower bound for multi-pass streaming algorithms that guarantee a better-than-2 approximation for Max-Cut, a highly challenging open problem. In this paper, we take a significant step in this direction, showing that even o(log n)-pass streaming algorithms need nΩ(1) space to solve the cycle-finding problem. Our proof is quite involved, dividing the cycles in the graph into “short” and “long” cycles, and using tailor-made lower bound techniques to handle each case. ∗UC Berkeley. †Princeton University. ‡Princeton University. §Microsoft Research. ¶Adobe Research. ‖Princeton University. ISSN 1433-8092 Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity, Report No. 161 (2022)","PeriodicalId":11639,"journal":{"name":"Electron. Colloquium Comput. Complex.","volume":"276 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards Multi-Pass Streaming Lower Bounds for Optimal Approximation of Max-Cut\",\"authors\":\"Lijie Chen, Gillat Kol, Dmitry Paramonov, Raghuvansh R. Saxena, Zhao Song, Huacheng Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.1137/1.9781611977554.ch35\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We consider the Max-Cut problem, asking how much space is needed by a streaming algorithm in order to estimate the value of the maximum cut in a graph. This problem has been extensively studied over the last decade, and we now have a near-optimal lower bound for one-pass streaming algorithms, showing that they require linear space to guarantee a better-than-2 approximation [KKS15, KK19]. This result relies on a lower bound for the cycle-finding problem, showing that it is hard for a one-pass streaming algorithm to find a cycle in a union of matchings. The end-goal of our research is to prove a similar lower bound for multi-pass streaming algorithms that guarantee a better-than-2 approximation for Max-Cut, a highly challenging open problem. In this paper, we take a significant step in this direction, showing that even o(log n)-pass streaming algorithms need nΩ(1) space to solve the cycle-finding problem. Our proof is quite involved, dividing the cycles in the graph into “short” and “long” cycles, and using tailor-made lower bound techniques to handle each case. ∗UC Berkeley. †Princeton University. ‡Princeton University. §Microsoft Research. ¶Adobe Research. ‖Princeton University. ISSN 1433-8092 Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity, Report No. 161 (2022)\",\"PeriodicalId\":11639,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Electron. Colloquium Comput. Complex.\",\"volume\":\"276 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Electron. Colloquium Comput. Complex.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611977554.ch35\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electron. Colloquium Comput. Complex.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611977554.ch35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Towards Multi-Pass Streaming Lower Bounds for Optimal Approximation of Max-Cut
We consider the Max-Cut problem, asking how much space is needed by a streaming algorithm in order to estimate the value of the maximum cut in a graph. This problem has been extensively studied over the last decade, and we now have a near-optimal lower bound for one-pass streaming algorithms, showing that they require linear space to guarantee a better-than-2 approximation [KKS15, KK19]. This result relies on a lower bound for the cycle-finding problem, showing that it is hard for a one-pass streaming algorithm to find a cycle in a union of matchings. The end-goal of our research is to prove a similar lower bound for multi-pass streaming algorithms that guarantee a better-than-2 approximation for Max-Cut, a highly challenging open problem. In this paper, we take a significant step in this direction, showing that even o(log n)-pass streaming algorithms need nΩ(1) space to solve the cycle-finding problem. Our proof is quite involved, dividing the cycles in the graph into “short” and “long” cycles, and using tailor-made lower bound techniques to handle each case. ∗UC Berkeley. †Princeton University. ‡Princeton University. §Microsoft Research. ¶Adobe Research. ‖Princeton University. ISSN 1433-8092 Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity, Report No. 161 (2022)