神经肌肉阻滞剂在急性呼吸窘迫综合征中的应用:哪个变量是重要的?

Farshid Rahimibashar, M. Salesi, A. vahedian-azimi, Masoum Khosh Fetrat
{"title":"神经肌肉阻滞剂在急性呼吸窘迫综合征中的应用:哪个变量是重要的?","authors":"Farshid Rahimibashar, M. Salesi, A. vahedian-azimi, Masoum Khosh Fetrat","doi":"10.34172/hpr.2021.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The study of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) in the management of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has provided conflicting results in terms of their effect on mortality. Objectives: The main purpose of this study was to evaluate mortality in ARDS patients who underwent NMBA. Methods: A retrospective secondary analysis of 4200 patients with ARDS was collected from two academic medical centers, Tehran, Iran. This study was performed to assess the impact of NMBAs use in ARDS patients with different subgroups including mild and moderate-to-severe ARDS, age more and less than 65 years, having medical turnover vs. not-having, and high acute nursing care vs. moderate to low nursing care. Results: Intensive care unit (ICU) mortality has occurred in 1169 (27.8%) participants. The mortality rate was 28.6% and 27.5% in patients with mild and moderate-to-severe ARDS, respectively. In the subjects without medical turnover, the moderate dose of NMBAs significantly reduces the mortality of patients (P=0.044). In patients who need high acute nursing care, increasing the NMBAs dose significantly reduces patients’ mortality (P=0.010). In addition, increasing the NMBAs doses significantly reduces ICU length of stay (LOS). Conclusion: This study provides evidence that the administration of different doses of NMBAs had no effect on patients’ mortality with mild or moderate-to-severe ARDS. However, higher doses of NMBAs than low doses increased the risk of mortality in patients over 80 years and can reduce the risk of death in patients less than 55 years.","PeriodicalId":32113,"journal":{"name":"Hospital Practices and Research","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neuromuscular Blocking Agent Use in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Which Variable is Important?\",\"authors\":\"Farshid Rahimibashar, M. Salesi, A. vahedian-azimi, Masoum Khosh Fetrat\",\"doi\":\"10.34172/hpr.2021.22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The study of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) in the management of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has provided conflicting results in terms of their effect on mortality. Objectives: The main purpose of this study was to evaluate mortality in ARDS patients who underwent NMBA. Methods: A retrospective secondary analysis of 4200 patients with ARDS was collected from two academic medical centers, Tehran, Iran. This study was performed to assess the impact of NMBAs use in ARDS patients with different subgroups including mild and moderate-to-severe ARDS, age more and less than 65 years, having medical turnover vs. not-having, and high acute nursing care vs. moderate to low nursing care. Results: Intensive care unit (ICU) mortality has occurred in 1169 (27.8%) participants. The mortality rate was 28.6% and 27.5% in patients with mild and moderate-to-severe ARDS, respectively. In the subjects without medical turnover, the moderate dose of NMBAs significantly reduces the mortality of patients (P=0.044). In patients who need high acute nursing care, increasing the NMBAs dose significantly reduces patients’ mortality (P=0.010). In addition, increasing the NMBAs doses significantly reduces ICU length of stay (LOS). Conclusion: This study provides evidence that the administration of different doses of NMBAs had no effect on patients’ mortality with mild or moderate-to-severe ARDS. However, higher doses of NMBAs than low doses increased the risk of mortality in patients over 80 years and can reduce the risk of death in patients less than 55 years.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32113,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hospital Practices and Research\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hospital Practices and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34172/hpr.2021.22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital Practices and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/hpr.2021.22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:神经肌肉阻滞剂(nmba)治疗急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的研究在其对死亡率的影响方面提供了相互矛盾的结果。目的:本研究的主要目的是评估接受NMBA治疗的ARDS患者的死亡率。方法:对来自伊朗德黑兰两所学术医疗中心的4200例ARDS患者进行回顾性分析。本研究旨在评估nmba对不同亚组ARDS患者的影响,包括轻度和中度至重度ARDS,年龄大于和小于65岁,有医疗人员更换与无医疗人员更换,高度急性护理与中度至低护理。结果:1169名(27.8%)参与者在重症监护病房(ICU)死亡。轻、中、重度ARDS患者死亡率分别为28.6%和27.5%。在无医疗转换的受试者中,中等剂量的nmba显著降低了患者的死亡率(P=0.044)。在急性护理需求高的患者中,增加nmba剂量可显著降低患者死亡率(P=0.010)。此外,增加nmba剂量可显著减少ICU住院时间(LOS)。结论:本研究提供了不同剂量的NMBAs对轻、中至重度ARDS患者死亡率没有影响的证据。然而,与低剂量相比,高剂量的nmba增加了80岁以上患者的死亡风险,并可降低55岁以下患者的死亡风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Neuromuscular Blocking Agent Use in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Which Variable is Important?
Background: The study of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) in the management of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has provided conflicting results in terms of their effect on mortality. Objectives: The main purpose of this study was to evaluate mortality in ARDS patients who underwent NMBA. Methods: A retrospective secondary analysis of 4200 patients with ARDS was collected from two academic medical centers, Tehran, Iran. This study was performed to assess the impact of NMBAs use in ARDS patients with different subgroups including mild and moderate-to-severe ARDS, age more and less than 65 years, having medical turnover vs. not-having, and high acute nursing care vs. moderate to low nursing care. Results: Intensive care unit (ICU) mortality has occurred in 1169 (27.8%) participants. The mortality rate was 28.6% and 27.5% in patients with mild and moderate-to-severe ARDS, respectively. In the subjects without medical turnover, the moderate dose of NMBAs significantly reduces the mortality of patients (P=0.044). In patients who need high acute nursing care, increasing the NMBAs dose significantly reduces patients’ mortality (P=0.010). In addition, increasing the NMBAs doses significantly reduces ICU length of stay (LOS). Conclusion: This study provides evidence that the administration of different doses of NMBAs had no effect on patients’ mortality with mild or moderate-to-severe ARDS. However, higher doses of NMBAs than low doses increased the risk of mortality in patients over 80 years and can reduce the risk of death in patients less than 55 years.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Adjuvant Perioperative Intravenous Lidocaine is Effective and Safe for Postoperative Pain Management and Rehabilitation in Gynecology Surgery: A Randomized, Single-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial Serum Vitamin D, Renal Biomarkers, Protein Profile and Some Electrolytes in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients With a Clinical Trial of Vitamin D Therapy Investigating the Effect of Post-Delivery Telephone Counseling on the Rate of Exclusive Breastfeeding Among Infants An Investigation of the COVID-19-Related Anxiety Levels of Individuals According to Some Demographic Variables Determined the Frequency of Neurosurgeries Canceled Due to the Asymptomatic COVID-19 in the Patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1