生物多样性与知识产权:冲突还是协同

Rahul Sharma, Lavanya Madhusoodanan, Patrika Soni, Amit Dubey
{"title":"生物多样性与知识产权:冲突还是协同","authors":"Rahul Sharma,&nbsp;Lavanya Madhusoodanan,&nbsp;Patrika Soni,&nbsp;Amit Dubey","doi":"10.1111/jwip.12234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>India is a country with a diverse ecosystem. Traditional knowledge (TK) is an important element of Indian culture and society. Because of its diversity, India has been a victim of biopiracy on multiple occasions, though it has learned from the haldi, neem, and basmati episodes. While it is critical for countries to maintain their biodiversity and indigenous knowledge, it is also critical to protect the rights of those who add value to it and expand its usage through intellectual property rights (IPR). As a result, biodiversity conservation and IPR come into conflict. Biodiversity conservation conventions and statutes aim to strike a balance between the interests of both parties. The Biodiversity Act of 2002 in India stipulates that indigenous tribes must give their prior informed consent before accessing and utilizing a bioresource. It also establishes a legal framework for benefit sharing in various ways in the event that any intellectual property on the bioresource or relevant TK is acquired. However, putting the plan into action is still a struggle. This, in turn, deprives the true bearers of the relevant TK, who have either nurtured bioresources for years. The framework of biodiversity conservation legislation as a way of protecting TK holders' rights in the international and Indian contexts is discussed in this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":54129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of World Intellectual Property","volume":"25 2","pages":"460-472"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biodiversity and intellectual property rights: Conflict or synergy\",\"authors\":\"Rahul Sharma,&nbsp;Lavanya Madhusoodanan,&nbsp;Patrika Soni,&nbsp;Amit Dubey\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jwip.12234\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>India is a country with a diverse ecosystem. Traditional knowledge (TK) is an important element of Indian culture and society. Because of its diversity, India has been a victim of biopiracy on multiple occasions, though it has learned from the haldi, neem, and basmati episodes. While it is critical for countries to maintain their biodiversity and indigenous knowledge, it is also critical to protect the rights of those who add value to it and expand its usage through intellectual property rights (IPR). As a result, biodiversity conservation and IPR come into conflict. Biodiversity conservation conventions and statutes aim to strike a balance between the interests of both parties. The Biodiversity Act of 2002 in India stipulates that indigenous tribes must give their prior informed consent before accessing and utilizing a bioresource. It also establishes a legal framework for benefit sharing in various ways in the event that any intellectual property on the bioresource or relevant TK is acquired. However, putting the plan into action is still a struggle. This, in turn, deprives the true bearers of the relevant TK, who have either nurtured bioresources for years. The framework of biodiversity conservation legislation as a way of protecting TK holders' rights in the international and Indian contexts is discussed in this study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of World Intellectual Property\",\"volume\":\"25 2\",\"pages\":\"460-472\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of World Intellectual Property\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jwip.12234\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of World Intellectual Property","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jwip.12234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

印度是一个拥有多样化生态系统的国家。传统知识是印度文化和社会的重要组成部分。由于其多样性,印度多次成为生物剽窃的受害者,尽管它已经从haldi, neem和basmati事件中吸取了教训。虽然各国必须维护其生物多样性和本土知识,但保护那些为其增值并通过知识产权扩大其使用范围的人的权利也至关重要。因此,生物多样性保护与知识产权之间产生了冲突。生物多样性保护公约和法规旨在平衡双方的利益。印度2002年的《生物多样性法》规定,土著部落在获取和利用生物资源之前必须事先获得他们的知情同意。它还建立了一个法律框架,以便在获得有关生物资源的任何知识产权或相关传统知识的情况下以各种方式分享利益。然而,将计划付诸实施仍然是一场斗争。这反过来又剥夺了相关传统知识的真正持有者,他们要么培育了多年的生物资源。本研究探讨了生物多样性保护立法框架作为保护传统知识持有人权利的一种方式在国际和印度的背景下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Biodiversity and intellectual property rights: Conflict or synergy

India is a country with a diverse ecosystem. Traditional knowledge (TK) is an important element of Indian culture and society. Because of its diversity, India has been a victim of biopiracy on multiple occasions, though it has learned from the haldi, neem, and basmati episodes. While it is critical for countries to maintain their biodiversity and indigenous knowledge, it is also critical to protect the rights of those who add value to it and expand its usage through intellectual property rights (IPR). As a result, biodiversity conservation and IPR come into conflict. Biodiversity conservation conventions and statutes aim to strike a balance between the interests of both parties. The Biodiversity Act of 2002 in India stipulates that indigenous tribes must give their prior informed consent before accessing and utilizing a bioresource. It also establishes a legal framework for benefit sharing in various ways in the event that any intellectual property on the bioresource or relevant TK is acquired. However, putting the plan into action is still a struggle. This, in turn, deprives the true bearers of the relevant TK, who have either nurtured bioresources for years. The framework of biodiversity conservation legislation as a way of protecting TK holders' rights in the international and Indian contexts is discussed in this study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information The flexibilization of intellectual property rights in cases of health crises: A case study of Brazil in the face of the AIDS and COVID sanitary crises Factors influencing the prioritisation of access to medicines in trade-related intellectual property policymaking in Thailand Law libraries, copyright and digital lending
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1