{"title":"观点可能是不正确的!我们认为:关于数据保护法的准确性原则","authors":"Frederik J. Zuiderveen Borgesius, D. Hallinan","doi":"10.1093/idpl/ipz025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The GDPR contains an accuracy principle, as most data privacy laws in the world do. In principle, data controllers must ensure the personal data they process are accurate. Some have argued that the accuracy principle does not apply to personal data in the form of opinions about data subjects. We argue, however, from a positive law perspective, that the accuracy principle does apply to opinions. We further suggest, from a normative perspective, that the accuracy principle should apply to opinions.","PeriodicalId":51749,"journal":{"name":"International Data Privacy Law","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Opinions can be incorrect! In our opinion: on data protection law’s accuracy principle\",\"authors\":\"Frederik J. Zuiderveen Borgesius, D. Hallinan\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/idpl/ipz025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The GDPR contains an accuracy principle, as most data privacy laws in the world do. In principle, data controllers must ensure the personal data they process are accurate. Some have argued that the accuracy principle does not apply to personal data in the form of opinions about data subjects. We argue, however, from a positive law perspective, that the accuracy principle does apply to opinions. We further suggest, from a normative perspective, that the accuracy principle should apply to opinions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51749,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Data Privacy Law\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Data Privacy Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipz025\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Data Privacy Law","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipz025","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
Opinions can be incorrect! In our opinion: on data protection law’s accuracy principle
The GDPR contains an accuracy principle, as most data privacy laws in the world do. In principle, data controllers must ensure the personal data they process are accurate. Some have argued that the accuracy principle does not apply to personal data in the form of opinions about data subjects. We argue, however, from a positive law perspective, that the accuracy principle does apply to opinions. We further suggest, from a normative perspective, that the accuracy principle should apply to opinions.