两个68年代的故事:法国和意大利的“无聊政治”

Q1 Social Sciences Cultural Politics Pub Date : 2019-11-01 DOI:10.1215/17432197-7725437
Michael E. Gardiner
{"title":"两个68年代的故事:法国和意大利的“无聊政治”","authors":"Michael E. Gardiner","doi":"10.1215/17432197-7725437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:In The Imagination of the New Left: A Global Analysis of 1968, Katsiaficas suggests the first genuine revolution against \"boredom\"—a rejection of social conformity, stultifying work, and facile consumerism—occurred in Paris during May '68. Yet, this event was only the most spectacular manifestation of a global conflagration. One salient example is the \"May '68 in slow motion\" occurring in Italy over the period 1968–78. Both the French and Italian events spawned their own politico-theoretical legacies that reverberate to this day, especially with regard to the \"politics of boredom\"—the former represented here by Debord's situationism, and the latter by Negri's autonomism. Situationism is rooted in Hegelian Marxism and the concept of alienation, and sees boredom as a mode of subjective disaffection stemming from the capitalistic repression of \"authentic\" human qualities. By contrast, Negri eschews such tropes of alienation and dialectics, focuses more on \"post-Fordist\" conditions of production/consumption, and, taking his cue from the \"ontological materialism\" of nineteenth-century Italian poet and essayist Leopardi, views boredom in more complex and multifaceted terms. Accordingly, the present article concentrates on the different conditions that spawned the respective legacies of '68 in France versus Italy as it relates to the politics of boredom.","PeriodicalId":35197,"journal":{"name":"Cultural Politics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Tale of Two '68s: The \\\"Politics of Boredom\\\" in France and Italy\",\"authors\":\"Michael E. Gardiner\",\"doi\":\"10.1215/17432197-7725437\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:In The Imagination of the New Left: A Global Analysis of 1968, Katsiaficas suggests the first genuine revolution against \\\"boredom\\\"—a rejection of social conformity, stultifying work, and facile consumerism—occurred in Paris during May '68. Yet, this event was only the most spectacular manifestation of a global conflagration. One salient example is the \\\"May '68 in slow motion\\\" occurring in Italy over the period 1968–78. Both the French and Italian events spawned their own politico-theoretical legacies that reverberate to this day, especially with regard to the \\\"politics of boredom\\\"—the former represented here by Debord's situationism, and the latter by Negri's autonomism. Situationism is rooted in Hegelian Marxism and the concept of alienation, and sees boredom as a mode of subjective disaffection stemming from the capitalistic repression of \\\"authentic\\\" human qualities. By contrast, Negri eschews such tropes of alienation and dialectics, focuses more on \\\"post-Fordist\\\" conditions of production/consumption, and, taking his cue from the \\\"ontological materialism\\\" of nineteenth-century Italian poet and essayist Leopardi, views boredom in more complex and multifaceted terms. Accordingly, the present article concentrates on the different conditions that spawned the respective legacies of '68 in France versus Italy as it relates to the politics of boredom.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35197,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cultural Politics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cultural Politics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1215/17432197-7725437\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultural Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/17432197-7725437","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:在《新左派的想象:1968年的全球分析》一书中,Katsiaficas提出了第一次反对“无聊”的真正革命,即对社会顺从、乏味工作和肤浅消费的拒绝,发生在1968年5月的巴黎。然而,这一事件只是全球大火最壮观的表现。一个突出的例子是1968年至1978年期间发生在意大利的“慢动作的1968年5月”。法国和意大利的事件都产生了自己的政治理论遗产,这些遗产至今仍在回响,特别是关于“无聊的政治”——前者在这里由德博的情境主义代表,后者由内格里的自治主义代表。情境主义植根于黑格尔的马克思主义和异化的概念,认为无聊是一种主观不满的模式,源于资本主义对“真实的”人类品质的压抑。相比之下,内格里避开了这种异化和辩证法的比喻,更多地关注“后福特主义”的生产/消费条件,并从19世纪意大利诗人和散文家利奥帕尔迪的“本体论唯物主义”中得到启示,以更复杂和多方面的方式看待无聊。因此,本文将集中讨论产生1968年法国和意大利各自政治遗产的不同条件,因为这与无聊政治有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Tale of Two '68s: The "Politics of Boredom" in France and Italy
Abstract:In The Imagination of the New Left: A Global Analysis of 1968, Katsiaficas suggests the first genuine revolution against "boredom"—a rejection of social conformity, stultifying work, and facile consumerism—occurred in Paris during May '68. Yet, this event was only the most spectacular manifestation of a global conflagration. One salient example is the "May '68 in slow motion" occurring in Italy over the period 1968–78. Both the French and Italian events spawned their own politico-theoretical legacies that reverberate to this day, especially with regard to the "politics of boredom"—the former represented here by Debord's situationism, and the latter by Negri's autonomism. Situationism is rooted in Hegelian Marxism and the concept of alienation, and sees boredom as a mode of subjective disaffection stemming from the capitalistic repression of "authentic" human qualities. By contrast, Negri eschews such tropes of alienation and dialectics, focuses more on "post-Fordist" conditions of production/consumption, and, taking his cue from the "ontological materialism" of nineteenth-century Italian poet and essayist Leopardi, views boredom in more complex and multifaceted terms. Accordingly, the present article concentrates on the different conditions that spawned the respective legacies of '68 in France versus Italy as it relates to the politics of boredom.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cultural Politics
Cultural Politics Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Cultural Politics is an international, refereed journal that explores the global character and effects of contemporary culture and politics. Cultural Politics explores precisely what is cultural about politics and what is political about culture. Publishing across the arts, humanities, and social sciences, the journal welcomes articles from different political positions, cultural approaches, and geographical locations. Cultural Politics publishes work that analyzes how cultural identities, agencies and actors, political issues and conflicts, and global media are linked, characterized, examined, and resolved. In so doing, the journal supports the innovative study of established, embryonic, marginalized, or unexplored regions of cultural politics. Cultural Politics, while embodying the interdisciplinary coverage and discursive critical spirit of contemporary cultural studies, emphasizes how cultural theories and practices intersect with and elucidate analyses of political power. The journal invites articles on representation and visual culture; modernism and postmodernism; media, film, and communications; popular and elite art forms; the politics of production and consumption; language; ethics and religion; desire and psychoanalysis; art and aesthetics; the culture industry; technologies; academics and the academy; cities, architecture, and the spatial; global capitalism; Marxism; value and ideology; the military, weaponry, and war; power, authority, and institutions; global governance and democracy; political parties and social movements; human rights; community and cosmopolitanism; transnational activism and change; the global public sphere; the body; identity and performance; heterosexual, transsexual, lesbian, and gay sexualities; race, blackness, whiteness, and ethnicity; the social inequalities of the global and the local; patriarchy, feminism, and gender studies; postcolonialism; and political activism.
期刊最新文献
Meditations on Writing Hell Transitional Justice beyond the Human Evocations of Multispecies Justice Tree Stories Ocean Justice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1