{"title":"贝米帕林与依诺肝素在COVID-19静脉血栓栓塞高危患者中的扩展血栓预防作用","authors":"A. Topçu, Nurdan Papila-Topal, A. Batırel","doi":"10.4274/mjima.galenos.2021.2021.65","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Patients with COVID-19 are at increased risk of thromboembolic events during hospitalization and after discharge. Current guidelines recommend use of extended thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized COVID-19 patients who have high risk of post-discharge venous thromboembolism and low risk of bleeding. We aimed to report our experience regarding different low-molecular-weight heparins administered post-discharge in a COVID-19 patient population with high-thromboembolic and low-bleeding risk. Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective, observational study. Consecutive patients admitted with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 between March 16 and July 16, 2020, were assessed for enrollment. Patients were included if they received prophylaxis with low-molecular weight heparins after discharge, were 18 years of age, patients with intensive care unit admission, and patients who experienced venous and/or arterial thromboembolism prior to discharge were excluded. Extended thromboprophylaxis with either enoxaparin 4000 IU once daily or bemiparin 3500 IU once daily was prescribed if a patient had a modified IMPROVE VTE score of >= 4, or a modified IMPROVE score of >= 2 and a D-dimer level of >= 2 times the reference range. Patients were followed-up for 30 days after discharge. Primary endpoint was occurrence of radiologically confirmed symptomatic venous thromboembolism (deep vein thrombosis and/ or pulmonary embolism). Results: A total of 3498 consecutive patients were hospitalized with a diagnosis of COVID-19. Of them, 38 (20 women) received extended thromboprophylaxis. Mean of age was 66.6 +/- 15.7 years. Twenty-five patients received enoxaparin, and 13 received bemiparin. Three patients in the enoxaparin group and none of the patients in the bemiparin group experienced post-discharge venous thromboembolism (p=0.681). Major bleeding occurred in one patient in the enoxaparin group, and in zero patients in the bemiparin group (p=0.456). Conclusion: Enoxaparin and bemiparin have similar prophylactic properties when used for prevention of post-discharge venous thromboembolism in COVID-19 survivors who have high thromboembolic and low bleeding risk.","PeriodicalId":53879,"journal":{"name":"Mediterranean Journal of Infection Microbes and Antimicrobials","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bemiparin Versus Enoxaparin for Extended Thromboprophylaxis in COVID-19 Patients at High Risk of Venous Thromboembolism\",\"authors\":\"A. Topçu, Nurdan Papila-Topal, A. Batırel\",\"doi\":\"10.4274/mjima.galenos.2021.2021.65\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Patients with COVID-19 are at increased risk of thromboembolic events during hospitalization and after discharge. Current guidelines recommend use of extended thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized COVID-19 patients who have high risk of post-discharge venous thromboembolism and low risk of bleeding. We aimed to report our experience regarding different low-molecular-weight heparins administered post-discharge in a COVID-19 patient population with high-thromboembolic and low-bleeding risk. Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective, observational study. Consecutive patients admitted with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 between March 16 and July 16, 2020, were assessed for enrollment. Patients were included if they received prophylaxis with low-molecular weight heparins after discharge, were 18 years of age, patients with intensive care unit admission, and patients who experienced venous and/or arterial thromboembolism prior to discharge were excluded. Extended thromboprophylaxis with either enoxaparin 4000 IU once daily or bemiparin 3500 IU once daily was prescribed if a patient had a modified IMPROVE VTE score of >= 4, or a modified IMPROVE score of >= 2 and a D-dimer level of >= 2 times the reference range. Patients were followed-up for 30 days after discharge. Primary endpoint was occurrence of radiologically confirmed symptomatic venous thromboembolism (deep vein thrombosis and/ or pulmonary embolism). Results: A total of 3498 consecutive patients were hospitalized with a diagnosis of COVID-19. Of them, 38 (20 women) received extended thromboprophylaxis. Mean of age was 66.6 +/- 15.7 years. Twenty-five patients received enoxaparin, and 13 received bemiparin. Three patients in the enoxaparin group and none of the patients in the bemiparin group experienced post-discharge venous thromboembolism (p=0.681). Major bleeding occurred in one patient in the enoxaparin group, and in zero patients in the bemiparin group (p=0.456). Conclusion: Enoxaparin and bemiparin have similar prophylactic properties when used for prevention of post-discharge venous thromboembolism in COVID-19 survivors who have high thromboembolic and low bleeding risk.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53879,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mediterranean Journal of Infection Microbes and Antimicrobials\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mediterranean Journal of Infection Microbes and Antimicrobials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4274/mjima.galenos.2021.2021.65\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mediterranean Journal of Infection Microbes and Antimicrobials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/mjima.galenos.2021.2021.65","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Bemiparin Versus Enoxaparin for Extended Thromboprophylaxis in COVID-19 Patients at High Risk of Venous Thromboembolism
Introduction: Patients with COVID-19 are at increased risk of thromboembolic events during hospitalization and after discharge. Current guidelines recommend use of extended thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized COVID-19 patients who have high risk of post-discharge venous thromboembolism and low risk of bleeding. We aimed to report our experience regarding different low-molecular-weight heparins administered post-discharge in a COVID-19 patient population with high-thromboembolic and low-bleeding risk. Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective, observational study. Consecutive patients admitted with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 between March 16 and July 16, 2020, were assessed for enrollment. Patients were included if they received prophylaxis with low-molecular weight heparins after discharge, were 18 years of age, patients with intensive care unit admission, and patients who experienced venous and/or arterial thromboembolism prior to discharge were excluded. Extended thromboprophylaxis with either enoxaparin 4000 IU once daily or bemiparin 3500 IU once daily was prescribed if a patient had a modified IMPROVE VTE score of >= 4, or a modified IMPROVE score of >= 2 and a D-dimer level of >= 2 times the reference range. Patients were followed-up for 30 days after discharge. Primary endpoint was occurrence of radiologically confirmed symptomatic venous thromboembolism (deep vein thrombosis and/ or pulmonary embolism). Results: A total of 3498 consecutive patients were hospitalized with a diagnosis of COVID-19. Of them, 38 (20 women) received extended thromboprophylaxis. Mean of age was 66.6 +/- 15.7 years. Twenty-five patients received enoxaparin, and 13 received bemiparin. Three patients in the enoxaparin group and none of the patients in the bemiparin group experienced post-discharge venous thromboembolism (p=0.681). Major bleeding occurred in one patient in the enoxaparin group, and in zero patients in the bemiparin group (p=0.456). Conclusion: Enoxaparin and bemiparin have similar prophylactic properties when used for prevention of post-discharge venous thromboembolism in COVID-19 survivors who have high thromboembolic and low bleeding risk.