不仅仅是购物、城市阁楼和同性恋热潮:性取向人口统计数据如何影响家庭法院

T. Brower
{"title":"不仅仅是购物、城市阁楼和同性恋热潮:性取向人口统计数据如何影响家庭法院","authors":"T. Brower","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1213270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Courts today are deeply involved in matters involving lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgendered persons. Same-sex marriage, custody disputes, conflict with religious claims and other, more routine family law cases all bring sexual orientation minorities into the judicial system as parties, witnesses, lawyers, or jurors. Like sexuality, gender and gender roles have traditionally and significantly influenced these issues. Nevertheless, judges and the legal system often have little factual information about the lesbians and gay men who appear in their courtrooms, instead relying on stereotypes of gay persons. Such reliance fails to see the real people currently present in family courts and likely to appear in the future. The paradigmatic image of the lesbian mother or the adopted child, both radically different from their heterosexual counterparts captures only a slice of lesbian and gay male families. This paper examines recent demographic studies on same-sex couples to explore how sexuality and gender statistics may be used to guide family law doctrine and case outcomes in the 21st century. Since sexual orientation is not uniformly apparent, but varies with individuals and over time and location, the article specifically explores how visibility of minority sexual orientation may affect the demographic data. For example, the movement of lesbians and gay men away from traditional urban enclaves into areas not usually envisioned as gay-friendly may provoke a shift in both population and domestic relations jurisprudence. By examining gender and sexuality empirical studies, family law courts and judges can better see the people and issues present before them - and family law may more accurately reflect the diversity of family structures in modern life.","PeriodicalId":87421,"journal":{"name":"The American University journal of gender, social policy & the law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"It's Not Just Shopping, Urban Lofts, and the Lesbian Gay-By Boom: How Sexual Orientation Demographics Can Inform Family Courts\",\"authors\":\"T. Brower\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.1213270\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Courts today are deeply involved in matters involving lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgendered persons. Same-sex marriage, custody disputes, conflict with religious claims and other, more routine family law cases all bring sexual orientation minorities into the judicial system as parties, witnesses, lawyers, or jurors. Like sexuality, gender and gender roles have traditionally and significantly influenced these issues. Nevertheless, judges and the legal system often have little factual information about the lesbians and gay men who appear in their courtrooms, instead relying on stereotypes of gay persons. Such reliance fails to see the real people currently present in family courts and likely to appear in the future. The paradigmatic image of the lesbian mother or the adopted child, both radically different from their heterosexual counterparts captures only a slice of lesbian and gay male families. This paper examines recent demographic studies on same-sex couples to explore how sexuality and gender statistics may be used to guide family law doctrine and case outcomes in the 21st century. Since sexual orientation is not uniformly apparent, but varies with individuals and over time and location, the article specifically explores how visibility of minority sexual orientation may affect the demographic data. For example, the movement of lesbians and gay men away from traditional urban enclaves into areas not usually envisioned as gay-friendly may provoke a shift in both population and domestic relations jurisprudence. By examining gender and sexuality empirical studies, family law courts and judges can better see the people and issues present before them - and family law may more accurately reflect the diversity of family structures in modern life.\",\"PeriodicalId\":87421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The American University journal of gender, social policy & the law\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The American University journal of gender, social policy & the law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1213270\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American University journal of gender, social policy & the law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1213270","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

今天的法院深深卷入了涉及女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和变性人的事务。同性婚姻、监护权纠纷、与宗教主张的冲突以及其他更常见的家庭法案件都将性取向少数群体作为当事人、证人、律师或陪审员纳入司法系统。与性行为一样,性别和性别角色传统上对这些问题产生了重大影响。然而,法官和司法系统往往对出庭的男女同性恋者知之甚少,而是依赖于对同性恋者的刻板印象。这种依赖没有看到目前出现在家庭法庭上的真实的人,也没有看到将来可能出现的真实的人。女同性恋母亲或被收养的孩子的典型形象,都与异性恋截然不同,只反映了男同性恋和女同性恋家庭的一小部分。本文考察了最近关于同性伴侣的人口统计研究,以探讨如何使用性和性别统计来指导21世纪的家庭法原则和案件结果。由于性取向并不是统一的,而是随着个体、时间和地点的变化而变化的,这篇文章特别探讨了少数性取向的可见性如何影响人口统计数据。例如,男女同性恋者从传统的城市飞地迁移到通常不被认为对同性恋友好的地区,这可能会引发人口和家庭关系法学的转变。通过审查性别和性行为的实证研究,家庭法法庭和法官可以更好地了解他们面前的人和问题,家庭法可以更准确地反映现代生活中家庭结构的多样性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
It's Not Just Shopping, Urban Lofts, and the Lesbian Gay-By Boom: How Sexual Orientation Demographics Can Inform Family Courts
Courts today are deeply involved in matters involving lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgendered persons. Same-sex marriage, custody disputes, conflict with religious claims and other, more routine family law cases all bring sexual orientation minorities into the judicial system as parties, witnesses, lawyers, or jurors. Like sexuality, gender and gender roles have traditionally and significantly influenced these issues. Nevertheless, judges and the legal system often have little factual information about the lesbians and gay men who appear in their courtrooms, instead relying on stereotypes of gay persons. Such reliance fails to see the real people currently present in family courts and likely to appear in the future. The paradigmatic image of the lesbian mother or the adopted child, both radically different from their heterosexual counterparts captures only a slice of lesbian and gay male families. This paper examines recent demographic studies on same-sex couples to explore how sexuality and gender statistics may be used to guide family law doctrine and case outcomes in the 21st century. Since sexual orientation is not uniformly apparent, but varies with individuals and over time and location, the article specifically explores how visibility of minority sexual orientation may affect the demographic data. For example, the movement of lesbians and gay men away from traditional urban enclaves into areas not usually envisioned as gay-friendly may provoke a shift in both population and domestic relations jurisprudence. By examining gender and sexuality empirical studies, family law courts and judges can better see the people and issues present before them - and family law may more accurately reflect the diversity of family structures in modern life.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Confining Cultural Expression: How the Historical Principles Behind Modern Copyright Law Perpetuate Cultural Exclusion 'Lifting as We Climb': The American Council on Human Rights and the Quest for Civil Rights Disparate Impact and Pregnancy: Title VII's Other Accommodation Requirement The 'Pitiless Double Abuse' of Battered Mothers The Sky Didn't Fall: The Meaning and Legal Effects of the North Carolina Marriage Amendment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1