叙述现代战争:技术与战争文学美学

IF 0.1 3区 文学 N/A LITERATURE, SLAVIC Primerjalna Knjizevnost Pub Date : 2020-05-22 DOI:10.3986/PKN.V43.I1.08
Martin Löschnigg
{"title":"叙述现代战争:技术与战争文学美学","authors":"Martin Löschnigg","doi":"10.3986/PKN.V43.I1.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay analyses how since the early twentieth century war novels and memoirs have reflected the challenges which modern warfare poses to narrative. Mechanized warfare, I argue, resists the narrative encoding of experience, creating a crisis of narrative that is frequently made explicit in the assertion, on the part of novelists and memoirists, that the actual experience of combat cannot be narrated. Thus, for instance, the nature of warfare on the Western Front 1914–1918, characterized by the fragmentation of vision in the trenches and the exposure of soldiers to a continuous sequence of acoustic shocks, had a disruptive effect on perceptions of time and space, and consequently on the rendering of the chronotope in narrative accounts of the fighting. Since then, modern military technology has increasingly generated a sense that wars have acquired a dynamic of their own. The “cinematic” nature of technological warfare and the resulting loss of individual agency have suspended the order-creating and meaning-creating function of narrative, leading, in extremis, to the representational impasse emphasized by trauma theory. In my discussion of selected war writings, I shall show how the “cognitive narratology” of modern warfare can be applied to the analysis of aesthetic manifestations in war literature and the “crisis of language” underlying (literary) modernity and postmodernity.","PeriodicalId":52032,"journal":{"name":"Primerjalna Knjizevnost","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Narrating Modern War: Technology and the Aesthetics of War Literature\",\"authors\":\"Martin Löschnigg\",\"doi\":\"10.3986/PKN.V43.I1.08\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This essay analyses how since the early twentieth century war novels and memoirs have reflected the challenges which modern warfare poses to narrative. Mechanized warfare, I argue, resists the narrative encoding of experience, creating a crisis of narrative that is frequently made explicit in the assertion, on the part of novelists and memoirists, that the actual experience of combat cannot be narrated. Thus, for instance, the nature of warfare on the Western Front 1914–1918, characterized by the fragmentation of vision in the trenches and the exposure of soldiers to a continuous sequence of acoustic shocks, had a disruptive effect on perceptions of time and space, and consequently on the rendering of the chronotope in narrative accounts of the fighting. Since then, modern military technology has increasingly generated a sense that wars have acquired a dynamic of their own. The “cinematic” nature of technological warfare and the resulting loss of individual agency have suspended the order-creating and meaning-creating function of narrative, leading, in extremis, to the representational impasse emphasized by trauma theory. In my discussion of selected war writings, I shall show how the “cognitive narratology” of modern warfare can be applied to the analysis of aesthetic manifestations in war literature and the “crisis of language” underlying (literary) modernity and postmodernity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52032,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Primerjalna Knjizevnost\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Primerjalna Knjizevnost\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3986/PKN.V43.I1.08\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"N/A\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, SLAVIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primerjalna Knjizevnost","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3986/PKN.V43.I1.08","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"LITERATURE, SLAVIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分析了自20世纪初以来,战争小说和回忆录如何反映了现代战争对叙事的挑战。我认为,机械化战争抵制了对经验的叙事编码,造成了一种叙事危机,这种危机在小说家和回忆录作者的断言中经常被明确地表达出来,即实际的战斗经验无法被叙述。因此,例如,1914-1918年西线战争的本质,以战壕中的视觉碎片和士兵暴露在连续的声波冲击中为特征,对时间和空间的感知产生了破坏性影响,从而对战斗叙事中计时表的呈现产生了破坏性影响。从那以后,现代军事技术越来越让人觉得战争已经获得了自己的动力。技术战争的“电影”性质以及由此导致的个人能动性的丧失,暂停了叙事的秩序创造和意义创造功能,在极端情况下,导致了创伤理论所强调的再现性僵局。在我对选定的战争作品的讨论中,我将展示如何将现代战争的“认知叙事学”应用于战争文学中的审美表现和(文学)现代性和后现代背后的“语言危机”的分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Narrating Modern War: Technology and the Aesthetics of War Literature
This essay analyses how since the early twentieth century war novels and memoirs have reflected the challenges which modern warfare poses to narrative. Mechanized warfare, I argue, resists the narrative encoding of experience, creating a crisis of narrative that is frequently made explicit in the assertion, on the part of novelists and memoirists, that the actual experience of combat cannot be narrated. Thus, for instance, the nature of warfare on the Western Front 1914–1918, characterized by the fragmentation of vision in the trenches and the exposure of soldiers to a continuous sequence of acoustic shocks, had a disruptive effect on perceptions of time and space, and consequently on the rendering of the chronotope in narrative accounts of the fighting. Since then, modern military technology has increasingly generated a sense that wars have acquired a dynamic of their own. The “cinematic” nature of technological warfare and the resulting loss of individual agency have suspended the order-creating and meaning-creating function of narrative, leading, in extremis, to the representational impasse emphasized by trauma theory. In my discussion of selected war writings, I shall show how the “cognitive narratology” of modern warfare can be applied to the analysis of aesthetic manifestations in war literature and the “crisis of language” underlying (literary) modernity and postmodernity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Primerjalna Knjizevnost
Primerjalna Knjizevnost LITERATURE, SLAVIC-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
Moč odsotnega: eluzivnost resničnosti v dveh Antigonah »Nič drugega kot nič«: negativna teopolitika Sofoklove Antigone O veličini in dostojanstvu žrtve: antropološki nauk Sofoklove Antigone Svetovna primerjalna književnost The Concretization of the Literary Work of Art: Elements for a Comparison between Roman Ingarden and Wolfgang Iser
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1