话语转向“公众对可持续发展科学的理解”(PUSS)

S. Atchia
{"title":"话语转向“公众对可持续发展科学的理解”(PUSS)","authors":"S. Atchia","doi":"10.51474/jer.v12i1.594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Science represents the body of knowledge which has been shaping the world, and it forms the basis of every discipline ranging from the core science to philosophy.  Fundamentally, the understanding of science is two-fold, where one is related to the science of the common people while the other is related to high-order scientific ideas, theories, and research. In this era of the fourth industrialisation, the challenge is not limited to the training of top scientists but to making science accessible to every one by bringing science to the lay public. This is where the ‘Public understanding of sustainability science (PUSS)’ represents a key concept as it aims at transforming the lay public into informed citizens with the appropriate knowledge, know-how, skills, attitudes, and values required to understand and face current and future challenges such as the energy crisis, climate change, emergence, and re-emergence of new epidemics, using an integrated approach. The ‘Public Understanding of Science (PUS)’, as a dimension, originated during the late 1980s from the concept of ‘science literacy’ as a response to the public deficit discourse at that time, where the focus of science was shifting from knowledge to attitudes. And during the last decade, the public deficit discourse on trust deficiency shifted the paradigm from PUS to ‘science in-and-of society’.  However, today the discourse has reached a new dimension where the public trust deficit is already being questioned and challenged. As a response to such discourse, this case study analysed the current public interrogations and challenges using the ‘co-production of knowledge model’ with the lens of the public deficit theory to better prepare the public to face current and future challenges.  Consequently, the PUSS has been identified as the new paradigm to address the current public deficits.","PeriodicalId":32077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education and Research","volume":"118 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Shift in Discourse Towards ‘Public Understanding of Sustainability Science’ (PUSS)\",\"authors\":\"S. Atchia\",\"doi\":\"10.51474/jer.v12i1.594\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Science represents the body of knowledge which has been shaping the world, and it forms the basis of every discipline ranging from the core science to philosophy.  Fundamentally, the understanding of science is two-fold, where one is related to the science of the common people while the other is related to high-order scientific ideas, theories, and research. In this era of the fourth industrialisation, the challenge is not limited to the training of top scientists but to making science accessible to every one by bringing science to the lay public. This is where the ‘Public understanding of sustainability science (PUSS)’ represents a key concept as it aims at transforming the lay public into informed citizens with the appropriate knowledge, know-how, skills, attitudes, and values required to understand and face current and future challenges such as the energy crisis, climate change, emergence, and re-emergence of new epidemics, using an integrated approach. The ‘Public Understanding of Science (PUS)’, as a dimension, originated during the late 1980s from the concept of ‘science literacy’ as a response to the public deficit discourse at that time, where the focus of science was shifting from knowledge to attitudes. And during the last decade, the public deficit discourse on trust deficiency shifted the paradigm from PUS to ‘science in-and-of society’.  However, today the discourse has reached a new dimension where the public trust deficit is already being questioned and challenged. As a response to such discourse, this case study analysed the current public interrogations and challenges using the ‘co-production of knowledge model’ with the lens of the public deficit theory to better prepare the public to face current and future challenges.  Consequently, the PUSS has been identified as the new paradigm to address the current public deficits.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32077,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Education and Research\",\"volume\":\"118 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Education and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51474/jer.v12i1.594\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51474/jer.v12i1.594","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

科学代表了塑造世界的知识体系,它构成了从核心科学到哲学的每一门学科的基础。从根本上说,对科学的理解是双重的,其中一个与普通人的科学有关,另一个与高层次的科学思想、理论和研究有关。在这个第四次工业化时代,挑战不仅限于培养顶尖科学家,而是通过将科学带给非专业公众,让每个人都能接触到科学。这就是“公众对可持续性科学的理解(PUSS)”代表的关键概念,因为它旨在将普通公众转变为知情的公民,使其具备理解和面对当前和未来挑战所需的适当知识、技能、技能、态度和价值观,如能源危机、气候变化、新流行病的出现和重新出现等。“公众对科学的理解(PUS)”作为一个维度,起源于20世纪80年代末,作为对当时公共赤字话语的回应,“科学素养”的概念,当时科学的焦点正在从知识转向态度。在过去十年中,关于信任缺失的公共赤字论述将范式从PUS转向了“社会科学”。然而,今天的话语已经达到了一个新的维度,公众信任赤字已经受到质疑和挑战。作为对这种话语的回应,本案例研究利用“知识的共同生产模型”和公共赤字理论的视角,分析了当前公众的质疑和挑战,以更好地为公众面对当前和未来的挑战做好准备。因此,PUSS已被确定为解决当前公共赤字的新范例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Shift in Discourse Towards ‘Public Understanding of Sustainability Science’ (PUSS)
Science represents the body of knowledge which has been shaping the world, and it forms the basis of every discipline ranging from the core science to philosophy.  Fundamentally, the understanding of science is two-fold, where one is related to the science of the common people while the other is related to high-order scientific ideas, theories, and research. In this era of the fourth industrialisation, the challenge is not limited to the training of top scientists but to making science accessible to every one by bringing science to the lay public. This is where the ‘Public understanding of sustainability science (PUSS)’ represents a key concept as it aims at transforming the lay public into informed citizens with the appropriate knowledge, know-how, skills, attitudes, and values required to understand and face current and future challenges such as the energy crisis, climate change, emergence, and re-emergence of new epidemics, using an integrated approach. The ‘Public Understanding of Science (PUS)’, as a dimension, originated during the late 1980s from the concept of ‘science literacy’ as a response to the public deficit discourse at that time, where the focus of science was shifting from knowledge to attitudes. And during the last decade, the public deficit discourse on trust deficiency shifted the paradigm from PUS to ‘science in-and-of society’.  However, today the discourse has reached a new dimension where the public trust deficit is already being questioned and challenged. As a response to such discourse, this case study analysed the current public interrogations and challenges using the ‘co-production of knowledge model’ with the lens of the public deficit theory to better prepare the public to face current and future challenges.  Consequently, the PUSS has been identified as the new paradigm to address the current public deficits.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊最新文献
Occupational Shift from Agricultural to Non-Agricultural Sectors in Semi Urban Area Technical and Vocational Education and Training (Tvet) Program Experiences for Persons with Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury in Nepal: A Narrative Inquiry Perceptions of Apprentices on the Dual Apprenticeship Programme in Benin: A Narrative Inquiry Skills Mismatch in Entry-level Programmer Positions: Employer Expectations vs. Observations in Lalitpur, Nepal Exploring Dimensions of Accountability in Community Schools
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1