全髋关节和膝关节置换术后快速活动

B. Dower, K. J. M. Intyre, G. Grobler, M. Nortje
{"title":"全髋关节和膝关节置换术后快速活动","authors":"B. Dower, K. J. M. Intyre, G. Grobler, M. Nortje","doi":"10.17159/2309-8309/2017/V16N2A8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Rapid mobilisation programs, or “fast track” protocols, are aimed at shorter hospital stays. We found a limited local experience with these programs in total hip arthroplasty in South Africa, and decided to introduce a pilot study at our institution. Purpose This pilot study is aimed at the feasibility and safety of a RM program in the private sector setting, as well as a review of the pertinent literature. Methods 40 patients who met inclusion criteria underwent THR and TKR according to a specific protocol. Key aspects of the protocol included: minimum use of opiates, high volume pericapsular local block at time of surgery, no urinary catheter, mobilisation within 6 hrs of surgery and no high care admission. Target Discharge was 3 days. Patients were followed up retrospectively and outcomes included; length of stay, intra- and post-operative complications, subjective patient experience, re-admissions and re-operations. Results 36 patients, (90 %), were discharged by day 3, 4 patients were discharged at day 4. Mean stay 2,8 days, shortest 2 days, and longest 4 days. 3 elderly female patients required catheterization for urinary incontinence, on the first night post surgery. No complications were experienced. The problems that prevented discharge within 3 days were post operative pain and orthostatic hypotension. There were no re-admissions or re-operations. One TKR required manipulation at 6 weeks. 5 patients required changes of dressings at home within one week post surgery. All the patients in this study were extremely satisfied. Conclusion A rapid mobilisation program is relatively easy to implement although extra paramedical staff input is required. The results of this pilot study show that the protocol was effective and safe, as well as showing a significant hospital cost reduction. The obvious saving of costs are encouraging us to implement the protocol on a wider scale. Appendix Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, ligula suspendisse nulla pretium, rhoncus tempor placerat fermentum, enim integer ad vestibulum volutpat. Nisl rhoncus turpis est, vel elit, congue wisi enim nunc ultricies sit, magna tincidunt. Maecenas aliquam maecenas ligula nostra, accumsan taciti. Sociis mauris in integer, a dolor netus non dui aliquet, sagittis felis sodales, dolor sociis mauris, vel eu libero cras. Interdum at. Eget habitasse elementum est, ipsum purus pede porttitor class, ut adipiscing, aliquet sed auctor, imperdiet arcu per diam dapibus libero duis. Enim eros in vel, volutpat nec pellentesque le NO DISCLOSURES","PeriodicalId":15048,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-british Volume","volume":"38 1","pages":"36-36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"RAPID MOBILISATION FOLLOWING TOTAL HIP AND KNEE ARTHROPLASTY\",\"authors\":\"B. Dower, K. J. M. Intyre, G. Grobler, M. Nortje\",\"doi\":\"10.17159/2309-8309/2017/V16N2A8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Rapid mobilisation programs, or “fast track” protocols, are aimed at shorter hospital stays. We found a limited local experience with these programs in total hip arthroplasty in South Africa, and decided to introduce a pilot study at our institution. Purpose This pilot study is aimed at the feasibility and safety of a RM program in the private sector setting, as well as a review of the pertinent literature. Methods 40 patients who met inclusion criteria underwent THR and TKR according to a specific protocol. Key aspects of the protocol included: minimum use of opiates, high volume pericapsular local block at time of surgery, no urinary catheter, mobilisation within 6 hrs of surgery and no high care admission. Target Discharge was 3 days. Patients were followed up retrospectively and outcomes included; length of stay, intra- and post-operative complications, subjective patient experience, re-admissions and re-operations. Results 36 patients, (90 %), were discharged by day 3, 4 patients were discharged at day 4. Mean stay 2,8 days, shortest 2 days, and longest 4 days. 3 elderly female patients required catheterization for urinary incontinence, on the first night post surgery. No complications were experienced. The problems that prevented discharge within 3 days were post operative pain and orthostatic hypotension. There were no re-admissions or re-operations. One TKR required manipulation at 6 weeks. 5 patients required changes of dressings at home within one week post surgery. All the patients in this study were extremely satisfied. Conclusion A rapid mobilisation program is relatively easy to implement although extra paramedical staff input is required. The results of this pilot study show that the protocol was effective and safe, as well as showing a significant hospital cost reduction. The obvious saving of costs are encouraging us to implement the protocol on a wider scale. Appendix Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, ligula suspendisse nulla pretium, rhoncus tempor placerat fermentum, enim integer ad vestibulum volutpat. Nisl rhoncus turpis est, vel elit, congue wisi enim nunc ultricies sit, magna tincidunt. Maecenas aliquam maecenas ligula nostra, accumsan taciti. Sociis mauris in integer, a dolor netus non dui aliquet, sagittis felis sodales, dolor sociis mauris, vel eu libero cras. Interdum at. Eget habitasse elementum est, ipsum purus pede porttitor class, ut adipiscing, aliquet sed auctor, imperdiet arcu per diam dapibus libero duis. Enim eros in vel, volutpat nec pellentesque le NO DISCLOSURES\",\"PeriodicalId\":15048,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-british Volume\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"36-36\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-british Volume\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17159/2309-8309/2017/V16N2A8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-british Volume","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17159/2309-8309/2017/V16N2A8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

快速动员方案或“快速通道”方案旨在缩短住院时间。我们在南非的全髋关节置换术中发现了有限的当地经验,并决定在我们的机构引入一个试点研究。本试点研究旨在探讨RM项目在私营部门的可行性和安全性,并对相关文献进行综述。方法对40例符合入选标准的患者,按特定方案行THR和TKR手术。该方案的关键方面包括:最少使用阿片类药物,手术时大容量囊周局部阻滞,无导尿管,手术后6小时内活动,无高护理住院。目标放电时间为3天。回顾性随访患者并纳入结果;住院时间、术中及术后并发症、患者主观体验、再入院及再手术。结果36例(90%)患者于第3天出院,4例于第4天出院。平均住院时间2、8天,最短2天,最长4天。3例老年女性患者术后第1晚因尿失禁需导尿。无并发症发生。术后3天内妨碍出院的问题是术后疼痛和体位性低血压。没有再入院或再手术。1例TKR需要在6周时进行操作。5例患者术后一周内需在家更换敷料。本次研究的所有患者都非常满意。结论快速动员方案相对容易实施,但需要额外的辅助医务人员投入。这项初步研究的结果表明,该方案是有效和安全的,并显示了医院成本的显著降低。明显节省的费用正鼓励我们在更大范围内执行该议定书。附图:小脑:小脑:小脑:小脑:小脑:小脑:小脑:小脑:前庭:前庭:前庭:前庭:前庭:前庭:前庭:前庭:前庭:前庭:前庭:前庭。我是说,我是说,我是说,我是说,我是说,我是说,我是说,我是说,我是说,我是说,我是说。我是说,我是说,我是说,我是说,我是说,我是说。社会主义是一种整数形式,一种整数形式的社会主义,一种整数形式的社会主义。Interdum。一般情况下,最基本的是,最基本的是,最基本的是,最基本的是,最基本的是,最基本的是,最基本的是,最基本的是,最基本的是,最基本的是。敌人的意志是坚定的,意志是坚定的,意志是坚定的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
RAPID MOBILISATION FOLLOWING TOTAL HIP AND KNEE ARTHROPLASTY
Background Rapid mobilisation programs, or “fast track” protocols, are aimed at shorter hospital stays. We found a limited local experience with these programs in total hip arthroplasty in South Africa, and decided to introduce a pilot study at our institution. Purpose This pilot study is aimed at the feasibility and safety of a RM program in the private sector setting, as well as a review of the pertinent literature. Methods 40 patients who met inclusion criteria underwent THR and TKR according to a specific protocol. Key aspects of the protocol included: minimum use of opiates, high volume pericapsular local block at time of surgery, no urinary catheter, mobilisation within 6 hrs of surgery and no high care admission. Target Discharge was 3 days. Patients were followed up retrospectively and outcomes included; length of stay, intra- and post-operative complications, subjective patient experience, re-admissions and re-operations. Results 36 patients, (90 %), were discharged by day 3, 4 patients were discharged at day 4. Mean stay 2,8 days, shortest 2 days, and longest 4 days. 3 elderly female patients required catheterization for urinary incontinence, on the first night post surgery. No complications were experienced. The problems that prevented discharge within 3 days were post operative pain and orthostatic hypotension. There were no re-admissions or re-operations. One TKR required manipulation at 6 weeks. 5 patients required changes of dressings at home within one week post surgery. All the patients in this study were extremely satisfied. Conclusion A rapid mobilisation program is relatively easy to implement although extra paramedical staff input is required. The results of this pilot study show that the protocol was effective and safe, as well as showing a significant hospital cost reduction. The obvious saving of costs are encouraging us to implement the protocol on a wider scale. Appendix Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, ligula suspendisse nulla pretium, rhoncus tempor placerat fermentum, enim integer ad vestibulum volutpat. Nisl rhoncus turpis est, vel elit, congue wisi enim nunc ultricies sit, magna tincidunt. Maecenas aliquam maecenas ligula nostra, accumsan taciti. Sociis mauris in integer, a dolor netus non dui aliquet, sagittis felis sodales, dolor sociis mauris, vel eu libero cras. Interdum at. Eget habitasse elementum est, ipsum purus pede porttitor class, ut adipiscing, aliquet sed auctor, imperdiet arcu per diam dapibus libero duis. Enim eros in vel, volutpat nec pellentesque le NO DISCLOSURES
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 months
期刊最新文献
Sex Disparities Among Fellowship Program Directors in Orthopaedic Surgery. Osteoarthritis and the Microbiome: Knock, Knock, Anybody Home? Shake, Rattle, and Roll: Is It Time to Bring Sonication into the Operating Room? Sometimes Less Is More! DNA Variation in Spinal Pathologies: Genetics Running Down the Spine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1