来自预测分析工具的建议利用率:趋势是你的朋友

IF 2.5 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE European Accounting Review Pub Date : 2022-11-23 DOI:10.1080/09638180.2022.2138934
Dennis D. Fehrenbacher, A. Ghio, M. Weisner
{"title":"来自预测分析工具的建议利用率:趋势是你的朋友","authors":"Dennis D. Fehrenbacher, A. Ghio, M. Weisner","doi":"10.1080/09638180.2022.2138934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Management decision-making is increasingly supported by new data types and advanced predictive analytics tools. Prior research suggests that the inclusion of new data types – such as social media data – in forecasting models can improve forecasting. We explore whether managers’ operational decisions differ depending on the data type used by a predictive analytics tool and the consistency of the trend with prior developments. Experimental results show that the extent to which managers use predictions from analytics tools is a joint function of the data type utilized and trend consistency. If a trend predicted by an analytics tool reveals a downward break from prior positive developments (i.e., an unexpected negative trend), managers utilize predictions less if they are mainly based on social media data rather than on traditional accounting data. If a trend predicted by an analytics tool continues a prior positive trend, we do not find such a difference. In supplemental analyses, we explore managers’ comfort level and related attitude concerning the data types and find that only in the trend-breaking condition mediation effects are observed. Together, our findings have important implications for the management accounting function that needs to embed knowledge about managers’ information utilization to facilitate decision-making.","PeriodicalId":11764,"journal":{"name":"European Accounting Review","volume":"17 1","pages":"637 - 662"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advice Utilization From Predictive Analytics Tools: The Trend is Your Friend\",\"authors\":\"Dennis D. Fehrenbacher, A. Ghio, M. Weisner\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09638180.2022.2138934\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Management decision-making is increasingly supported by new data types and advanced predictive analytics tools. Prior research suggests that the inclusion of new data types – such as social media data – in forecasting models can improve forecasting. We explore whether managers’ operational decisions differ depending on the data type used by a predictive analytics tool and the consistency of the trend with prior developments. Experimental results show that the extent to which managers use predictions from analytics tools is a joint function of the data type utilized and trend consistency. If a trend predicted by an analytics tool reveals a downward break from prior positive developments (i.e., an unexpected negative trend), managers utilize predictions less if they are mainly based on social media data rather than on traditional accounting data. If a trend predicted by an analytics tool continues a prior positive trend, we do not find such a difference. In supplemental analyses, we explore managers’ comfort level and related attitude concerning the data types and find that only in the trend-breaking condition mediation effects are observed. Together, our findings have important implications for the management accounting function that needs to embed knowledge about managers’ information utilization to facilitate decision-making.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11764,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Accounting Review\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"637 - 662\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Accounting Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2022.2138934\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Accounting Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2022.2138934","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

管理决策越来越多地得到新的数据类型和先进的预测分析工具的支持。先前的研究表明,在预测模型中加入新的数据类型——比如社会媒体数据——可以改善预测。我们将探讨管理者的运营决策是否会因预测分析工具使用的数据类型以及趋势与先前发展的一致性而有所不同。实验结果表明,管理者使用分析工具预测的程度是所利用的数据类型和趋势一致性的联合函数。如果分析工具预测的趋势显示出先前积极发展的下行中断(即意想不到的负面趋势),如果主要基于社交媒体数据而不是传统会计数据,则管理者使用的预测较少。如果分析工具预测的趋势延续了先前的积极趋势,我们就找不到这样的差异。在补充分析中,我们探讨了管理者对数据类型的舒适度和相关态度,发现只有在趋势突破条件下才会观察到中介效应。总之,我们的研究结果对管理会计职能具有重要意义,因为管理会计职能需要嵌入有关管理者信息利用的知识,以促进决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Advice Utilization From Predictive Analytics Tools: The Trend is Your Friend
ABSTRACT Management decision-making is increasingly supported by new data types and advanced predictive analytics tools. Prior research suggests that the inclusion of new data types – such as social media data – in forecasting models can improve forecasting. We explore whether managers’ operational decisions differ depending on the data type used by a predictive analytics tool and the consistency of the trend with prior developments. Experimental results show that the extent to which managers use predictions from analytics tools is a joint function of the data type utilized and trend consistency. If a trend predicted by an analytics tool reveals a downward break from prior positive developments (i.e., an unexpected negative trend), managers utilize predictions less if they are mainly based on social media data rather than on traditional accounting data. If a trend predicted by an analytics tool continues a prior positive trend, we do not find such a difference. In supplemental analyses, we explore managers’ comfort level and related attitude concerning the data types and find that only in the trend-breaking condition mediation effects are observed. Together, our findings have important implications for the management accounting function that needs to embed knowledge about managers’ information utilization to facilitate decision-making.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Accounting Review
European Accounting Review BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
6.10%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: Devoted to the advancement of accounting knowledge, it provides a forum for the publication of high quality accounting research manuscripts. The journal acknowledges its European origins and the distinctive variety of the European accounting research community. Conscious of these origins, European Accounting Review emphasises openness and flexibility, not only regarding the substantive issues of accounting research, but also with respect to paradigms, methodologies and styles of conducting that research. Though European Accounting Review is a truly international journal, it also holds a unique position as it is the only accounting journal to provide a European forum for the reporting of accounting research.
期刊最新文献
Tax Employee Careers and Corporate Tax Outcomes* Relational Work and Accounting: What Venture Capital Analysts Do with Accounting and Other Information in Situations of Uncertainty Regional Social Capital and Non-GAAP Earnings Disclosure Moving beyond Beyond Budgeting: A Case Study of the Dynamic Interrelationships between Budgets and Forecasts Climate Disasters and Analysts’ Earnings Forecasts: Evidence from the United States
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1