供应链合作伙伴的对冲决策框架

P. Kouvelis, Xiaole Wu, Yixuan Xiao
{"title":"供应链合作伙伴的对冲决策框架","authors":"P. Kouvelis, Xiaole Wu, Yixuan Xiao","doi":"10.1561/0200000082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study cash flow risk hedging in a bilateral supply chain of a supplier and a manufacturer that use internal cash to invest in production efficiency improvements. The associated production efficiency function is convex in capital investment. We offer a conceptual framework for understanding supply chain cash hedging strategies by decomposing the difference of a firm’s expected profit of hedging versus not hedging into a sum of two terms: the cost reduction effect and the flexibility effect of hedging. We find that the correlation of cash flow risks of supply chain partners significantly affects the hedging decisions of firms via impacts on production efficiencies. When the cash flows of firms are independent, the cost reduction effect favors hedging, whereas the flexibility effect favors not hedging. A firm is more likely to hedge when the supply chain is more profitable or its supply chain partner hedges. When the cash flows of firms are correlated, the cost reduction and flexibility effect of hedging may complement each other and support the same hedging choice. The impact of market size on firms’ hedging decisions is contingent on the cash flow correlation.","PeriodicalId":39990,"journal":{"name":"Foundations and Trends in Technology, Information and Operations Management","volume":"390 1","pages":"189-200"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Framework of Hedging Decisions for Supply Chain Partners\",\"authors\":\"P. Kouvelis, Xiaole Wu, Yixuan Xiao\",\"doi\":\"10.1561/0200000082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We study cash flow risk hedging in a bilateral supply chain of a supplier and a manufacturer that use internal cash to invest in production efficiency improvements. The associated production efficiency function is convex in capital investment. We offer a conceptual framework for understanding supply chain cash hedging strategies by decomposing the difference of a firm’s expected profit of hedging versus not hedging into a sum of two terms: the cost reduction effect and the flexibility effect of hedging. We find that the correlation of cash flow risks of supply chain partners significantly affects the hedging decisions of firms via impacts on production efficiencies. When the cash flows of firms are independent, the cost reduction effect favors hedging, whereas the flexibility effect favors not hedging. A firm is more likely to hedge when the supply chain is more profitable or its supply chain partner hedges. When the cash flows of firms are correlated, the cost reduction and flexibility effect of hedging may complement each other and support the same hedging choice. The impact of market size on firms’ hedging decisions is contingent on the cash flow correlation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39990,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Foundations and Trends in Technology, Information and Operations Management\",\"volume\":\"390 1\",\"pages\":\"189-200\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Foundations and Trends in Technology, Information and Operations Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1561/0200000082\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foundations and Trends in Technology, Information and Operations Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1561/0200000082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本文研究了供应商和制造商双边供应链中使用内部现金投资提高生产效率的现金流风险对冲。相关的生产效率函数在资本投资中是凸的。我们提供了一个概念性框架来理解供应链现金套期保值策略,通过将套期保值与不套期保值的企业预期利润的差异分解为两个术语的总和:套期保值的成本降低效应和灵活性效应。我们发现供应链合作伙伴的现金流风险相关性通过影响生产效率显著影响企业的套期保值决策。当企业现金流量独立时,成本降低效应倾向于套期保值,而灵活性效应倾向于不套期保值。当供应链更有利可图或其供应链合作伙伴进行套期保值时,企业更有可能进行套期保值。当企业的现金流量存在相关性时,套期保值的成本降低效应和灵活性效应可以相互补充,支持相同的套期保值选择。市场规模对公司€™套期保值决策的影响取决于现金流量的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Framework of Hedging Decisions for Supply Chain Partners
We study cash flow risk hedging in a bilateral supply chain of a supplier and a manufacturer that use internal cash to invest in production efficiency improvements. The associated production efficiency function is convex in capital investment. We offer a conceptual framework for understanding supply chain cash hedging strategies by decomposing the difference of a firm’s expected profit of hedging versus not hedging into a sum of two terms: the cost reduction effect and the flexibility effect of hedging. We find that the correlation of cash flow risks of supply chain partners significantly affects the hedging decisions of firms via impacts on production efficiencies. When the cash flows of firms are independent, the cost reduction effect favors hedging, whereas the flexibility effect favors not hedging. A firm is more likely to hedge when the supply chain is more profitable or its supply chain partner hedges. When the cash flows of firms are correlated, the cost reduction and flexibility effect of hedging may complement each other and support the same hedging choice. The impact of market size on firms’ hedging decisions is contingent on the cash flow correlation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Foundations and Trends in Technology, Information and Operations Management
Foundations and Trends in Technology, Information and Operations Management Decision Sciences-Management Science and Operations Research
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
期刊最新文献
Intervention-based Research in Operations Management Supply Chain Transparency and Sustainability Operations Revenue Insurance Data Sharing in Innovations Coordination Problems in Platform Markets Under Uncertainty
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1