新住房社区的创造性叙述:证据综合

IF 0.8 Q3 URBAN STUDIES Housing Care and Support Pub Date : 2016-12-06 DOI:10.1108/HCS-10-2016-0010
G. Meads, A. Lees, Kit Tapson
{"title":"新住房社区的创造性叙述:证据综合","authors":"G. Meads, A. Lees, Kit Tapson","doi":"10.1108/HCS-10-2016-0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This paper reports the findings of a rapid evidence synthesis commissioned by the Diocese of Winchester with a remit to provide an empirical basis for church contributions to large housing community developments. It sought to respond to three questions concerning new community developments. These related to risks and causes of failure; learning from past corporate and intermediate tier interventions at diocesan and equivalent levels by religious denominations; and the transferable learning available from developments described in Community Health and Liveability literatures. \nDesign/methodology/approach: The review took a purposive approach to sampling evidence from within academic literature, policy and ‘think tank’ outputs and theological texts. The search was instigated with the use of key words (including New Settlements, Urban Redevelopment, Diocese, Faith and Community), principally within the SCOPUS, NIHR, PUBMED and Google Scholar databases. A pragmatic snowballing approach to relevant references was then employed. \nFindings: Segregation and separation were identified as the main risk for new settlements. Connectivity is required between and across neighbours, ensuring communal access to services, transport and recreation. Communal places where people can come together for conversation and social interaction are identified as contributing significantly to healthy communities. Churches have a particular positive contribution to make here, through a focus on inclusion, hospitality and common values, rather than single faith-based, evangelical approaches. \nResearch limitations/implications: \nThe initial effect of the study has been to increase confidence in and awareness of the diocesan contribution. In the longer term the three areas of practice highlighted for enhanced faith based contributions are those of public communications, community integration and civic leadership. An evidence based approach appears to be especially significant in facilitating the latter. \nOriginality/value: The importance of ‘creational narratives’ in defining and making explicit the values underpinning new housing communities, is identified as a singular source of shared motivation for planning and faith agencies.","PeriodicalId":43302,"journal":{"name":"Housing Care and Support","volume":"48 1","pages":"105-114"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Creational narratives for new housing communities: evidence synthesis\",\"authors\":\"G. Meads, A. Lees, Kit Tapson\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/HCS-10-2016-0010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: This paper reports the findings of a rapid evidence synthesis commissioned by the Diocese of Winchester with a remit to provide an empirical basis for church contributions to large housing community developments. It sought to respond to three questions concerning new community developments. These related to risks and causes of failure; learning from past corporate and intermediate tier interventions at diocesan and equivalent levels by religious denominations; and the transferable learning available from developments described in Community Health and Liveability literatures. \\nDesign/methodology/approach: The review took a purposive approach to sampling evidence from within academic literature, policy and ‘think tank’ outputs and theological texts. The search was instigated with the use of key words (including New Settlements, Urban Redevelopment, Diocese, Faith and Community), principally within the SCOPUS, NIHR, PUBMED and Google Scholar databases. A pragmatic snowballing approach to relevant references was then employed. \\nFindings: Segregation and separation were identified as the main risk for new settlements. Connectivity is required between and across neighbours, ensuring communal access to services, transport and recreation. Communal places where people can come together for conversation and social interaction are identified as contributing significantly to healthy communities. Churches have a particular positive contribution to make here, through a focus on inclusion, hospitality and common values, rather than single faith-based, evangelical approaches. \\nResearch limitations/implications: \\nThe initial effect of the study has been to increase confidence in and awareness of the diocesan contribution. In the longer term the three areas of practice highlighted for enhanced faith based contributions are those of public communications, community integration and civic leadership. An evidence based approach appears to be especially significant in facilitating the latter. \\nOriginality/value: The importance of ‘creational narratives’ in defining and making explicit the values underpinning new housing communities, is identified as a singular source of shared motivation for planning and faith agencies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43302,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Housing Care and Support\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"105-114\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Housing Care and Support\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/HCS-10-2016-0010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"URBAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Housing Care and Support","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/HCS-10-2016-0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:本文报告了温彻斯特教区委托进行的一项快速证据综合研究的结果,该研究的目的是为教会对大型住房社区发展的贡献提供经验基础。它试图回答有关新的社区发展的三个问题。这些与风险和失效原因有关;从过去各宗教教派在教区和同等级别的团体和中级干预中吸取教训;以及从社区健康和宜居性文献中描述的发展中获得的可转移学习。设计/方法/方法:本综述采用了一种有目的的方法,从学术文献、政策和“智库”产出以及神学文本中抽样证据。搜索使用关键词(包括新定居点,城市重建,教区,信仰和社区),主要在SCOPUS, NIHR, PUBMED和Google Scholar数据库中进行。然后对相关参考文献采用了务实的滚雪球式方法。研究结果:隔离和分离被确定为新定居点的主要风险。邻居之间和邻居之间需要连通性,以确保公共服务、交通和娱乐。人们可以聚集在一起交谈和社交的公共场所被认为对健康社区有重大贡献。通过注重包容、热情好客和共同价值观,而不是以单一信仰为基础的福音派做法,教会可以在这方面做出特别积极的贡献。研究局限/启示:这项研究的初步效果是增加对教区贡献的信心和认识。从长期来看,强调加强基于信仰的贡献的三个实践领域是公共通讯、社区融合和公民领导。以证据为基础的方法在促进后者方面似乎特别重要。原创性/价值:“创造性叙事”在定义和明确支撑新住房社区的价值方面的重要性,被认为是规划和信仰机构共同动机的单一来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Creational narratives for new housing communities: evidence synthesis
Purpose: This paper reports the findings of a rapid evidence synthesis commissioned by the Diocese of Winchester with a remit to provide an empirical basis for church contributions to large housing community developments. It sought to respond to three questions concerning new community developments. These related to risks and causes of failure; learning from past corporate and intermediate tier interventions at diocesan and equivalent levels by religious denominations; and the transferable learning available from developments described in Community Health and Liveability literatures. Design/methodology/approach: The review took a purposive approach to sampling evidence from within academic literature, policy and ‘think tank’ outputs and theological texts. The search was instigated with the use of key words (including New Settlements, Urban Redevelopment, Diocese, Faith and Community), principally within the SCOPUS, NIHR, PUBMED and Google Scholar databases. A pragmatic snowballing approach to relevant references was then employed. Findings: Segregation and separation were identified as the main risk for new settlements. Connectivity is required between and across neighbours, ensuring communal access to services, transport and recreation. Communal places where people can come together for conversation and social interaction are identified as contributing significantly to healthy communities. Churches have a particular positive contribution to make here, through a focus on inclusion, hospitality and common values, rather than single faith-based, evangelical approaches. Research limitations/implications: The initial effect of the study has been to increase confidence in and awareness of the diocesan contribution. In the longer term the three areas of practice highlighted for enhanced faith based contributions are those of public communications, community integration and civic leadership. An evidence based approach appears to be especially significant in facilitating the latter. Originality/value: The importance of ‘creational narratives’ in defining and making explicit the values underpinning new housing communities, is identified as a singular source of shared motivation for planning and faith agencies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Housing Care and Support
Housing Care and Support URBAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Social housing development: a case study in Bac Ninh province, Vietnam Reviewing the affordability and adequacy of affordable housing in urban India: Impact of the covid-19 pandemic Filling in the gaps: examining the prevalence of Black homelessness in Canada Advantages and challenges of extra care housing in the UK for people living with dementia: a scoping review Choosing invisibility? Exploring service (dis)engagement of women experiencing multiple disadvantage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1