特刊简介

B. Demarest, J. Regier, C. Wolfe
{"title":"特刊简介","authors":"B. Demarest, J. Regier, C. Wolfe","doi":"10.1086/715975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this special issue is to explore varieties of animism in western European natural philosophy from the sixteenth to the eighteenth centuries. The issue focuses on “natural-philosophical animism,” by which we mean the position that the soul, along with its various faculties and powers, is integral to the functioning of nature as a whole, or to the functioning of some natural entities. The term “animism” was coined in the second half of the eighteenth century, first in French and then migrating to English, and it emerged in connection with the work of the Halle professor of medicine Georg Ernst Stahl (1659–1734). It came to be used as a general term for a variety of positions that challenged the mechanist and materialist accounts of nature that proliferated during the early modern period. Soon enough, “animism” became a catchall for doctrines that lost out to modern science. This opposition between animist and material, or animist and mechanical, has profoundly marked the history of sciences: one of the achievements of the Scientific Revolution and Enlightenment was, the usual story goes, to remove the soul and its forces from scientific investigation.However, when we reconsider the history of animism from the Renaissance on, we find complex overlays of the animate and materialist (or, later, animate and mechanical) in the same","PeriodicalId":42878,"journal":{"name":"HOPOS-The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science","volume":"99 1","pages":"494 - 501"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Special Issue Introduction\",\"authors\":\"B. Demarest, J. Regier, C. Wolfe\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/715975\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this special issue is to explore varieties of animism in western European natural philosophy from the sixteenth to the eighteenth centuries. The issue focuses on “natural-philosophical animism,” by which we mean the position that the soul, along with its various faculties and powers, is integral to the functioning of nature as a whole, or to the functioning of some natural entities. The term “animism” was coined in the second half of the eighteenth century, first in French and then migrating to English, and it emerged in connection with the work of the Halle professor of medicine Georg Ernst Stahl (1659–1734). It came to be used as a general term for a variety of positions that challenged the mechanist and materialist accounts of nature that proliferated during the early modern period. Soon enough, “animism” became a catchall for doctrines that lost out to modern science. This opposition between animist and material, or animist and mechanical, has profoundly marked the history of sciences: one of the achievements of the Scientific Revolution and Enlightenment was, the usual story goes, to remove the soul and its forces from scientific investigation.However, when we reconsider the history of animism from the Renaissance on, we find complex overlays of the animate and materialist (or, later, animate and mechanical) in the same\",\"PeriodicalId\":42878,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HOPOS-The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science\",\"volume\":\"99 1\",\"pages\":\"494 - 501\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HOPOS-The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/715975\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HOPOS-The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/715975","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本特刊的目的是探讨从16世纪到18世纪的西欧自然哲学中的万物有灵论。这个问题集中在“自然哲学万物有灵论”上,我们的意思是灵魂,连同它的各种能力和力量,是作为一个整体的自然运作的组成部分,或者是一些自然实体的运作。“万物有灵论”一词在18世纪下半叶被创造出来,首先是在法语中,然后迁移到英语中,它与哈雷大学医学教授乔治·恩斯特·斯塔尔(1659-1734)的工作有关。它被用作各种立场的总称,这些立场挑战了机械论和唯物主义对自然的描述,这些观点在现代早期激增。很快,“万物有灵论”就成为了被现代科学所淘汰的各种学说的统称。万物有灵论与物质论,或万物有灵论与机械论之间的对立,在科学史上留下了深刻的印记:按照通常的说法,科学革命和启蒙运动的成就之一,就是将灵魂及其力量从科学研究中剔除。然而,当我们重新考虑文艺复兴以来万物有灵论的历史时,我们发现有生命和唯物主义(或者后来的有生命和机械)的复杂叠加在一起
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Special Issue Introduction
The aim of this special issue is to explore varieties of animism in western European natural philosophy from the sixteenth to the eighteenth centuries. The issue focuses on “natural-philosophical animism,” by which we mean the position that the soul, along with its various faculties and powers, is integral to the functioning of nature as a whole, or to the functioning of some natural entities. The term “animism” was coined in the second half of the eighteenth century, first in French and then migrating to English, and it emerged in connection with the work of the Halle professor of medicine Georg Ernst Stahl (1659–1734). It came to be used as a general term for a variety of positions that challenged the mechanist and materialist accounts of nature that proliferated during the early modern period. Soon enough, “animism” became a catchall for doctrines that lost out to modern science. This opposition between animist and material, or animist and mechanical, has profoundly marked the history of sciences: one of the achievements of the Scientific Revolution and Enlightenment was, the usual story goes, to remove the soul and its forces from scientific investigation.However, when we reconsider the history of animism from the Renaissance on, we find complex overlays of the animate and materialist (or, later, animate and mechanical) in the same
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
Conceptual Analysis and the Analytic Method in Kant’s Prize Essay Johann Nikolaus Tetens (1736-1807) and the Idea of Phoneme. A Chapter in the History of Linguistic Thought What Conceptual Engineering Can Learn From The History of Philosophy of Science: Healthy Externalism and Metasemantic Plasticity Sellars, Analyticity, and a Dynamic Picture of Language Special Section Introduction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1