大流行消息传递是连接还是销售?LinkedIn上关于COVID-19的B2B消息策略

Steven L. Brewer, Rebecca Imes
{"title":"大流行消息传递是连接还是销售?LinkedIn上关于COVID-19的B2B消息策略","authors":"Steven L. Brewer, Rebecca Imes","doi":"10.1108/ccij-12-2022-0149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis study examines how the world's largest business-to-business (B2B) firms communicated about coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on LinkedIn during the first months of the pandemic. A Situational Crisis Communication Theory (SCCT) framework (Coombs, 2004) is used to assess how pandemic message themes resembled and differed from those utilized in past crises.Design/methodology/approachResearchers examined all LinkedIn posts made by the 20 largest global B2B firms during February–October 2020 and assigned the posts to five message themes.FindingsConsistent with past crises, firms conveyed “instructing” information designed to help social media followers cope. However, some businesses also promoted products for use in dealing with COVID-19. This stands in contrast to past reluctance to promote products during a crisis due to fears of being viewed as acting inappropriately. Surprisingly, only about 9% of all posts related to COVID-19.Research limitations/implicationsResearch focused on the LinkedIn posts of the 20 largest B2B firms, limiting generalizability for smaller firms and for other social networks.Practical implicationsThis study provides insights into how marketers can communicate to their stakeholders during a crisis.Social implicationsThis study examines how reaction to COVID-19 was similar and different from message themes found during previous crises.Originality/valueThis study is one of the first to examine how businesses use LinkedIn to communicate with key constituencies. This study examines whether SCCT predicted strategies used by global B2B firms during the pandemic and considers whether expectations regarding crises may be changing.","PeriodicalId":10696,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Communications: An International Journal","volume":"111 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pandemic messaging to connect or to sell? B2B messaging strategies on LinkedIn regarding COVID-19\",\"authors\":\"Steven L. Brewer, Rebecca Imes\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ccij-12-2022-0149\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeThis study examines how the world's largest business-to-business (B2B) firms communicated about coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on LinkedIn during the first months of the pandemic. A Situational Crisis Communication Theory (SCCT) framework (Coombs, 2004) is used to assess how pandemic message themes resembled and differed from those utilized in past crises.Design/methodology/approachResearchers examined all LinkedIn posts made by the 20 largest global B2B firms during February–October 2020 and assigned the posts to five message themes.FindingsConsistent with past crises, firms conveyed “instructing” information designed to help social media followers cope. However, some businesses also promoted products for use in dealing with COVID-19. This stands in contrast to past reluctance to promote products during a crisis due to fears of being viewed as acting inappropriately. Surprisingly, only about 9% of all posts related to COVID-19.Research limitations/implicationsResearch focused on the LinkedIn posts of the 20 largest B2B firms, limiting generalizability for smaller firms and for other social networks.Practical implicationsThis study provides insights into how marketers can communicate to their stakeholders during a crisis.Social implicationsThis study examines how reaction to COVID-19 was similar and different from message themes found during previous crises.Originality/valueThis study is one of the first to examine how businesses use LinkedIn to communicate with key constituencies. This study examines whether SCCT predicted strategies used by global B2B firms during the pandemic and considers whether expectations regarding crises may be changing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10696,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Corporate Communications: An International Journal\",\"volume\":\"111 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Corporate Communications: An International Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ccij-12-2022-0149\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Communications: An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ccij-12-2022-0149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究调查了全球最大的企业对企业(B2B)公司在大流行的头几个月里如何在领英上就2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)进行沟通。情境危机沟通理论(SCCT)框架(Coombs, 2004)用于评估流行病信息主题与过去危机中使用的信息主题的相似和不同之处。设计/方法/方法研究人员检查了2020年2月至10月期间20家最大的全球B2B公司在LinkedIn上发布的所有帖子,并将这些帖子划分为五个消息主题。与过去的危机一样,公司传达了旨在帮助社交媒体关注者应对危机的“指导性”信息。然而,一些企业也推出了应对COVID-19的产品。这与过去由于担心被视为行为不当而不愿在危机期间宣传产品的做法形成了鲜明对比。令人惊讶的是,在所有与COVID-19相关的帖子中,只有约9%。研究局限/启示研究集中在20家最大的B2B公司的LinkedIn帖子上,限制了小型公司和其他社交网络的普遍性。实际意义本研究为市场营销人员在危机期间如何与利益相关者沟通提供了见解。社会影响本研究考察了对COVID-19的反应与以往危机中发现的信息主题的相似和不同之处。原创性/价值这项研究是首批研究企业如何使用LinkedIn与关键用户进行沟通的研究之一。本研究考察了SCCT是否预测了全球B2B公司在大流行期间使用的策略,并考虑了对危机的预期是否可能发生变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pandemic messaging to connect or to sell? B2B messaging strategies on LinkedIn regarding COVID-19
PurposeThis study examines how the world's largest business-to-business (B2B) firms communicated about coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on LinkedIn during the first months of the pandemic. A Situational Crisis Communication Theory (SCCT) framework (Coombs, 2004) is used to assess how pandemic message themes resembled and differed from those utilized in past crises.Design/methodology/approachResearchers examined all LinkedIn posts made by the 20 largest global B2B firms during February–October 2020 and assigned the posts to five message themes.FindingsConsistent with past crises, firms conveyed “instructing” information designed to help social media followers cope. However, some businesses also promoted products for use in dealing with COVID-19. This stands in contrast to past reluctance to promote products during a crisis due to fears of being viewed as acting inappropriately. Surprisingly, only about 9% of all posts related to COVID-19.Research limitations/implicationsResearch focused on the LinkedIn posts of the 20 largest B2B firms, limiting generalizability for smaller firms and for other social networks.Practical implicationsThis study provides insights into how marketers can communicate to their stakeholders during a crisis.Social implicationsThis study examines how reaction to COVID-19 was similar and different from message themes found during previous crises.Originality/valueThis study is one of the first to examine how businesses use LinkedIn to communicate with key constituencies. This study examines whether SCCT predicted strategies used by global B2B firms during the pandemic and considers whether expectations regarding crises may be changing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Societal impact of Brand Public Relations on gender equality: evidence for a mediation-type mechanism Empowering public relations for sustainability: examining the landscape in Turkey Effectiveness of femvertising communications on social media: how brand promises and motive attributions impact brand equity and endorsement outcomes Silent ripples: negative CSR associations' impact in non-crisis situations Online faith-holder communities in crisis: proposing and testing a dual-challenge model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1