两种人脸识别机器学习模型的比较

صفاء سالم محمد دخيلة, نور الدين على احمد, هالة الشاعري
{"title":"两种人脸识别机器学习模型的比较","authors":"صفاء سالم محمد دخيلة, نور الدين على احمد, هالة الشاعري","doi":"10.51984/jopas.v21i4.2120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Machine learning (ML) is one of the fastest-developing topics today, straddling the boundary between statistics and computer science, as well as data science. It is a type of artificial intelligence that allows software applications to become more accurate at predicting outcomes without being explicitly programmed. And It addresses the difficulty of the way to assemble gadgets that enhance themselves via experience, and make conclusions with minimum human assistance. For this purpose, there arises a need to use various statistical methods of face recognition’ models, such as (DeepFace) and (OpenFace). DeepFace is the most lightweight face recognition and facial attribute analysis library for Python, and is currently on the verge of human-level precision. OpenFace on the other hand is an open source deep learning facial recognition model based on Google's Facenet model. In this paper, we will discuss the face recognition comparison between two models DeepFace and OpenFace on the calibrators of (Accuracy, Error Rate and Verification Time). DeepFace showed a higher accuracy rate by (3%) than that of OpenFace, and a lower error rate by (3%). Whereas OpenFace delivered with a minimum time shorter than that of DeepFace by (0.061323) second.","PeriodicalId":16911,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pure & Applied Sciences","volume":"104 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Two Face Recognition Machine Learning Models\",\"authors\":\"صفاء سالم محمد دخيلة, نور الدين على احمد, هالة الشاعري\",\"doi\":\"10.51984/jopas.v21i4.2120\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Machine learning (ML) is one of the fastest-developing topics today, straddling the boundary between statistics and computer science, as well as data science. It is a type of artificial intelligence that allows software applications to become more accurate at predicting outcomes without being explicitly programmed. And It addresses the difficulty of the way to assemble gadgets that enhance themselves via experience, and make conclusions with minimum human assistance. For this purpose, there arises a need to use various statistical methods of face recognition’ models, such as (DeepFace) and (OpenFace). DeepFace is the most lightweight face recognition and facial attribute analysis library for Python, and is currently on the verge of human-level precision. OpenFace on the other hand is an open source deep learning facial recognition model based on Google's Facenet model. In this paper, we will discuss the face recognition comparison between two models DeepFace and OpenFace on the calibrators of (Accuracy, Error Rate and Verification Time). DeepFace showed a higher accuracy rate by (3%) than that of OpenFace, and a lower error rate by (3%). Whereas OpenFace delivered with a minimum time shorter than that of DeepFace by (0.061323) second.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16911,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pure & Applied Sciences\",\"volume\":\"104 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pure & Applied Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51984/jopas.v21i4.2120\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pure & Applied Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51984/jopas.v21i4.2120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

机器学习(ML)是当今发展最快的主题之一,跨越了统计学和计算机科学以及数据科学的界限。这是一种人工智能,它允许软件应用程序在没有明确编程的情况下更准确地预测结果。此外,它还解决了如何组装通过经验增强自身功能的小工具,并在最少的人工帮助下得出结论的困难。为此,需要使用各种人脸识别模型的统计方法,如(DeepFace)和(OpenFace)。DeepFace是Python最轻量级的人脸识别和面部属性分析库,目前接近人类水平的精度。另一方面,OpenFace是一个基于谷歌Facenet模型的开源深度学习面部识别模型。在本文中,我们将讨论DeepFace和OpenFace两种模型在(准确率、错误率和验证时间)校准器上的人脸识别比较。DeepFace的准确率比OpenFace高3%,错误率比OpenFace低3%。而OpenFace的最短交付时间比DeepFace短(0.061323)秒。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of Two Face Recognition Machine Learning Models
Machine learning (ML) is one of the fastest-developing topics today, straddling the boundary between statistics and computer science, as well as data science. It is a type of artificial intelligence that allows software applications to become more accurate at predicting outcomes without being explicitly programmed. And It addresses the difficulty of the way to assemble gadgets that enhance themselves via experience, and make conclusions with minimum human assistance. For this purpose, there arises a need to use various statistical methods of face recognition’ models, such as (DeepFace) and (OpenFace). DeepFace is the most lightweight face recognition and facial attribute analysis library for Python, and is currently on the verge of human-level precision. OpenFace on the other hand is an open source deep learning facial recognition model based on Google's Facenet model. In this paper, we will discuss the face recognition comparison between two models DeepFace and OpenFace on the calibrators of (Accuracy, Error Rate and Verification Time). DeepFace showed a higher accuracy rate by (3%) than that of OpenFace, and a lower error rate by (3%). Whereas OpenFace delivered with a minimum time shorter than that of DeepFace by (0.061323) second.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Integrating ChatGPT in Education and Learning: A Case Study on Libyan Universities The awareness of thyroid disorders and an iodine-rich diet among a sample of the population in some western cities of Libya التنوع الحيوي للهائمات الحيوانية في بحيرة محروقة منطقة الشاطئ-ليبيا تطبيق قواعد الأسبقية في تنفيذ الأعمال لغرض توازن خطوط التجميع باستخدام الجداول الإلكترونية تقدير البخر نتح المرجعي باستخدام نظام استدلال عصبي ضبابي مكيف بمنطقة شحات في ليبيا
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1