主要征税权的辩护

IF 0.9 Q2 LAW EJournal of Tax Research Pub Date : 2020-06-01 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.3646646
Noam Noked
{"title":"主要征税权的辩护","authors":"Noam Noked","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3646646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The OECD’s Global Anti-Tax Erosion (GloBE) proposal develops rules providing that countries can tax income where other countries do not exercise their primary taxing rights over that income. What can affected countries with primary taxing rights do in response? One option is to let other countries receive the taxes they choose not to collect. This means that they will suffer the economic harms of taxation without receiving the tax revenues. Another option is to increase their taxes so the primary taxing rights will be ‘fully’ exercised. However, this option might not be desirable or feasible for various reasons, including the broader implications for domestic taxpayers. \n \nThis Article proposes a third option: introducing a new defensive tax which would apply where income subject to the relevant country’s primary taxing rights would be taxed in another country in the absence of this defensive tax. The result would be that the country with the primary taxing rights would collect the tax revenues. This tax would not materially affect the multinational enterprise’s overall tax liability and incentives or create much additional complexity. This tax is fair at the international level as it allocates the tax revenues to the country with the primary taxing rights. Countries that may be adversely affected by the recent international tax developments should consider adopting this tax to defend their primary taxing rights.","PeriodicalId":54058,"journal":{"name":"EJournal of Tax Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Defense of Primary Taxing Rights\",\"authors\":\"Noam Noked\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3646646\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The OECD’s Global Anti-Tax Erosion (GloBE) proposal develops rules providing that countries can tax income where other countries do not exercise their primary taxing rights over that income. What can affected countries with primary taxing rights do in response? One option is to let other countries receive the taxes they choose not to collect. This means that they will suffer the economic harms of taxation without receiving the tax revenues. Another option is to increase their taxes so the primary taxing rights will be ‘fully’ exercised. However, this option might not be desirable or feasible for various reasons, including the broader implications for domestic taxpayers. \\n \\nThis Article proposes a third option: introducing a new defensive tax which would apply where income subject to the relevant country’s primary taxing rights would be taxed in another country in the absence of this defensive tax. The result would be that the country with the primary taxing rights would collect the tax revenues. This tax would not materially affect the multinational enterprise’s overall tax liability and incentives or create much additional complexity. This tax is fair at the international level as it allocates the tax revenues to the country with the primary taxing rights. Countries that may be adversely affected by the recent international tax developments should consider adopting this tax to defend their primary taxing rights.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54058,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EJournal of Tax Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EJournal of Tax Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3646646\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJournal of Tax Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3646646","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

经合组织的全球反税收侵蚀(GloBE)提案制定了规则,规定各国可以对其他国家未对该收入行使主要征税权的收入征税。拥有主要征税权的受影响国家可以采取什么应对措施?一种选择是让其他国家接受他们选择不征收的税收。这意味着他们将在没有税收收入的情况下遭受税收的经济伤害。另一种选择是增加他们的税收,以便“充分”行使主要征税权。但是,由于各种原因,包括对国内纳税人的广泛影响,这种选择可能不可取或不可行。本文提出了第三种选择:引入一种新的防御性税收,适用于在没有这种防御性税收的情况下,受相关国家主要征税权约束的收入将在另一个国家征税的情况。结果将是,拥有主要征税权的国家将收取税收收入。这种税不会对跨国企业的总体纳税义务和激励措施产生重大影响,也不会造成更多的复杂性。这种税在国际层面上是公平的,因为它将税收收入分配给具有主要征税权的国家。可能受到最近国际税收发展不利影响的国家应考虑采用这种税来捍卫其主要征税权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Defense of Primary Taxing Rights
The OECD’s Global Anti-Tax Erosion (GloBE) proposal develops rules providing that countries can tax income where other countries do not exercise their primary taxing rights over that income. What can affected countries with primary taxing rights do in response? One option is to let other countries receive the taxes they choose not to collect. This means that they will suffer the economic harms of taxation without receiving the tax revenues. Another option is to increase their taxes so the primary taxing rights will be ‘fully’ exercised. However, this option might not be desirable or feasible for various reasons, including the broader implications for domestic taxpayers. This Article proposes a third option: introducing a new defensive tax which would apply where income subject to the relevant country’s primary taxing rights would be taxed in another country in the absence of this defensive tax. The result would be that the country with the primary taxing rights would collect the tax revenues. This tax would not materially affect the multinational enterprise’s overall tax liability and incentives or create much additional complexity. This tax is fair at the international level as it allocates the tax revenues to the country with the primary taxing rights. Countries that may be adversely affected by the recent international tax developments should consider adopting this tax to defend their primary taxing rights.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Democracy Avoidance in Tax Lawmaking Recent Administrative and Judicial Developments in IRS Appeals Policy Forum: Promoting Tax Compliance by Regulating the Digital Economy - Quebec's Uber Initiative Supporting Small Businesses in Place Thinking Like a Source State in a Digital Economy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1