《将军们的内战:他们的回忆录今天对我们的启示》作者:斯蒂芬·库什曼

IF 0.2 3区 历史学 Q2 HISTORY CIVIL WAR HISTORY Pub Date : 2022-10-21 DOI:10.1353/cwh.2022.0043
T. Williams
{"title":"《将军们的内战:他们的回忆录今天对我们的启示》作者:斯蒂芬·库什曼","authors":"T. Williams","doi":"10.1353/cwh.2022.0043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Thomas and Sharon Kennedy-Nolle, as well as a forthcoming collection examining the writing of Albion W. Tourgée (edited by Sandra Gustafson and Robert Levine), show that though Reconstruction-era authors turned to imaginative works as their weapons, they were no less invested in discerning how to get the reading public to accept as true information about conditions in the South. In a moving epilogue, Blair extends his exploration into the latter decades of the nineteenth century with an exploration of Ida B. Wells’s anti-lynching activism. Like the Freedmen’s Bureau reporting, the work of Wells and other African American activists drew on data collection techniques to center the perspectives of Black citizens and influence policy; however, as Blair points out, in contrast to the efforts of the 1860s, “the anti-lynching campaign lacked the backing of the federal government” (135). Further, the supposedly empirically motivated scholarship on Reconstruction that was emerging in the same late nineteenth-century period repeated the erasure of African American perspectives and dismissed the data collected by the Freedmen’s Bureau just as partisans of the early Reconstruction years did. In beautifully written closing paragraphs, Blair shows how present-day organizations like the Equal Justice Initiative redress these abiding distortions via the National Memorial for Peace and Justice, a lynching monument. “It is significant to have a record of wrongdoing,” Blair concludes, because such a record leaves “the possibility of an accounting” (139). As the 2022 Zinn Education Project National Report on the Teaching of Reconstruction discloses, attending to the records of Reconstruction and accounting for their impact is necessary—and very much unfinished—work. The Record of Murders and Outrages contributes to that effort powerfully and should find a ready place on course syllabi as well as on the bookshelves of scholars and any reader interested in Reconstruction. Gregory Laski US Air Force Academy","PeriodicalId":43056,"journal":{"name":"CIVIL WAR HISTORY","volume":"1 1","pages":"436 - 439"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Generals’ Civil War: What Their Memoirs Can Teach Us Today by Stephen Cushman (review)\",\"authors\":\"T. Williams\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/cwh.2022.0043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Thomas and Sharon Kennedy-Nolle, as well as a forthcoming collection examining the writing of Albion W. Tourgée (edited by Sandra Gustafson and Robert Levine), show that though Reconstruction-era authors turned to imaginative works as their weapons, they were no less invested in discerning how to get the reading public to accept as true information about conditions in the South. In a moving epilogue, Blair extends his exploration into the latter decades of the nineteenth century with an exploration of Ida B. Wells’s anti-lynching activism. Like the Freedmen’s Bureau reporting, the work of Wells and other African American activists drew on data collection techniques to center the perspectives of Black citizens and influence policy; however, as Blair points out, in contrast to the efforts of the 1860s, “the anti-lynching campaign lacked the backing of the federal government” (135). Further, the supposedly empirically motivated scholarship on Reconstruction that was emerging in the same late nineteenth-century period repeated the erasure of African American perspectives and dismissed the data collected by the Freedmen’s Bureau just as partisans of the early Reconstruction years did. In beautifully written closing paragraphs, Blair shows how present-day organizations like the Equal Justice Initiative redress these abiding distortions via the National Memorial for Peace and Justice, a lynching monument. “It is significant to have a record of wrongdoing,” Blair concludes, because such a record leaves “the possibility of an accounting” (139). As the 2022 Zinn Education Project National Report on the Teaching of Reconstruction discloses, attending to the records of Reconstruction and accounting for their impact is necessary—and very much unfinished—work. The Record of Murders and Outrages contributes to that effort powerfully and should find a ready place on course syllabi as well as on the bookshelves of scholars and any reader interested in Reconstruction. Gregory Laski US Air Force Academy\",\"PeriodicalId\":43056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CIVIL WAR HISTORY\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"436 - 439\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CIVIL WAR HISTORY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/cwh.2022.0043\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CIVIL WAR HISTORY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cwh.2022.0043","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

托马斯和莎伦·肯尼迪-诺勒,以及即将出版的一本关于阿尔比恩·w·图尔格萨梅写作的文集(由桑德拉·古斯塔夫森和罗伯特·莱文编辑)都表明,尽管重建时期的作家们把富有想象力的作品作为武器,但他们在如何让读者接受关于南方状况的真实信息方面也投入了同样多的精力。在感人的结语中,布莱尔将他的探索延伸到了19世纪后几十年,探讨了艾达·b·威尔斯(Ida B. Wells)反对私刑的激进主义。就像自由民局的报告一样,威尔斯和其他非裔美国人活动人士的工作利用数据收集技术来集中黑人公民的观点并影响政策;然而,正如布莱尔指出的,与19世纪60年代的努力相比,“反私刑运动缺乏联邦政府的支持”(135页)。此外,在19世纪晚期出现的所谓的以经验为动机的重建学术,重复了对非裔美国人观点的抹除,并驳斥了自由民局收集的数据,就像重建早期的游击队员所做的那样。在文笔优美的结束语中,布莱尔展示了像“平等司法倡议”这样的现代组织是如何通过私刑纪念碑“国家和平与正义纪念碑”来纠正这些长期存在的扭曲现象的。布莱尔总结道:“有不当行为的记录是很重要的”,因为这样的记录留下了“会计核算的可能性”(139)。正如《2022年津恩教育项目全国重建教学报告》所披露的那样,关注重建的记录并考虑其影响是必要的,也是尚未完成的工作。《谋杀与暴行记录》有力地促进了这一努力,应该在课程大纲以及学者和任何对重建感兴趣的读者的书架上找到一个现成的位置。格雷戈里·拉斯基美国空军学院
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Generals’ Civil War: What Their Memoirs Can Teach Us Today by Stephen Cushman (review)
Thomas and Sharon Kennedy-Nolle, as well as a forthcoming collection examining the writing of Albion W. Tourgée (edited by Sandra Gustafson and Robert Levine), show that though Reconstruction-era authors turned to imaginative works as their weapons, they were no less invested in discerning how to get the reading public to accept as true information about conditions in the South. In a moving epilogue, Blair extends his exploration into the latter decades of the nineteenth century with an exploration of Ida B. Wells’s anti-lynching activism. Like the Freedmen’s Bureau reporting, the work of Wells and other African American activists drew on data collection techniques to center the perspectives of Black citizens and influence policy; however, as Blair points out, in contrast to the efforts of the 1860s, “the anti-lynching campaign lacked the backing of the federal government” (135). Further, the supposedly empirically motivated scholarship on Reconstruction that was emerging in the same late nineteenth-century period repeated the erasure of African American perspectives and dismissed the data collected by the Freedmen’s Bureau just as partisans of the early Reconstruction years did. In beautifully written closing paragraphs, Blair shows how present-day organizations like the Equal Justice Initiative redress these abiding distortions via the National Memorial for Peace and Justice, a lynching monument. “It is significant to have a record of wrongdoing,” Blair concludes, because such a record leaves “the possibility of an accounting” (139). As the 2022 Zinn Education Project National Report on the Teaching of Reconstruction discloses, attending to the records of Reconstruction and accounting for their impact is necessary—and very much unfinished—work. The Record of Murders and Outrages contributes to that effort powerfully and should find a ready place on course syllabi as well as on the bookshelves of scholars and any reader interested in Reconstruction. Gregory Laski US Air Force Academy
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Civil War History is the foremost scholarly journal of the sectional conflict in the United States, focusing on social, cultural, economic, political, and military issues from antebellum America through Reconstruction. Articles have featured research on slavery, abolitionism, women and war, Abraham Lincoln, fiction, national identity, and various aspects of the Northern and Southern military. Published quarterly in March, June, September, and December.
期刊最新文献
Contesting "the Insatiable Maw of Capital": Mine Workers' Struggles in the Civil War Era Contributors The Open-Shop Movement and the Long Shadow of Slavery, the Civil War, and Reconstruction Book Review Essay: After War and Emancipation, an Irrepressible Conflict "We Can Take Care of Ourselves Now": Establishing Independent Black Labor and Industry in Postwar Yorktown, Virginia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1