阿曼一家三级医院抗心律失常药物使用概况

IF 2.4 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pharmacy Practice-Granada Pub Date : 2023-06-30 DOI:10.18549/pharmpract.2023.2.2816
R. D. Castelino, K. Al Hashmi, M. Al Za’abi, Aly Abdelrahman
{"title":"阿曼一家三级医院抗心律失常药物使用概况","authors":"R. D. Castelino, K. Al Hashmi, M. Al Za’abi, Aly Abdelrahman","doi":"10.18549/pharmpract.2023.2.2816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Antiarrhythmic drugs are commonly used to treat arrhythmia. However, data on the usage pattern of antiarrhythmic drugs, associated side effects, and the role of clinical pharmacist interventions in the Middle East are scarce. Objective: The purpose of this study was to describe the usage pattern, side effects, and clinical pharmacist interventions of antiarrhythmic drugs at the Sultan Qaboos University Hospital (SQUH), a tertiary care hospital in Oman. Methods: This retrospective observational study included adult patients (≥18 years) who received at least one dose of antiarrhythmic drugs at SQUH between January 2020 and December 2021. Ethical approval was obtained prior to conducting the study. Results: In total, 400 patients were enrolled in this study. Their mean age was 62.5 ± 16.6 years (range:19-96), and 55.3% (221/400) were male. Atrial arrhythmias were the most commonly observed (344/400, 86.0%). Beta-blockers (337/500, 67.4%) were the most prescribed class of drugs. The most commonly prescribed drugs were bisoprolol (263/400, 65.8%), carvedilol (65/400, 16.3%), and amiodarone (59/400, 14.8%). The majority of patients (300/400, 75.0%) received monotherapy, whereas 25% (100/400) received combination therapy. A total of 109 side effects were reported in 45 patients, resulting in an incidence rate of 11.3 %, with cardiovascular side effects accounting for the majority (41/109, 37.6%) of these. Amiodarone had the highest prevalence of adverse effects (33/109, 30.3%). A total of 122 clinical pharmacist interventions were observed in 13.0 % (52/400) of patients. Beta-blockers were associated with more than half of the interventions (61/122, 50.0%). Age (61.84 years vs. 66.75 years; p=0.047), comorbidities (83.6% vs. 96.2%; p=0.019), renal impairment (19.6% vs. 40.4%; p=0.001, heart failure (11.8% vs. 28.9%; p=0.002), concomitant medications (84.5% vs. 98.1%; p=0.004), polypharmacy (51.1% vs. 69.2%; p=0.022) and duration of therapy of less than one year (9.3% vs. 27.3%; p<0.001) was significantly associated with the need for intervention. Conclusion: Beta-blockers were the most commonly prescribed antiarrhythmic drugs in SQUH. Amiodarone was associated with the highest prevalence of side effects. Clinical pharmacy intervention at the SQUH was mainly related to antiarrhythmic drug selection and dose optimization.","PeriodicalId":51762,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacy Practice-Granada","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Overview of the use of antiarrhythmic drugs at a tertiary hospital in Oman\",\"authors\":\"R. D. Castelino, K. Al Hashmi, M. Al Za’abi, Aly Abdelrahman\",\"doi\":\"10.18549/pharmpract.2023.2.2816\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Antiarrhythmic drugs are commonly used to treat arrhythmia. However, data on the usage pattern of antiarrhythmic drugs, associated side effects, and the role of clinical pharmacist interventions in the Middle East are scarce. Objective: The purpose of this study was to describe the usage pattern, side effects, and clinical pharmacist interventions of antiarrhythmic drugs at the Sultan Qaboos University Hospital (SQUH), a tertiary care hospital in Oman. Methods: This retrospective observational study included adult patients (≥18 years) who received at least one dose of antiarrhythmic drugs at SQUH between January 2020 and December 2021. Ethical approval was obtained prior to conducting the study. Results: In total, 400 patients were enrolled in this study. Their mean age was 62.5 ± 16.6 years (range:19-96), and 55.3% (221/400) were male. Atrial arrhythmias were the most commonly observed (344/400, 86.0%). Beta-blockers (337/500, 67.4%) were the most prescribed class of drugs. The most commonly prescribed drugs were bisoprolol (263/400, 65.8%), carvedilol (65/400, 16.3%), and amiodarone (59/400, 14.8%). The majority of patients (300/400, 75.0%) received monotherapy, whereas 25% (100/400) received combination therapy. A total of 109 side effects were reported in 45 patients, resulting in an incidence rate of 11.3 %, with cardiovascular side effects accounting for the majority (41/109, 37.6%) of these. Amiodarone had the highest prevalence of adverse effects (33/109, 30.3%). A total of 122 clinical pharmacist interventions were observed in 13.0 % (52/400) of patients. Beta-blockers were associated with more than half of the interventions (61/122, 50.0%). Age (61.84 years vs. 66.75 years; p=0.047), comorbidities (83.6% vs. 96.2%; p=0.019), renal impairment (19.6% vs. 40.4%; p=0.001, heart failure (11.8% vs. 28.9%; p=0.002), concomitant medications (84.5% vs. 98.1%; p=0.004), polypharmacy (51.1% vs. 69.2%; p=0.022) and duration of therapy of less than one year (9.3% vs. 27.3%; p<0.001) was significantly associated with the need for intervention. Conclusion: Beta-blockers were the most commonly prescribed antiarrhythmic drugs in SQUH. Amiodarone was associated with the highest prevalence of side effects. Clinical pharmacy intervention at the SQUH was mainly related to antiarrhythmic drug selection and dose optimization.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51762,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmacy Practice-Granada\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmacy Practice-Granada\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18549/pharmpract.2023.2.2816\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacy Practice-Granada","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18549/pharmpract.2023.2.2816","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:抗心律失常药物是治疗心律失常的常用药物。然而,关于中东地区抗心律失常药物的使用模式、相关副作用和临床药师干预作用的数据很少。目的:本研究的目的是描述阿曼苏丹卡布斯大学医院(SQUH)抗心律失常药物的使用模式、副作用和临床药师干预措施。方法:这项回顾性观察性研究纳入了2020年1月至2021年12月期间在SQUH接受至少一剂抗心律失常药物治疗的成年患者(≥18岁)。在进行研究之前获得了伦理批准。结果:本研究共纳入400例患者。平均年龄62.5±16.6岁(范围:19 ~ 96岁),男性占55.3%(221/400)。房性心律失常最常见(344/400,86.0%)。-受体阻滞剂(337/500,67.4%)是处方最多的一类药物。最常用的处方药物为比索洛尔(263/400,65.8%)、卡维地洛尔(65/400,16.3%)和胺碘酮(59/400,14.8%)。大多数患者(300/400,75.0%)接受单一治疗,而25%(100/400)接受联合治疗。45例患者共报告109种不良反应,发生率为11.3%,其中心血管不良反应占多数(41/109,37.6%)。胺碘酮不良反应发生率最高(33/109,30.3%)。临床药师干预122次,占13.0%(52/400)。β受体阻滞剂与半数以上的干预措施相关(61/122,50.0%)。年龄(61.84岁vs 66.75岁;P =0.047),合并症(83.6% vs. 96.2%;P =0.019),肾功能损害(19.6% vs. 40.4%;P =0.001,心力衰竭(11.8% vs. 28.9%;P =0.002),合并用药(84.5% vs. 98.1%;P =0.004),多药(51.1% vs. 69.2%;P =0.022),治疗时间小于1年(9.3% vs. 27.3%;P <0.001)与干预需求显著相关。结论:受体阻滞剂是SQUH患者最常用的抗心律失常药物。胺碘酮的副作用发生率最高。医院的临床药学干预主要与抗心律失常药物的选择和剂量优化有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Overview of the use of antiarrhythmic drugs at a tertiary hospital in Oman
Background: Antiarrhythmic drugs are commonly used to treat arrhythmia. However, data on the usage pattern of antiarrhythmic drugs, associated side effects, and the role of clinical pharmacist interventions in the Middle East are scarce. Objective: The purpose of this study was to describe the usage pattern, side effects, and clinical pharmacist interventions of antiarrhythmic drugs at the Sultan Qaboos University Hospital (SQUH), a tertiary care hospital in Oman. Methods: This retrospective observational study included adult patients (≥18 years) who received at least one dose of antiarrhythmic drugs at SQUH between January 2020 and December 2021. Ethical approval was obtained prior to conducting the study. Results: In total, 400 patients were enrolled in this study. Their mean age was 62.5 ± 16.6 years (range:19-96), and 55.3% (221/400) were male. Atrial arrhythmias were the most commonly observed (344/400, 86.0%). Beta-blockers (337/500, 67.4%) were the most prescribed class of drugs. The most commonly prescribed drugs were bisoprolol (263/400, 65.8%), carvedilol (65/400, 16.3%), and amiodarone (59/400, 14.8%). The majority of patients (300/400, 75.0%) received monotherapy, whereas 25% (100/400) received combination therapy. A total of 109 side effects were reported in 45 patients, resulting in an incidence rate of 11.3 %, with cardiovascular side effects accounting for the majority (41/109, 37.6%) of these. Amiodarone had the highest prevalence of adverse effects (33/109, 30.3%). A total of 122 clinical pharmacist interventions were observed in 13.0 % (52/400) of patients. Beta-blockers were associated with more than half of the interventions (61/122, 50.0%). Age (61.84 years vs. 66.75 years; p=0.047), comorbidities (83.6% vs. 96.2%; p=0.019), renal impairment (19.6% vs. 40.4%; p=0.001, heart failure (11.8% vs. 28.9%; p=0.002), concomitant medications (84.5% vs. 98.1%; p=0.004), polypharmacy (51.1% vs. 69.2%; p=0.022) and duration of therapy of less than one year (9.3% vs. 27.3%; p<0.001) was significantly associated with the need for intervention. Conclusion: Beta-blockers were the most commonly prescribed antiarrhythmic drugs in SQUH. Amiodarone was associated with the highest prevalence of side effects. Clinical pharmacy intervention at the SQUH was mainly related to antiarrhythmic drug selection and dose optimization.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmacy Practice-Granada
Pharmacy Practice-Granada PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.00%
发文量
113
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Pharmacy Practice is a free full-text peer-reviewed journal with a scope on pharmacy practice. Pharmacy Practice is published quarterly. Pharmacy Practice does not charge and will never charge any publication fee or article processing charge (APC) to the authors. The current and future absence of any article processing charges (APCs) is signed in the MoU with the Center for Pharmacy Practice Innovation (CPPI) at Virginia Commonwealth University (VCU) School of Pharmacy. Pharmacy Practice is the consequence of the efforts of a number of colleagues from different Universities who belief in collaborative publishing: no one pays, no one receives. Although focusing on the practice of pharmacy, Pharmacy Practice covers a wide range of pharmacy activities, among them and not being comprehensive, clinical pharmacy, pharmaceutical care, social pharmacy, pharmacy education, process and outcome research, health promotion and education, health informatics, pharmacoepidemiology, etc.
期刊最新文献
Psychometric properties of a mental health literacy questionnaire for university students in Indonesia Mini review: The clinical avenues of combined hydralazine-nitrate in subjects with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction Pharmacy licensees and their characters that affect Good Pharmacy Practice (GPP) Compliance Factors related to non-adherence to antiretroviral treatment in children under 13 years of age Pattern of drug therapy related problems encountered by clinical pharmacists in a critical care setting in Nepal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1