终于!在孩子身上做一项随机2阶段试验:使用氢氧化物有用吗?

M. Polke
{"title":"终于!在孩子身上做一项随机2阶段试验:使用氢氧化物有用吗?","authors":"M. Polke","doi":"10.1159/000528778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: No results of controlled trials are available for any of the few treatments offered to children with interstitial lung diseases (chILD). We evaluated hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in a phase 2, prospective, multicentre, 1:1-randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group/crossover trial. HCQ (START arm) or placebo were given for 4 weeks. Then all subjects received HCQ for another 4 weeks. In the STOP arm subjects already taking HCQ were randomized to 12 weeks of HCQ or placebo (= withdrawal of HCQ). Then all subjects stopped treatment and were observed for another 12 weeks. Results: 26 subjects were included in the START arm, 9 in the STOP arm, of these four subjects participated in both arms. The primary endpoint, presence or absence of a response to treatment, assessed as oxygenation (calculated from a change in transcutaneous O2-saturation of ≥ 5%, respiratory rate ≥ 20% or level of respiratory support), did not differ between placebo and HCQ groups. Secondary endpoints including change of O2-saturation ≥ 3%, health related quality of life, pulmonary function and 6-min-walk-test distance, were not different between groups. Finally combining all placebo and all HCQ treatment periods did not identify significant treatment effects. Overall effect sizes were small. HCQ was well tolerated, adverse events were not different between placebo and HCQ. Conclusions: Acknowledging important shortcomings of the study, including a small study population, the treatment duration, lack of outcomes like lung function testing below age of 6 years, the small effect size of HCQ treatment observed requires careful reassessments of prescriptions in everyday practice (EudraCT-Nr.: 2013-003714-40, www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu, registered 02.07.2013). Registration: The study was registered on 2 July 2013 (Eudra-CT Number: 2013-003714-40), whereas the approval by BfArM was received 24.11.2014, followed by the approval by the lead EC of the University Hospital Munich on 20.01.2015. At clinicaltrials.gov the trial was additionally registered on November 8, 2015 (NCT02615938).","PeriodicalId":17887,"journal":{"name":"Kompass Autoimmun","volume":"50 1","pages":"21 - 23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endlich! Eine randomisiert-kontrollierte Phase-2-Studie bei chILD: Ist der Einsatz von Hydroxychloroquin sinnvoll?\",\"authors\":\"M. Polke\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000528778\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: No results of controlled trials are available for any of the few treatments offered to children with interstitial lung diseases (chILD). We evaluated hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in a phase 2, prospective, multicentre, 1:1-randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group/crossover trial. HCQ (START arm) or placebo were given for 4 weeks. Then all subjects received HCQ for another 4 weeks. In the STOP arm subjects already taking HCQ were randomized to 12 weeks of HCQ or placebo (= withdrawal of HCQ). Then all subjects stopped treatment and were observed for another 12 weeks. Results: 26 subjects were included in the START arm, 9 in the STOP arm, of these four subjects participated in both arms. The primary endpoint, presence or absence of a response to treatment, assessed as oxygenation (calculated from a change in transcutaneous O2-saturation of ≥ 5%, respiratory rate ≥ 20% or level of respiratory support), did not differ between placebo and HCQ groups. Secondary endpoints including change of O2-saturation ≥ 3%, health related quality of life, pulmonary function and 6-min-walk-test distance, were not different between groups. Finally combining all placebo and all HCQ treatment periods did not identify significant treatment effects. Overall effect sizes were small. HCQ was well tolerated, adverse events were not different between placebo and HCQ. Conclusions: Acknowledging important shortcomings of the study, including a small study population, the treatment duration, lack of outcomes like lung function testing below age of 6 years, the small effect size of HCQ treatment observed requires careful reassessments of prescriptions in everyday practice (EudraCT-Nr.: 2013-003714-40, www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu, registered 02.07.2013). Registration: The study was registered on 2 July 2013 (Eudra-CT Number: 2013-003714-40), whereas the approval by BfArM was received 24.11.2014, followed by the approval by the lead EC of the University Hospital Munich on 20.01.2015. At clinicaltrials.gov the trial was additionally registered on November 8, 2015 (NCT02615938).\",\"PeriodicalId\":17887,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kompass Autoimmun\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"21 - 23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kompass Autoimmun\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000528778\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kompass Autoimmun","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000528778","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:对于间质性肺疾病(chILD)患儿的几种治疗方法,没有对照试验的结果。我们在一项2期、前瞻性、多中心、1:1随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组/交叉试验中评估了羟氯喹(HCQ)。HCQ (START组)或安慰剂治疗4周。然后所有受试者继续接受HCQ治疗4周。在停止组中,已经服用HCQ的受试者被随机分为12周的HCQ或安慰剂组(=停用HCQ)。然后所有受试者停止治疗,再观察12周。结果:26名受试者被纳入START组,9名受试者被纳入STOP组,这4名受试者同时参加了两个组。主要终点,对治疗是否有反应,评估为氧合(通过经皮o2饱和度≥5%、呼吸率≥20%或呼吸支持水平的变化计算),在安慰剂组和HCQ组之间没有差异。次要终点包括o2饱和度≥3%的变化、健康相关生活质量、肺功能和6 min步行测试距离,两组间无差异。最后,将所有安慰剂和所有HCQ治疗期相结合,没有发现显著的治疗效果。总体效应量很小。HCQ耐受性良好,安慰剂组和HCQ组的不良事件无差异。结论:承认该研究的重要缺陷,包括研究人群小,治疗时间长,缺乏6岁以下肺功能检测等结果,观察到的HCQ治疗效果小,需要在日常实践中仔细重新评估处方(eudrac - nr)。: 2013-003714-40, www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu,注册日期:2013年7月2日)。注册:该研究于2013年7月2日注册(Eudra-CT编号:2013-003714-40),BfArM于2014年11月24日获得批准,随后于2015年1月20日获得慕尼黑大学医院首席EC的批准。在clinicaltrials.gov上,该试验于2015年11月8日注册(NCT02615938)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Endlich! Eine randomisiert-kontrollierte Phase-2-Studie bei chILD: Ist der Einsatz von Hydroxychloroquin sinnvoll?
Background: No results of controlled trials are available for any of the few treatments offered to children with interstitial lung diseases (chILD). We evaluated hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in a phase 2, prospective, multicentre, 1:1-randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group/crossover trial. HCQ (START arm) or placebo were given for 4 weeks. Then all subjects received HCQ for another 4 weeks. In the STOP arm subjects already taking HCQ were randomized to 12 weeks of HCQ or placebo (= withdrawal of HCQ). Then all subjects stopped treatment and were observed for another 12 weeks. Results: 26 subjects were included in the START arm, 9 in the STOP arm, of these four subjects participated in both arms. The primary endpoint, presence or absence of a response to treatment, assessed as oxygenation (calculated from a change in transcutaneous O2-saturation of ≥ 5%, respiratory rate ≥ 20% or level of respiratory support), did not differ between placebo and HCQ groups. Secondary endpoints including change of O2-saturation ≥ 3%, health related quality of life, pulmonary function and 6-min-walk-test distance, were not different between groups. Finally combining all placebo and all HCQ treatment periods did not identify significant treatment effects. Overall effect sizes were small. HCQ was well tolerated, adverse events were not different between placebo and HCQ. Conclusions: Acknowledging important shortcomings of the study, including a small study population, the treatment duration, lack of outcomes like lung function testing below age of 6 years, the small effect size of HCQ treatment observed requires careful reassessments of prescriptions in everyday practice (EudraCT-Nr.: 2013-003714-40, www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu, registered 02.07.2013). Registration: The study was registered on 2 July 2013 (Eudra-CT Number: 2013-003714-40), whereas the approval by BfArM was received 24.11.2014, followed by the approval by the lead EC of the University Hospital Munich on 20.01.2015. At clinicaltrials.gov the trial was additionally registered on November 8, 2015 (NCT02615938).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Morbus Crohn: Vielversprechende Behandlungsoption eines neuen IL-23-Inhibitors auf dem Weg zur Zulassung Moderne Immunologie hat unsere Behandlungsoptionen stark verändert Behandlung der eosinophilen Granulomatose mit Polyangiitis: Ist Benralizumab eine Alternative? Treat hard and early in SSc-ILD: milde ILD ist immer noch ILD Biologische Therapie bei systemischem Lupus erythematodes, Antiphospholipid-Syndrom und Sjögren-Syndrom: evidenz- und praxisbasierte Leitlinien
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1