意义建构与司法认定:网络P2P借贷平台非法集资行为刑事规制的难点与对策

IF 2 Q1 LINGUISTICS International Journal of Legal Discourse Pub Date : 2019-04-26 DOI:10.1515/ijld-2019-2018
Xinlin Peng, X. Luo, Jian Li
{"title":"意义建构与司法认定:网络P2P借贷平台非法集资行为刑事规制的难点与对策","authors":"Xinlin Peng, X. Luo, Jian Li","doi":"10.1515/ijld-2019-2018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract At present, there exist several difficulties in the criminal regulation of illegal fundraising activities on China’s P2P platforms, such as discovering, identifying, tracking, and preventing. To solve these difficulties in the criminal regulations, this study applies the problem-oriented approach to evaluate the meaning constructions of illegal fundraising behavior on online P2P lending platforms in the corresponding judicial identifications, that is, judicial regulations and interpretations. After analyzing the judicial documents of 192 criminal cases in China, this study finds that it is necessary to actively draw on successful extra-territorial experience, and further establish a reasonable balance between maintaining financial security and promoting financial innovation. Specifically, the judiciary could adjust the current single loose criminal policy into one that combines leniency with rigidity, perfect the criminal law and its interpretation system of illegal fundraising behavior on P2P platforms, strengthen the connection mechanism of punishment and execution, explore the specialized case-handling mechanism, and implement a case guidance system.","PeriodicalId":55934,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Legal Discourse","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Meaning construction and judicial identification: Difficulties and countermeasures of criminal regulation of illegal fundraising behavior on online P2P lending platforms\",\"authors\":\"Xinlin Peng, X. Luo, Jian Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/ijld-2019-2018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract At present, there exist several difficulties in the criminal regulation of illegal fundraising activities on China’s P2P platforms, such as discovering, identifying, tracking, and preventing. To solve these difficulties in the criminal regulations, this study applies the problem-oriented approach to evaluate the meaning constructions of illegal fundraising behavior on online P2P lending platforms in the corresponding judicial identifications, that is, judicial regulations and interpretations. After analyzing the judicial documents of 192 criminal cases in China, this study finds that it is necessary to actively draw on successful extra-territorial experience, and further establish a reasonable balance between maintaining financial security and promoting financial innovation. Specifically, the judiciary could adjust the current single loose criminal policy into one that combines leniency with rigidity, perfect the criminal law and its interpretation system of illegal fundraising behavior on P2P platforms, strengthen the connection mechanism of punishment and execution, explore the specialized case-handling mechanism, and implement a case guidance system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55934,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Legal Discourse\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Legal Discourse\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/ijld-2019-2018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Legal Discourse","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/ijld-2019-2018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

目前,我国P2P平台非法集资活动的刑事监管存在着发现、识别、跟踪、防范等难点。为解决刑事规制中的这些困难,本研究采用问题导向的方法,对相应司法认定即司法规制和司法解释中对网络P2P借贷平台非法集资行为的意义建构进行了评价。通过对中国192起刑事案件司法文书的分析,本研究发现有必要积极借鉴成功的域外经验,进一步在维护金融安全与促进金融创新之间建立合理的平衡。具体而言,司法部门可以将目前单一宽松的刑事政策调整为宽严相济,完善P2P平台非法集资行为的刑法及其解释体系,加强刑罚与执行的衔接机制,探索专门的办案机制,实行案件指导制度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Meaning construction and judicial identification: Difficulties and countermeasures of criminal regulation of illegal fundraising behavior on online P2P lending platforms
Abstract At present, there exist several difficulties in the criminal regulation of illegal fundraising activities on China’s P2P platforms, such as discovering, identifying, tracking, and preventing. To solve these difficulties in the criminal regulations, this study applies the problem-oriented approach to evaluate the meaning constructions of illegal fundraising behavior on online P2P lending platforms in the corresponding judicial identifications, that is, judicial regulations and interpretations. After analyzing the judicial documents of 192 criminal cases in China, this study finds that it is necessary to actively draw on successful extra-territorial experience, and further establish a reasonable balance between maintaining financial security and promoting financial innovation. Specifically, the judiciary could adjust the current single loose criminal policy into one that combines leniency with rigidity, perfect the criminal law and its interpretation system of illegal fundraising behavior on P2P platforms, strengthen the connection mechanism of punishment and execution, explore the specialized case-handling mechanism, and implement a case guidance system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
80.00%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
The de-legitimation of Machine Learning Algorithms (MLAs) in “The Social Dilemma” (2020): a post-digital cognitive-stylistic approach Language ideologies and speaker categorization: a case study from the U.S. legal system That-complement clauses signalling stance in Nigerian Supreme Court lead judgements: a corpus-based study Discourse patterning and recursion in the EU case law Repair in Ghanaian judicial discourse
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1