{"title":"了解功能的分散(在荷兰、日本、美国和德国的实践比较)","authors":"Irfan Ridwan Maksum","doi":"10.17304/IJIL.VOL4.3.156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Functional decentralisation practices in developing countries are mixed with the so-called privatisation which is a part of economic desentalisation and/or delegatuon of administrative decentralisation. This concept research is important in order to understand the concet of decentralisation as a whole. This article tries to make comparison of functional decentralisation practices in four countries: the Netherlands, Japan, the United States, ang Germany.","PeriodicalId":36998,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal of International and Comparative Law","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Memahami Desentralisasi Fungsional (Perbandingan Praktek di Belanda, Jepang, USA, dan Jerman)\",\"authors\":\"Irfan Ridwan Maksum\",\"doi\":\"10.17304/IJIL.VOL4.3.156\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Functional decentralisation practices in developing countries are mixed with the so-called privatisation which is a part of economic desentalisation and/or delegatuon of administrative decentralisation. This concept research is important in order to understand the concet of decentralisation as a whole. This article tries to make comparison of functional decentralisation practices in four countries: the Netherlands, Japan, the United States, ang Germany.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36998,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indonesian Journal of International and Comparative Law\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indonesian Journal of International and Comparative Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17304/IJIL.VOL4.3.156\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal of International and Comparative Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17304/IJIL.VOL4.3.156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
Memahami Desentralisasi Fungsional (Perbandingan Praktek di Belanda, Jepang, USA, dan Jerman)
Functional decentralisation practices in developing countries are mixed with the so-called privatisation which is a part of economic desentalisation and/or delegatuon of administrative decentralisation. This concept research is important in order to understand the concet of decentralisation as a whole. This article tries to make comparison of functional decentralisation practices in four countries: the Netherlands, Japan, the United States, ang Germany.