互联网上博客的可信度——年龄对批评程度的影响

Sharon Greenberg, Eti Yaari, J. Bar-Ilan
{"title":"互联网上博客的可信度——年龄对批评程度的影响","authors":"Sharon Greenberg, Eti Yaari, J. Bar-Ilan","doi":"10.1108/00012531311297159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to describe a study that examined the perceived credibility of blogs on the internet and the medical information published in them as perceived by the readers of these blogs.Design/methodology/approach – A total of six blogs each with two posts were constructed, one on conventional treatment and the other on an alternative treatment of diabetes. In total, 361 participants viewed one blog each and filled in a questionnaire of the perceived credibility of the blog, the author of the blog and its message.Findings – The results of the study indicate an attitude of scepticism and/or criticism of many aspects of the information in the blogs, together with the growing use of blogs to find information on medical topics. It seems that users apply scepticism as a way to deal with the lack of certainty as to the credibility of the information in spite of their desire and readiness to use this information.Research limitations/implications – The users who took part in the experim...","PeriodicalId":55449,"journal":{"name":"Aslib Proceedings","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceived credibility of blogs on the internet - the influence of age on the extent of criticism\",\"authors\":\"Sharon Greenberg, Eti Yaari, J. Bar-Ilan\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/00012531311297159\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to describe a study that examined the perceived credibility of blogs on the internet and the medical information published in them as perceived by the readers of these blogs.Design/methodology/approach – A total of six blogs each with two posts were constructed, one on conventional treatment and the other on an alternative treatment of diabetes. In total, 361 participants viewed one blog each and filled in a questionnaire of the perceived credibility of the blog, the author of the blog and its message.Findings – The results of the study indicate an attitude of scepticism and/or criticism of many aspects of the information in the blogs, together with the growing use of blogs to find information on medical topics. It seems that users apply scepticism as a way to deal with the lack of certainty as to the credibility of the information in spite of their desire and readiness to use this information.Research limitations/implications – The users who took part in the experim...\",\"PeriodicalId\":55449,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aslib Proceedings\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aslib Proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/00012531311297159\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aslib Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/00012531311297159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

目的-本文的目的是描述一项研究,该研究调查了互联网上博客的感知可信度以及这些博客的读者所感知的在其中发布的医学信息。设计/方法/方法-共建立了六个博客,每个博客有两篇文章,一篇是关于糖尿病的常规治疗,另一篇是关于糖尿病的替代治疗。总共有361名参与者浏览了一个博客,并填写了一份关于博客可信度、博客作者及其信息的调查问卷。调查结果-研究结果表明,人们对博客中信息的许多方面持怀疑和/或批评态度,同时越来越多地使用博客来查找有关医学主题的信息。尽管用户希望并准备使用这些信息,但他们似乎将怀疑主义作为处理信息可信度缺乏确定性的一种方式。研究限制/影响-参与实验的用户…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Perceived credibility of blogs on the internet - the influence of age on the extent of criticism
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to describe a study that examined the perceived credibility of blogs on the internet and the medical information published in them as perceived by the readers of these blogs.Design/methodology/approach – A total of six blogs each with two posts were constructed, one on conventional treatment and the other on an alternative treatment of diabetes. In total, 361 participants viewed one blog each and filled in a questionnaire of the perceived credibility of the blog, the author of the blog and its message.Findings – The results of the study indicate an attitude of scepticism and/or criticism of many aspects of the information in the blogs, together with the growing use of blogs to find information on medical topics. It seems that users apply scepticism as a way to deal with the lack of certainty as to the credibility of the information in spite of their desire and readiness to use this information.Research limitations/implications – The users who took part in the experim...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Aslib Proceedings
Aslib Proceedings 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Unearthing historical insights: semantic organization and application of historical newspapers from a fine-grained knowledge element perspective Investigating the consumption behavior of young adults using online food delivery platforms during the COVID-19 pandemic Factors influencing customer satisfaction with AR shopping assistant applications in e-commerce: an empirical analysis utilizing text-mining techniques The role of positive online reviews in risk-based consumer behaviours: an information processing perspective Assessing the informational credibility of conspiracy theories: online discussion about the Nord Stream damage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1