基于SPIN模型检验的文件系统鲁棒性综合评价

IF 1.5 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING Software Testing Verification & Reliability Pub Date : 2022-07-20 DOI:10.1002/stvr.1828
Jingcheng Yuan, Toshiaki Aoki, Xiaoyun Guo
{"title":"基于SPIN模型检验的文件系统鲁棒性综合评价","authors":"Jingcheng Yuan, Toshiaki Aoki, Xiaoyun Guo","doi":"10.1002/stvr.1828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In existing computer systems, file systems are indispensable for organizing user data and system codes. However, several studies have reported certain file system errors that cause significant data loss or system crashes. Most of these errors are due to external failures, such as an unexpected power outage. However, comprehensively evaluating file system robustness to detect these errors is challenging. The various types of file systems use different data structures and algorithms for various applications. Moreover, file system errors may be triggered by an unpredictable external condition. In addition, a file system works in an operating system's kernel layer as a passive module and runs in a multi‐thread mode, which makes file system testing time‐intensive. Furthermore, the large number of states in file systems leads to greedy checking, which results in a state explosion. In this study, we comprehensively evaluated the robustness expected in multiple properties of file systems using a model checking approach. The evaluation covered the majority of the mainstream file system types and included both single‐thread and multi‐thread modes. We developed Promela models that abstracted the real file systems and subsequently checked them using a SPIN model checker. Our model was optimized to avoid state explosion during model checking. Using the model checking, we successfully detected corner‐case errors during an unexpected power outage. By analysing counterexamples generated by model checking, we determined an improved file system model capable of preventing errors in most mainstream file system types. Finally, we rechecked the improved file system model and verified the absence of all critical errors.","PeriodicalId":49506,"journal":{"name":"Software Testing Verification & Reliability","volume":"151 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comprehensive evaluation of file systems robustness with SPIN model checking\",\"authors\":\"Jingcheng Yuan, Toshiaki Aoki, Xiaoyun Guo\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/stvr.1828\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In existing computer systems, file systems are indispensable for organizing user data and system codes. However, several studies have reported certain file system errors that cause significant data loss or system crashes. Most of these errors are due to external failures, such as an unexpected power outage. However, comprehensively evaluating file system robustness to detect these errors is challenging. The various types of file systems use different data structures and algorithms for various applications. Moreover, file system errors may be triggered by an unpredictable external condition. In addition, a file system works in an operating system's kernel layer as a passive module and runs in a multi‐thread mode, which makes file system testing time‐intensive. Furthermore, the large number of states in file systems leads to greedy checking, which results in a state explosion. In this study, we comprehensively evaluated the robustness expected in multiple properties of file systems using a model checking approach. The evaluation covered the majority of the mainstream file system types and included both single‐thread and multi‐thread modes. We developed Promela models that abstracted the real file systems and subsequently checked them using a SPIN model checker. Our model was optimized to avoid state explosion during model checking. Using the model checking, we successfully detected corner‐case errors during an unexpected power outage. By analysing counterexamples generated by model checking, we determined an improved file system model capable of preventing errors in most mainstream file system types. Finally, we rechecked the improved file system model and verified the absence of all critical errors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49506,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Software Testing Verification & Reliability\",\"volume\":\"151 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Software Testing Verification & Reliability\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/stvr.1828\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Software Testing Verification & Reliability","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/stvr.1828","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在现有的计算机系统中,文件系统对于组织用户数据和系统代码是必不可少的。然而,一些研究报告了某些文件系统错误会导致严重的数据丢失或系统崩溃。这些错误大多是由于外部故障造成的,比如意外断电。然而,全面评估文件系统健壮性以检测这些错误是具有挑战性的。不同类型的文件系统为不同的应用程序使用不同的数据结构和算法。此外,文件系统错误可能由不可预测的外部条件触发。此外,文件系统作为一个被动模块在操作系统的内核层中工作,并以多线程模式运行,这使得文件系统测试非常耗时。此外,文件系统中的大量状态会导致贪婪检查,从而导致状态爆炸。在本研究中,我们使用模型检查方法全面评估了文件系统多个属性的鲁棒性。评估涵盖了大多数主流文件系统类型,包括单线程和多线程模式。我们开发了Promela模型来抽象真实的文件系统,并随后使用SPIN模型检查器检查它们。对模型进行了优化,避免了模型校验过程中的状态爆炸。使用模型检查,我们成功地检测了意外停电期间的角落案例错误。通过分析模型检查产生的反例,我们确定了一个改进的文件系统模型,能够防止大多数主流文件系统类型的错误。最后,我们重新检查了改进后的文件系统模型,并验证了不存在所有关键错误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comprehensive evaluation of file systems robustness with SPIN model checking
In existing computer systems, file systems are indispensable for organizing user data and system codes. However, several studies have reported certain file system errors that cause significant data loss or system crashes. Most of these errors are due to external failures, such as an unexpected power outage. However, comprehensively evaluating file system robustness to detect these errors is challenging. The various types of file systems use different data structures and algorithms for various applications. Moreover, file system errors may be triggered by an unpredictable external condition. In addition, a file system works in an operating system's kernel layer as a passive module and runs in a multi‐thread mode, which makes file system testing time‐intensive. Furthermore, the large number of states in file systems leads to greedy checking, which results in a state explosion. In this study, we comprehensively evaluated the robustness expected in multiple properties of file systems using a model checking approach. The evaluation covered the majority of the mainstream file system types and included both single‐thread and multi‐thread modes. We developed Promela models that abstracted the real file systems and subsequently checked them using a SPIN model checker. Our model was optimized to avoid state explosion during model checking. Using the model checking, we successfully detected corner‐case errors during an unexpected power outage. By analysing counterexamples generated by model checking, we determined an improved file system model capable of preventing errors in most mainstream file system types. Finally, we rechecked the improved file system model and verified the absence of all critical errors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Software Testing Verification & Reliability
Software Testing Verification & Reliability 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal is the premier outlet for research results on the subjects of testing, verification and reliability. Readers will find useful research on issues pertaining to building better software and evaluating it. The journal is unique in its emphasis on theoretical foundations and applications to real-world software development. The balance of theory, empirical work, and practical applications provide readers with better techniques for testing, verifying and improving the reliability of software. The journal targets researchers, practitioners, educators and students that have a vested interest in results generated by high-quality testing, verification and reliability modeling and evaluation of software. Topics of special interest include, but are not limited to: -New criteria for software testing and verification -Application of existing software testing and verification techniques to new types of software, including web applications, web services, embedded software, aspect-oriented software, and software architectures -Model based testing -Formal verification techniques such as model-checking -Comparison of testing and verification techniques -Measurement of and metrics for testing, verification and reliability -Industrial experience with cutting edge techniques -Descriptions and evaluations of commercial and open-source software testing tools -Reliability modeling, measurement and application -Testing and verification of software security -Automated test data generation -Process issues and methods -Non-functional testing
期刊最新文献
Model‐based testing, test case prioritization and testing of virtual reality applications In vivo testing and integration of proving and testing Mutation testing optimisations using the Clang front‐end Semantic‐aware two‐phase test case prioritization for continuous integration Exploiting deep reinforcement learning and metamorphic testing to automatically test virtual reality applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1