细菌觅食优化算法、粒子群优化算法与遗传算法的比较研究

IF 1.7 3区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE International Journal of Bio-Inspired Computation Pub Date : 2016-01-01 DOI:10.1504/IJBIC.2016.10004342
Soheila Sadeghiram
{"title":"细菌觅食优化算法、粒子群优化算法与遗传算法的比较研究","authors":"Soheila Sadeghiram","doi":"10.1504/IJBIC.2016.10004342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nature inspired meta-heuristic algorithms have been widely used in order to find efficient solutions for optimisation problems, and granted results have been achieved. Particle swarm optimisation (PSO) algorithm is one of the most utilised algorithms in recent years, which has indicated acceptable efficiency. On the other hand, bacterial foraging optimisation algorithm (BFOA) is relatively new compared to other meta-heuristic algorithms, and like PSO has shown a good ability to solve different optimisation problems. Genetic algorithms (GAs) are a well-known group of meta-heuristic algorithms which have been in use earlier than the other in various research fields. In this paper, we compare the efficiency of BFOA and PSO algorithms in an identical condition by minimising different test functions (from two to 20 dimensional). In this experiment, GA is used as a basic method in comparing the two algorithms. The methodology and results are presented. Although results verify the accurate convergency of both algorithms, the efficiency of BFOA on high-dimensional functions is dramatically better than that of PSO.","PeriodicalId":49059,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Bio-Inspired Computation","volume":"53 1","pages":"275"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bacterial foraging optimisation algorithm, particle swarm optimisation and genetic algorithm: a comparative study\",\"authors\":\"Soheila Sadeghiram\",\"doi\":\"10.1504/IJBIC.2016.10004342\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Nature inspired meta-heuristic algorithms have been widely used in order to find efficient solutions for optimisation problems, and granted results have been achieved. Particle swarm optimisation (PSO) algorithm is one of the most utilised algorithms in recent years, which has indicated acceptable efficiency. On the other hand, bacterial foraging optimisation algorithm (BFOA) is relatively new compared to other meta-heuristic algorithms, and like PSO has shown a good ability to solve different optimisation problems. Genetic algorithms (GAs) are a well-known group of meta-heuristic algorithms which have been in use earlier than the other in various research fields. In this paper, we compare the efficiency of BFOA and PSO algorithms in an identical condition by minimising different test functions (from two to 20 dimensional). In this experiment, GA is used as a basic method in comparing the two algorithms. The methodology and results are presented. Although results verify the accurate convergency of both algorithms, the efficiency of BFOA on high-dimensional functions is dramatically better than that of PSO.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49059,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Bio-Inspired Computation\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"275\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Bio-Inspired Computation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIC.2016.10004342\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Bio-Inspired Computation","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIC.2016.10004342","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自然启发的元启发式算法已被广泛用于寻找优化问题的有效解决方案,并取得了公认的结果。粒子群优化算法(PSO)是近年来应用最广泛的算法之一,具有良好的效率。另一方面,细菌觅食优化算法(BFOA)与其他元启发式算法相比相对较新,并且与粒子群算法一样显示出较好的解决各种优化问题的能力。遗传算法是一种著名的元启发式算法,在各个研究领域都得到了较早的应用。在本文中,我们通过最小化不同的测试函数(从2维到20维)来比较BFOA和PSO算法在相同条件下的效率。在本实验中,采用遗传算法作为比较两种算法的基本方法。给出了方法和结果。虽然结果验证了两种算法的精确收敛性,但BFOA在高维函数上的效率明显优于粒子群算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bacterial foraging optimisation algorithm, particle swarm optimisation and genetic algorithm: a comparative study
Nature inspired meta-heuristic algorithms have been widely used in order to find efficient solutions for optimisation problems, and granted results have been achieved. Particle swarm optimisation (PSO) algorithm is one of the most utilised algorithms in recent years, which has indicated acceptable efficiency. On the other hand, bacterial foraging optimisation algorithm (BFOA) is relatively new compared to other meta-heuristic algorithms, and like PSO has shown a good ability to solve different optimisation problems. Genetic algorithms (GAs) are a well-known group of meta-heuristic algorithms which have been in use earlier than the other in various research fields. In this paper, we compare the efficiency of BFOA and PSO algorithms in an identical condition by minimising different test functions (from two to 20 dimensional). In this experiment, GA is used as a basic method in comparing the two algorithms. The methodology and results are presented. Although results verify the accurate convergency of both algorithms, the efficiency of BFOA on high-dimensional functions is dramatically better than that of PSO.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Bio-Inspired Computation
International Journal of Bio-Inspired Computation COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
5.70%
发文量
37
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: IJBIC discusses the new bio-inspired computation methodologies derived from the animal and plant world, such as new algorithms mimicking the wolf schooling, the plant survival process, etc. Topics covered include: -New bio-inspired methodologies coming from creatures living in nature artificial society- physical/chemical phenomena- New bio-inspired methodology analysis tools, e.g. rough sets, stochastic processes- Brain-inspired methods: models and algorithms- Bio-inspired computation with big data: algorithms and structures- Applications associated with bio-inspired methodologies, e.g. bioinformatics.
期刊最新文献
Design of optimized lung lobe segmentation and Deep learning model for effective COVID-19 prediction Collaborative manufacturing operation mode and modeling simulation of manufacturing enterprise based on collective intelligence UAV Path Planning in Presence of Occlusions as Noisy Combinatorial Multi-Objective Optimisation On the Effect of Particle Update Modes in Particle Swarm Optimization Improved Whale Social Optimization Algorithm and deep fuzzy clustering for optimal and QoS-aware load balancing in cloud computing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1