决定的途径:程序还是辩论?

IF 0.1 4区 历史学 Q3 HISTORY ZEITSCHRIFT FUR HISTORISCHE FORSCHUNG Pub Date : 2020-07-01 DOI:10.3790/zhf.47.3.371
Richard Lüdicke
{"title":"决定的途径:程序还是辩论?","authors":"Richard Lüdicke","doi":"10.3790/zhf.47.3.371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How to Come up for a Decision: Procedure or Negotiation? The Disputations in Cities in the 1520s\nThe disputations held in imperial cities of the Holy Roman Empire during the 1520 s, facing the turmoils caused by the reformation, served – like a stage play – to showcase and communicate the decision to implement Reformation that had already been made in advance. Usually, this is the judgement on the so called “Religionsgespräche”. Although this view shows up even in contemporary statements, the article argues, that a differentiated analysis of the various actors, their interests and possibilities to influence the events opens up a clearer perspective on what happened and why it happened. Using the sociological distinction of procedure and negotiation, this article shows, that the disputation had to keep the balance between reglemented procedure and more liberal negotiation to produce an accepted and also binding result for their community. Examples from the disputations of Zürich (1523), Kaufbeuren, Memmingen, Nürnberg (1525) and Bern (1528) allow this article to illustrate different ways of how this balancing on a razor’s edge could be done. The conclusion develops a general model of how the cities used disputations to try to deal with the religious turmoil while facing stiff opposition from local clerics and scholars, the papal church and the emperor.","PeriodicalId":54000,"journal":{"name":"ZEITSCHRIFT FUR HISTORISCHE FORSCHUNG","volume":"111 1","pages":"371-414"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Der Weg zur Entscheidung: Verfahren oder Verhandlung?\",\"authors\":\"Richard Lüdicke\",\"doi\":\"10.3790/zhf.47.3.371\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"How to Come up for a Decision: Procedure or Negotiation? The Disputations in Cities in the 1520s\\nThe disputations held in imperial cities of the Holy Roman Empire during the 1520 s, facing the turmoils caused by the reformation, served – like a stage play – to showcase and communicate the decision to implement Reformation that had already been made in advance. Usually, this is the judgement on the so called “Religionsgespräche”. Although this view shows up even in contemporary statements, the article argues, that a differentiated analysis of the various actors, their interests and possibilities to influence the events opens up a clearer perspective on what happened and why it happened. Using the sociological distinction of procedure and negotiation, this article shows, that the disputation had to keep the balance between reglemented procedure and more liberal negotiation to produce an accepted and also binding result for their community. Examples from the disputations of Zürich (1523), Kaufbeuren, Memmingen, Nürnberg (1525) and Bern (1528) allow this article to illustrate different ways of how this balancing on a razor’s edge could be done. The conclusion develops a general model of how the cities used disputations to try to deal with the religious turmoil while facing stiff opposition from local clerics and scholars, the papal church and the emperor.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ZEITSCHRIFT FUR HISTORISCHE FORSCHUNG\",\"volume\":\"111 1\",\"pages\":\"371-414\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ZEITSCHRIFT FUR HISTORISCHE FORSCHUNG\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3790/zhf.47.3.371\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ZEITSCHRIFT FUR HISTORISCHE FORSCHUNG","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3790/zhf.47.3.371","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

如何做出决定:程序还是谈判?1520年代的城市辩论1520年代,面对宗教改革带来的动荡,神圣罗马帝国的城市辩论就像一出舞台剧一样,展示和传达了已经做出的实施宗教改革的决定。通常,这是对所谓“Religionsgespräche”的判断。尽管这种观点甚至出现在当代的陈述中,但文章认为,对各种行动者、他们的利益和影响事件的可能性进行差异化分析,可以更清楚地了解发生了什么以及为什么会发生。本文运用对程序与协商的社会学区分,表明争端必须在规范的程序与更自由的协商之间保持平衡,才能为其社区产生一个可接受且具有约束力的结果。本文以z里奇(1523年)、Kaufbeuren、Memmingen、n rnberg(1525年)和Bern(1528年)的争论为例,阐述了如何在刀口上实现这种平衡的不同方法。结论部分建立了一个通用模型,说明城市如何在面临当地神职人员和学者、教皇会和皇帝的强烈反对时,利用争议来试图应对宗教动荡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Der Weg zur Entscheidung: Verfahren oder Verhandlung?
How to Come up for a Decision: Procedure or Negotiation? The Disputations in Cities in the 1520s The disputations held in imperial cities of the Holy Roman Empire during the 1520 s, facing the turmoils caused by the reformation, served – like a stage play – to showcase and communicate the decision to implement Reformation that had already been made in advance. Usually, this is the judgement on the so called “Religionsgespräche”. Although this view shows up even in contemporary statements, the article argues, that a differentiated analysis of the various actors, their interests and possibilities to influence the events opens up a clearer perspective on what happened and why it happened. Using the sociological distinction of procedure and negotiation, this article shows, that the disputation had to keep the balance between reglemented procedure and more liberal negotiation to produce an accepted and also binding result for their community. Examples from the disputations of Zürich (1523), Kaufbeuren, Memmingen, Nürnberg (1525) and Bern (1528) allow this article to illustrate different ways of how this balancing on a razor’s edge could be done. The conclusion develops a general model of how the cities used disputations to try to deal with the religious turmoil while facing stiff opposition from local clerics and scholars, the papal church and the emperor.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
期刊介绍: Das Arbeitsgebiet der ZHF umfaßt die europäische Geschichte etwa vom 13. bis 19. Jahrhundert. Neben der politischen Geschichte werden in besonderem Maße auch Rechtsgeschichte, Kulturgeschichte sowie Sozialgeschichte berücksichtigt. Neuerscheinungen zu den genannten Gebieten werden in einem umfangreichen Rezensionsteil besprochen.
期刊最新文献
Die Autonomiestädte der Frühen Neuzeit „Souveränitätskrise“ und dauerhafte Kontrolle des „Vorfeldes“? Die Hochphase des deutschen Versklavungshandels Nur mit Papier, Feder und Wachs „Darzu mancher Mann sich viel zu schwach unnd zu wenig Befinden wu‍[e]‌rde“
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1