以银行协议中第三方拥有的土地权利为担保发放抵押贷款

Jurnal IUS Pub Date : 2022-08-23 DOI:10.29303/ius.v10i2.1112
Cahya Khaerani, Budi Santoso, Hanif Nurwidhiyanti
{"title":"以银行协议中第三方拥有的土地权利为担保发放抵押贷款","authors":"Cahya Khaerani, Budi Santoso, Hanif Nurwidhiyanti","doi":"10.29303/ius.v10i2.1112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to analyze the process of implementing an agreement between a bank and a third party as a collateral owner/which does not belong directly to the debtor, and analyze the legal protection for the owner of the object of mortgage rights pledged by the debtor. The method of approach used in this research is the juridical empirical approaching method. In the implementation of the agreement between the Bank and the collateral owner third party, it is carried out through the Mortgage Rights mechanism. In the event of default by the debtor. Then, the creditor (bank) can still execute the object of collateral pledged by the debtor in accordance with applicable regulations. Second, the UUHT does not provide enough protection to the collateral owner/third party, considering that the third party/collateral owner is not the direct debtor in the credit agreement. In addition, between the third party and the creditor (Bank) also do not have a direct legal relationship, because the third party only has a direct legal relationship with the debtor. So that the third party will only get legal protection from the debtor in accordance with the agreement made with the third party.","PeriodicalId":34628,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal IUS","volume":"70 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Granting of Mortgage Loans With Guarantees of Land Right Owned by Third Parties in Banking Agreements\",\"authors\":\"Cahya Khaerani, Budi Santoso, Hanif Nurwidhiyanti\",\"doi\":\"10.29303/ius.v10i2.1112\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to analyze the process of implementing an agreement between a bank and a third party as a collateral owner/which does not belong directly to the debtor, and analyze the legal protection for the owner of the object of mortgage rights pledged by the debtor. The method of approach used in this research is the juridical empirical approaching method. In the implementation of the agreement between the Bank and the collateral owner third party, it is carried out through the Mortgage Rights mechanism. In the event of default by the debtor. Then, the creditor (bank) can still execute the object of collateral pledged by the debtor in accordance with applicable regulations. Second, the UUHT does not provide enough protection to the collateral owner/third party, considering that the third party/collateral owner is not the direct debtor in the credit agreement. In addition, between the third party and the creditor (Bank) also do not have a direct legal relationship, because the third party only has a direct legal relationship with the debtor. So that the third party will only get legal protection from the debtor in accordance with the agreement made with the third party.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34628,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal IUS\",\"volume\":\"70 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal IUS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v10i2.1112\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal IUS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v10i2.1112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在分析银行与第三方作为不直接属于债务人的抵押物所有人/履行协议的过程,并分析债务人质押的抵押权客体所有人的法律保护。本研究采用的研究方法是司法实证方法。在执行银行与抵押物所有人第三方之间的协议时,是通过抵押权机制进行的。在债务人违约的情况下。此时,债权人(银行)仍可按照有关规定执行债务人质押的抵押物。第二,uht没有为抵押品所有人/第三方提供足够的保护,因为第三方/抵押品所有人不是信贷协议中的直接债务人。此外,第三人与债权人(银行)之间也不存在直接的法律关系,因为第三人只与债务人存在直接的法律关系。使第三人只能根据与第三人达成的协议得到债务人的法律保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Granting of Mortgage Loans With Guarantees of Land Right Owned by Third Parties in Banking Agreements
This study aims to analyze the process of implementing an agreement between a bank and a third party as a collateral owner/which does not belong directly to the debtor, and analyze the legal protection for the owner of the object of mortgage rights pledged by the debtor. The method of approach used in this research is the juridical empirical approaching method. In the implementation of the agreement between the Bank and the collateral owner third party, it is carried out through the Mortgage Rights mechanism. In the event of default by the debtor. Then, the creditor (bank) can still execute the object of collateral pledged by the debtor in accordance with applicable regulations. Second, the UUHT does not provide enough protection to the collateral owner/third party, considering that the third party/collateral owner is not the direct debtor in the credit agreement. In addition, between the third party and the creditor (Bank) also do not have a direct legal relationship, because the third party only has a direct legal relationship with the debtor. So that the third party will only get legal protection from the debtor in accordance with the agreement made with the third party.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
ISPO Policy on Palm Oil Industry and Biodiesel Development in North Aceh Guidance Concept for Convicts in Penitentiary as Legal Means to Minimize Narcotics Abuse Maximum Limitation of Fines for Economic Crimes In Law Number 1 of 2023 The Future of Sex Robots in Indonesia: Law, Science, And Technology Pancasila's Economic Existence in Business Development: The Efforts to Realize Justice in Business Law
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1