贝米帕林与依诺肝素在COVID-19静脉血栓栓塞高危患者中的扩展血栓预防作用

A. Topçu, Nurdan Papila-Topal, A. Batırel
{"title":"贝米帕林与依诺肝素在COVID-19静脉血栓栓塞高危患者中的扩展血栓预防作用","authors":"A. Topçu, Nurdan Papila-Topal, A. Batırel","doi":"10.4274/mjima.galenos.2021.2021.65","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Patients with COVID-19 are at increased risk of thromboembolic events during hospitalization and after discharge. Current guidelines recommend use of extended thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized COVID-19 patients who have high risk of post-discharge venous thromboembolism and low risk of bleeding. We aimed to report our experience regarding different low-molecular-weight heparins administered post-discharge in a COVID-19 patient population with high-thromboembolic and low-bleeding risk. Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective, observational study. Consecutive patients admitted with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 between March 16 and July 16, 2020, were assessed for enrollment. Patients were included if they received prophylaxis with low-molecular weight heparins after discharge, were 18 years of age, patients with intensive care unit admission, and patients who experienced venous and/or arterial thromboembolism prior to discharge were excluded. Extended thromboprophylaxis with either enoxaparin 4000 IU once daily or bemiparin 3500 IU once daily was prescribed if a patient had a modified IMPROVE VTE score of >= 4, or a modified IMPROVE score of >= 2 and a D-dimer level of >= 2 times the reference range. Patients were followed-up for 30 days after discharge. Primary endpoint was occurrence of radiologically confirmed symptomatic venous thromboembolism (deep vein thrombosis and/ or pulmonary embolism). Results: A total of 3498 consecutive patients were hospitalized with a diagnosis of COVID-19. Of them, 38 (20 women) received extended thromboprophylaxis. Mean of age was 66.6 +/- 15.7 years. Twenty-five patients received enoxaparin, and 13 received bemiparin. Three patients in the enoxaparin group and none of the patients in the bemiparin group experienced post-discharge venous thromboembolism (p=0.681). Major bleeding occurred in one patient in the enoxaparin group, and in zero patients in the bemiparin group (p=0.456). Conclusion: Enoxaparin and bemiparin have similar prophylactic properties when used for prevention of post-discharge venous thromboembolism in COVID-19 survivors who have high thromboembolic and low bleeding risk.","PeriodicalId":53879,"journal":{"name":"Mediterranean Journal of Infection Microbes and Antimicrobials","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bemiparin Versus Enoxaparin for Extended Thromboprophylaxis in COVID-19 Patients at High Risk of Venous Thromboembolism\",\"authors\":\"A. Topçu, Nurdan Papila-Topal, A. Batırel\",\"doi\":\"10.4274/mjima.galenos.2021.2021.65\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Patients with COVID-19 are at increased risk of thromboembolic events during hospitalization and after discharge. Current guidelines recommend use of extended thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized COVID-19 patients who have high risk of post-discharge venous thromboembolism and low risk of bleeding. We aimed to report our experience regarding different low-molecular-weight heparins administered post-discharge in a COVID-19 patient population with high-thromboembolic and low-bleeding risk. Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective, observational study. Consecutive patients admitted with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 between March 16 and July 16, 2020, were assessed for enrollment. Patients were included if they received prophylaxis with low-molecular weight heparins after discharge, were 18 years of age, patients with intensive care unit admission, and patients who experienced venous and/or arterial thromboembolism prior to discharge were excluded. Extended thromboprophylaxis with either enoxaparin 4000 IU once daily or bemiparin 3500 IU once daily was prescribed if a patient had a modified IMPROVE VTE score of >= 4, or a modified IMPROVE score of >= 2 and a D-dimer level of >= 2 times the reference range. Patients were followed-up for 30 days after discharge. Primary endpoint was occurrence of radiologically confirmed symptomatic venous thromboembolism (deep vein thrombosis and/ or pulmonary embolism). Results: A total of 3498 consecutive patients were hospitalized with a diagnosis of COVID-19. Of them, 38 (20 women) received extended thromboprophylaxis. Mean of age was 66.6 +/- 15.7 years. Twenty-five patients received enoxaparin, and 13 received bemiparin. Three patients in the enoxaparin group and none of the patients in the bemiparin group experienced post-discharge venous thromboembolism (p=0.681). Major bleeding occurred in one patient in the enoxaparin group, and in zero patients in the bemiparin group (p=0.456). Conclusion: Enoxaparin and bemiparin have similar prophylactic properties when used for prevention of post-discharge venous thromboembolism in COVID-19 survivors who have high thromboembolic and low bleeding risk.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53879,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mediterranean Journal of Infection Microbes and Antimicrobials\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mediterranean Journal of Infection Microbes and Antimicrobials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4274/mjima.galenos.2021.2021.65\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mediterranean Journal of Infection Microbes and Antimicrobials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/mjima.galenos.2021.2021.65","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导论:COVID-19患者在住院期间和出院后发生血栓栓塞事件的风险增加。目前的指南建议在出院后静脉血栓栓塞风险高、出血风险低的COVID-19住院患者中使用延长的血栓预防。我们的目的是报告我们对具有高血栓栓塞和低出血风险的COVID-19患者出院后给予不同低分子量肝素的经验。方法:本研究为单中心、回顾性、观察性研究。对2020年3月16日至7月16日期间确诊为COVID-19的连续患者进行入组评估。如果患者在出院后接受低分子肝素预防,18岁,重症监护病房入院的患者,出院前经历静脉和/或动脉血栓栓塞的患者被排除在外。如果患者改良改良改良VTE评分>= 4,或改良改良改良改良改良评分>= 2且d -二聚体水平>= 2倍参考范围,则给予每日一次依诺肝素4000 IU或每日一次3500 IU的血栓预防。出院后随访30 d。主要终点是放射学证实的症状性静脉血栓栓塞(深静脉血栓形成和/或肺栓塞)的发生。结果:共有3498例确诊为COVID-19的患者连续住院。其中,38人(20名女性)接受了延长的血栓预防治疗。平均年龄66.6±15.7岁。25例患者接受依诺肝素治疗,13例接受贝米帕林治疗。依诺肝素组3例患者出现出院后静脉血栓栓塞,贝米帕林组0例患者出现出院后静脉血栓栓塞(p=0.681)。依诺肝素组大出血1例,贝米帕林组大出血0例(p=0.456)。结论:依诺肝素和贝米帕林用于预防高血栓栓塞和低出血风险的COVID-19幸存者出院后静脉血栓栓塞具有相似的预防作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bemiparin Versus Enoxaparin for Extended Thromboprophylaxis in COVID-19 Patients at High Risk of Venous Thromboembolism
Introduction: Patients with COVID-19 are at increased risk of thromboembolic events during hospitalization and after discharge. Current guidelines recommend use of extended thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized COVID-19 patients who have high risk of post-discharge venous thromboembolism and low risk of bleeding. We aimed to report our experience regarding different low-molecular-weight heparins administered post-discharge in a COVID-19 patient population with high-thromboembolic and low-bleeding risk. Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective, observational study. Consecutive patients admitted with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 between March 16 and July 16, 2020, were assessed for enrollment. Patients were included if they received prophylaxis with low-molecular weight heparins after discharge, were 18 years of age, patients with intensive care unit admission, and patients who experienced venous and/or arterial thromboembolism prior to discharge were excluded. Extended thromboprophylaxis with either enoxaparin 4000 IU once daily or bemiparin 3500 IU once daily was prescribed if a patient had a modified IMPROVE VTE score of >= 4, or a modified IMPROVE score of >= 2 and a D-dimer level of >= 2 times the reference range. Patients were followed-up for 30 days after discharge. Primary endpoint was occurrence of radiologically confirmed symptomatic venous thromboembolism (deep vein thrombosis and/ or pulmonary embolism). Results: A total of 3498 consecutive patients were hospitalized with a diagnosis of COVID-19. Of them, 38 (20 women) received extended thromboprophylaxis. Mean of age was 66.6 +/- 15.7 years. Twenty-five patients received enoxaparin, and 13 received bemiparin. Three patients in the enoxaparin group and none of the patients in the bemiparin group experienced post-discharge venous thromboembolism (p=0.681). Major bleeding occurred in one patient in the enoxaparin group, and in zero patients in the bemiparin group (p=0.456). Conclusion: Enoxaparin and bemiparin have similar prophylactic properties when used for prevention of post-discharge venous thromboembolism in COVID-19 survivors who have high thromboembolic and low bleeding risk.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Changing Infection Dynamics with the Pandemic: Distribution of Viral Agents of Respiratory Tract Infections in the Last 5 Years The Outcomes of Direct-acting Antiviral Treatment in 177 Patients with Hepatitis C Virus: A single-center Experience Septik Artritin Nadir Nedeni: Salmonella Group B Streptococcus Carriage in Pregnancy: The Burden of Early-onset Neonatal Disease and Estimation of the Cost of Universal Antenatal Screening in a Hospital of the Eastern Region of Saudi Arabia Effect of Colchicine on Secondaryacute Lung Injury in an Experimental Rat Sepsis Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1