COVID-19对种族不容忍的框架效应:来自罗马尼亚的证据

IF 3.1 2区 社会学 Q1 AREA STUDIES East European Politics Pub Date : 2022-09-22 DOI:10.1080/21599165.2022.2122048
Amy H. Liu, E. Power, Meiying Xu
{"title":"COVID-19对种族不容忍的框架效应:来自罗马尼亚的证据","authors":"Amy H. Liu, E. Power, Meiying Xu","doi":"10.1080/21599165.2022.2122048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Studies of tolerance often employ an ethnic lens. Reports of increasing anti-Chinese racism during the pandemic is evidence. Yet, COVID-19 is a global pandemic. How the disease is framed matters. We employ a survey experiment in Romania – where there is a large Chinese population and an even larger Romanian migrant population – to show that when primed about COVID-19, people responded with Chinese exclusion – a result consistent with the ethnic politics literature. But surprisingly, we find no evidence of Romanians cutting their coethnics a break. These results challenge how we think about identities when studying ethnic politics and group (in)tolerance.","PeriodicalId":46570,"journal":{"name":"East European Politics","volume":"76 1","pages":"617 - 640"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The framing effects of COVID-19 on ethnic intolerance: evidence from Romania\",\"authors\":\"Amy H. Liu, E. Power, Meiying Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21599165.2022.2122048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Studies of tolerance often employ an ethnic lens. Reports of increasing anti-Chinese racism during the pandemic is evidence. Yet, COVID-19 is a global pandemic. How the disease is framed matters. We employ a survey experiment in Romania – where there is a large Chinese population and an even larger Romanian migrant population – to show that when primed about COVID-19, people responded with Chinese exclusion – a result consistent with the ethnic politics literature. But surprisingly, we find no evidence of Romanians cutting their coethnics a break. These results challenge how we think about identities when studying ethnic politics and group (in)tolerance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46570,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"East European Politics\",\"volume\":\"76 1\",\"pages\":\"617 - 640\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"East European Politics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2022.2122048\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East European Politics","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2022.2122048","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

关于宽容的研究经常采用种族视角。有关疫情期间反华种族主义加剧的报道就是证据。然而,COVID-19是一场全球大流行。这种疾病是如何形成的很重要。我们在罗马尼亚进行了一项调查实验,那里有大量的中国人口和更多的罗马尼亚移民人口,结果表明,当人们对COVID-19有初步了解时,他们的反应是排斥中国人,这一结果与民族政治文献一致。但令人惊讶的是,我们没有发现罗马尼亚人与他们的种族分离的证据。这些结果挑战了我们在研究种族政治和群体宽容时对身份的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The framing effects of COVID-19 on ethnic intolerance: evidence from Romania
ABSTRACT Studies of tolerance often employ an ethnic lens. Reports of increasing anti-Chinese racism during the pandemic is evidence. Yet, COVID-19 is a global pandemic. How the disease is framed matters. We employ a survey experiment in Romania – where there is a large Chinese population and an even larger Romanian migrant population – to show that when primed about COVID-19, people responded with Chinese exclusion – a result consistent with the ethnic politics literature. But surprisingly, we find no evidence of Romanians cutting their coethnics a break. These results challenge how we think about identities when studying ethnic politics and group (in)tolerance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
East European Politics
East European Politics POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
9.40%
发文量
37
期刊最新文献
Polarisation through deviation discourse: strategic usage of Europeanisation by political and media actors in Georgia. Are consociations bad for women? Assessing the effectiveness of gender quotas in Bosnia and Herzegovina and North Macedonia Polish martial law of 1981 as seen on Facebook. A comparative analysis between the Facebook posts of political parties Czech political parties and the war in Ukraine: continuity of foreign policy stances Comparing public attitudes towards internal and external EU sanctions: the role of populism, trust and Euroscepticism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1